S-Works
29th Dec 2016, 13:13
I am facing an interesting problem with the Spanish CAA and can't find a route to escalate it for resolution.
I have a pilot who works for us with a Type Rating on a Twin Turboprop. Flew around 4,000hrs on type and then took a job flying the A320 which resulted in the Turboprop Type Rating expiring in December last year. September I was asked to renew it. I carried out an assessment under Part FCL.740 and decided that as he was current on the A320 and therefore current on ME handling as well as the prior time on type that he should do a days ground school and an LPC. This was done and the LPC passed without fault.
The Spanish CAA rejected this as said that he must do at least two "training sessions". I did not agree but capitulated and did two further training sessions and then another examiner did another LPC which he again passed without fault.
So student has done a 1hr LPC originally which now becomes a PUT training flight, a further flight of 1:30 then another flight of 1:00hr plus 5hrs of grand school and another 1hr LPC.
I issued a course completion certificate for 3:30hrs of training and 5hrs of ground school which equates to 4 "training sessions" and they have now rejected this saying the original LPC can't be counted as a training session and the course completion certificate does not cover the content of the training sessions.
I was under the impression that Part FCL.740 specifically delegates the authority to decide what training is required to the ATO and that issue of a course completion certificate indicates that those training requirements set have been fulfilled. The training records are of course fully available for audit and as we train in Spain our ATO is audited by the UK CAA accompanied by a Spanish Inspector who has never raised an issue with our process or paperwork.
Given the above, have a missed something?
I have now hit a brick wall with this and could do with an idea of how to escalate a complaint. The woman processing the paperwork won't even tell me who her line manager is!!!
I have a pilot who works for us with a Type Rating on a Twin Turboprop. Flew around 4,000hrs on type and then took a job flying the A320 which resulted in the Turboprop Type Rating expiring in December last year. September I was asked to renew it. I carried out an assessment under Part FCL.740 and decided that as he was current on the A320 and therefore current on ME handling as well as the prior time on type that he should do a days ground school and an LPC. This was done and the LPC passed without fault.
The Spanish CAA rejected this as said that he must do at least two "training sessions". I did not agree but capitulated and did two further training sessions and then another examiner did another LPC which he again passed without fault.
So student has done a 1hr LPC originally which now becomes a PUT training flight, a further flight of 1:30 then another flight of 1:00hr plus 5hrs of grand school and another 1hr LPC.
I issued a course completion certificate for 3:30hrs of training and 5hrs of ground school which equates to 4 "training sessions" and they have now rejected this saying the original LPC can't be counted as a training session and the course completion certificate does not cover the content of the training sessions.
I was under the impression that Part FCL.740 specifically delegates the authority to decide what training is required to the ATO and that issue of a course completion certificate indicates that those training requirements set have been fulfilled. The training records are of course fully available for audit and as we train in Spain our ATO is audited by the UK CAA accompanied by a Spanish Inspector who has never raised an issue with our process or paperwork.
Given the above, have a missed something?
I have now hit a brick wall with this and could do with an idea of how to escalate a complaint. The woman processing the paperwork won't even tell me who her line manager is!!!