BEagle
23rd Dec 2016, 15:00
Part-FCL is quite clear about the definition of 'solo flight time':
"Solo flight time" means flight time during which a student pilot is the sole occupant of an aircraft.
However, I've recently been advised that, in certain EASA Member States of Southern Europe, ATOs consider that 'supervised' solo flying on a LAPL/PPL course means that an instructor may accompany the student during solo exercises - to the extent that the student might only fly solo in the circuit...
This is not the same as 'SPIC' on integrated commercial courses:
"Student pilot-in-command" (SPIC) means a student pilot acting as pilot-in-command on a flight with an instructor where the latter will only observe the student pilot and shall not influence or control the flight of the aircraft.
Is it really the case that the definition of LAPL/PPL course 'solo flight time' is being flagrantly disregarded in this way?
"Solo flight time" means flight time during which a student pilot is the sole occupant of an aircraft.
However, I've recently been advised that, in certain EASA Member States of Southern Europe, ATOs consider that 'supervised' solo flying on a LAPL/PPL course means that an instructor may accompany the student during solo exercises - to the extent that the student might only fly solo in the circuit...
This is not the same as 'SPIC' on integrated commercial courses:
"Student pilot-in-command" (SPIC) means a student pilot acting as pilot-in-command on a flight with an instructor where the latter will only observe the student pilot and shall not influence or control the flight of the aircraft.
Is it really the case that the definition of LAPL/PPL course 'solo flight time' is being flagrantly disregarded in this way?