Pilot995
2nd Jul 2016, 21:42
Hi everyone!
Ive read alot of threads around, but havn't been able to find a 100% ligit answer. Everyone seems to have their own point of view!
1. Standard missed approach according to Pans Ops Doc 8168, is that based on 1 or 2 engines?
2. Approach Climb limiting masses as calculated for specific airports from eg. APG or Flygprestanda: do they take into account obstacle clearance as described in doc 8168? Eg: 164ft final missed approach segment.
3. If answer to question 2 is no, what is the obstacle clearance single Engine missed approach?
4. If the answer to question 2 is yes, do they take into account a level OFF segment for acceleration? (Minimum 400 AAL)
I am aware that operators construct one Engine inop procedures for departures, wouldn't it then be prudent to use this procedure from example minima. incase of missed approach single engine?
Thanks!
Ive read alot of threads around, but havn't been able to find a 100% ligit answer. Everyone seems to have their own point of view!
1. Standard missed approach according to Pans Ops Doc 8168, is that based on 1 or 2 engines?
2. Approach Climb limiting masses as calculated for specific airports from eg. APG or Flygprestanda: do they take into account obstacle clearance as described in doc 8168? Eg: 164ft final missed approach segment.
3. If answer to question 2 is no, what is the obstacle clearance single Engine missed approach?
4. If the answer to question 2 is yes, do they take into account a level OFF segment for acceleration? (Minimum 400 AAL)
I am aware that operators construct one Engine inop procedures for departures, wouldn't it then be prudent to use this procedure from example minima. incase of missed approach single engine?
Thanks!