Log in

View Full Version : Top airport officials nearly arrested


Continuous Ignition
28th Jun 2002, 09:32
Just one word... Unbelievable!



Top airport officials nearly arrested in spat


By Tim Barker | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted June 28, 2002


After hearing rumors that the federal Transportation Security Administration had quietly set up shop over the weekend at Orlando International Airport, executive director Bill Jennings decided to have a look at the operation Monday.

He almost got arrested for it.

Jennings and a pair of top airport officials, all wearing airport badges, were confronted by a security guard as soon as they entered the fourth floor of the terminal-top parking garage. That's where TSA contractor NCS Pearson had set up a hiring center for airport screeners -- without telling the airport about it.

Despite the trio's efforts to identify themselves, the guard insisted the garage was under federal jurisdiction and demanded they leave the area, going so far as to summon a pair of Orlando police officers.

And while the encounter was diffused without Jennings being led away in cuffs, it has done nothing to ease an increasingly tense relationship between the TSA and the airports it is charged with protecting. The agency must hire as many as 72,000 screeners by year's end.

A TSA spokeswoman said the incident is being investigated and that the agency will do a better job in the future of notifying airports when it plans to use their facilities.

"Clearly we regret that something like this occurred," spokeswoman Heather Rosenker said.

The TSA was created in the aftermath of Sept. 11 to take over security duties at the nation's 429 commercial airports.

Jennings said he is less concerned about the communication failure than he is about his treatment -- and what he considers an unrepentant attitude on the part of NCS Pearson.

"For me, as director of this airport, it was a personal embarrassment," Jennings said. "And if that's any indication of how they will treat potential applicants, that's a very serious matter."

Jennings said he has heard nothing from NCS Pearson. The company did not return phone calls.

There have, however, been rumblings around the airport that the company's employees have been boasting about how close they came to having Jennings arrested.

The reason for that is pretty simple, said Bob Raffel, the airport's senior director of public safety, who was with Jennings during the incident.

"They don't think they made a mistake," Raffel said.

Tim Barker can be reached at [email protected] or 407-420-5022.

www.orlandosentinel.com/business/nationworld/orl-bizoia28062802jun28.story?coll=orl%2Dbusiness%2Dheadlines (http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/nationworld/orl-bizoia28062802jun28.story?coll=orl%2Dbusiness%2Dheadlines)

Roger de Rofton
28th Jun 2002, 12:27
Isn't it amazing just what we are hiring to protect us??

RdR:(

Konkordski
28th Jun 2002, 12:41
I think that, as director of the airport, he should have had the TSA people arrested on principle.

angels
28th Jun 2002, 17:55
It's not April 1 is it??

Astonishing stuff!!

411A
28th Jun 2002, 21:11
Once you let the "Federal" camel into the tent, all bets are off. Expect more of the same.
I personally think its great.
The more this goes on, the better the company aeroplane (or time share aeroplane) looks...and a LOT of pilots will be hired as a result. One of my employees (in an unrelated non-aviation business, age 20) is taking flying lessons right now...and has his career objective as corporate aviation...and when you look at the salaries, it leaves no doubt that this is a good idea. And, no BS from airline management. These guys are looked at as special, and indeed they are. Personally ran a company aviation department in Teheran in the mid-seventies....and the bucks were big indeed, and...no tax...what a deal.

BEagle
28th Jun 2002, 21:31
411a - many people feel obliged to disagree with your comments, but I for one agree with you on this!

'Fractional flight ownership' is a concept I've thought should be the New Way for business passengers whose company can't afford their own bizjet. For example, you kit out a 767ER with 100 posh seats and you offer blocks of 10 to 10 separate companies on particular flights. You fly it from one airport with an exclusive check-in and lounge to others with the same. But the companies to whom you offer the blocks must guarantee the passengers as being bona fide and must also have an insurance agreement covering aviation risk to aircraft and occupants.

The one thing which will really kill business travel is extended check-in time followed by being treated like a criminal by some bottom-fondling failed wheelclamper working as a 'security' official. Time is big buck$ to business travellers - a system needs to be created which allows them to arrive at the airport, complete passport formalities in an agreeable environment and then to be taken direct to their aircraft. At the other end they need to have an 'express' arrival system.

GotTheTshirt
29th Jun 2002, 03:24
Just so you get the picture about this "enhanced seurity"
TSA advertise these security jobs on the internet by Airports. Orlando came on a week or so ago and a friend of mine was interested and on the net is a questionaire that you fill in. This is marked immediately and you are told if you are sucessful. You are then are given a number to call. He passed the test ( surprise surprise!!) and called the number on Saturday and was told to report to Orlando airport on Tuesday for "final Interview" and if this was sucessful he would start the indoctrination class the next day !!
Obviously only looking for out of work people as no time to give notices !!!
Is this paranoia or what !!



:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :confused:

B Sousa
29th Jun 2002, 05:10
411A
Right on the money. Once the Government is involved things will get worse. Taxpayers think they are getting a good deal. OK, now they have to pay the wages and benefits for umpteen thousand more Government employees.
The airlines must be laughing big time.....
Some call government employees "Air Force Missles" They wont work and you cant fire them...........

ww1
29th Jun 2002, 08:17
Our tax dollars at work....
:rolleyes:

thermostat
30th Jun 2002, 01:05
The Director had every right to be informed of their actions. Quite rude of them to walk in and "take over" without consulting him. It's this "attitude" thing that's going around now like a virus.

On the other hand, the director now knows how we as Pilots feel every time we go through a security check and are made to feel like "the bad guy". The shoe was on the other foot for a change.

Just my thoughts.

kbf1
30th Jun 2002, 11:08
What T-Shirt says is quite worrying. To obtain an airside pass in the UK all staff MUST be security cleared to BC (Basic Check) level to ensure they have no criminal convictions or have been brought to the of the authorities for all of the wrong reasons. To be allowed anywhere near an aircraft an applicant has to go through a CTC (Counter-Terrorism Check) which is much more stringent. It is easy to tell who has been cleared to what level if you know what to look for around a BAA airfield.

If you attend interview on Tues and start the following Monday who does the security checks and how thorough are they if they are completed in less than a week? To say that you can always dismiss an employee if they are on a training course and they subsequently fail a background check is folly. By the time they have been dismissed they have already learned about airport security procedures, all of which is potentially useful information to anyone who wishes to use it.