Women Pilots

[ariel]

Does anybody know if there is any truth in the rumour that airlines are more likely to take on female pilots than male pilots, because it's PC to do this?

[RichT]

I doubt if anyone would admit to it.

[Artificial Horizon]

Most airlines do have a certain quota of 'minorities' that they aim to fill and as there is a smaller percentage of pilots that are women, a fully qualified and capable female pilot would have a SLIGHTLY increased chance of employment. However let me stress that it certainly isn't easy for anyone (including women) to get an airline job, you still have to put in the work and impress at the interviews, so I wouldn't either worry about or rely on the assumption that it is easier for women. At the end of the day, anyone who ends up in employment has done it on the back of their own hard work!! :)

[Windy]

The sex discrimination act - makes it illegal to directly or indirectly discrminate on the basis of sex (a few job specific exceptions). This therefore includes positive discrmination - words such as quota are taboo's under the act and such practice would result in a breach of legislation. However employers are allowed to offer training in order to create a level playing field before selection - however any inequalities with in the decision process giving any group any advantage are illegal.

Unfortuantly this does not address the years where some groups have been advantaged so it will take a long time of even, ethical recruitment to redress the balance.

[This message has been edited by Windy (edited 01 March 2001).]

[Jonty]

Be a black, disabled lesbian and your in!!

This is a joke before anyone starts!! :)

[Hot&Heavy]

Too right Jonty!

And the sky isn't pink! And it's the cockpit, not the box office....

Oh dear, better stop there before the death threats start rolling in.

Humour - don't start on me please.

[mutt]

I can truthfully say that my employer is 100% against female pilots. They do not employ any and never will!

Mutt.

PS, this has to do with religion and women are definitely in a no-win situation.

[UKPPL]

Mutt - Strewth, I thought operators out of Newcastle would have become more 'PC' since the working mens'clubs up there started accepting female members...

Only joking!

[RVR800]

I would guess that women pilots are in with
a much better chance of getting into an
airline simply because women pilots are under represented.

Successful business women passengers like to see women represented on the flight deck

From memory only 2 percent of ATPLs are women (in the UK) !!

[Bailed Out]

At the risk of getting my b*lls cut off, does anyone know of any overweight, ugly, hairy women flying the line or is it that I just haven't met them yet.

Just food for thought.


[This message has been edited by Bailed Out (edited 04 March 2001).]

[Buffy Summers]

Artifical Horizon, apart from BA can you name any UK airline that has any kind of quota for women pilots, because I have yet to come across one.
Bailed Out, thank you for the compliment (I think!), of course all female pilots are beautiful, sexy, intelligent AND can fly a plane.
As for this ongoing myth about airlines taking on women pilots because they have to, or letting them in even if they were not the best applicant its absolute rubbish.
I think BA might be the only airline that has anything like the standard 3% figure that should represent the % of female ATPL holders.
If you speak to female pilots you will find out all about the difficulties faced by airlines who still forget about the female pilots they have.
Things like no female uniforms available for months, issuing male fitting uniforms to women pilots, having entire manuals written only for "him" and with things like saying all pilots must have short hair, that sort of thing.
We are, believe me, still in the 20th century when it comes to this sort of thing.

[BJF]

I was on an actual flight once where a male passenger demanded to be put on another flight because the Captain was a woman. Sad but true and I think that it is CR*P like this which has employers afraid to employ women.

I do think that certain airlines employ women because it is PC, but I also agree with the fact that if they were not capable in the first place, they wouldn't get the seat.

[Buffy Summers]

If a passenger doesn't want to fly with a woman pilot then that is THEIR problem, not the airline's. Personally I would be very happy for them to not get on the flight and pay for a different flight. As for demanding to be put on another flight, well the answer is simple, this crew are fully licenced and experienced and the aircraft is serviceable. The service is operating and if you have a problem with that then go pay for another flight. Why should the airline side with that ignorant passenger? I don't think its even remotely a problem for airlines. Airlines also see women pilots as a good excuse for some PR. There is still crap even now about "the first all female crew" and the like, whereas in reality its been going on for years.
I often fly all female crew and we always get plenty of comments at the beginning and then, when the flight is actually very good, we get patronising comments at the end like "well done for getting us here" and things like that, as if its quite amazing that we completed the flight safely.

[helimutt]

Is MUTT from Newcastle?

[Pandora]

It is a sad but true fact that there is a general perception that women must be ever so slightly substandard to men when it comes to flying aircraft. After all, I only got my job because there's a 'girl quota' to be filled, right? and I only passed all of the flying tests because I winked at the examiner, and when the examiner was a woman I passed because she was showing solidarity. Passengers on my sectors ask for flight deck visits, not to visit the flight deck but to have a look at the lady pilot. And when I do the 'bye-byes' at the end of the flight I've had more than the odd comment. I feel resigned to going through my career with the general public and even some of my professional colleagues (including an instructor who should know better) making the allegation that somehow I have got in through a back door. The only people who have not carried on in this way are my employers, who say we are all trained professionals. Anyone who is hoping that as a woman they may have a better chance of getting into the airlines is being selfish and doing a disservice to her colleagues.

[Raw Data]

I remember once having five pax (all the same party) refuse to get on the aircraft when they say a female sitting in the left seat. They later agreed to fly subject to the other pilot (me) taking command. They were escorted to the door with what could be desrcibed as a certain lack of respect.

On the one hand, it is absolutely true that some of the larger airlines have occasionally hired women under pressure to be PC (I have that first-hand). On the other hand, it is also true the women often need to prove themselves more thoroughly in training. I doubt that, on average, a clear advantage exists.

What has hurt the cause of women pilots, is the few who have failed courses or checks, and then screamed discrimination. This makes airlines VERY wary indeed. The other thing that makes airlines very wary is the possibility of pregnancy! ;)

The worst aspect of this whole subject is the few women who wear their feminist credentials next to their wings, and make life miserable for every male pilot unfortunate enough to fly with them. Luckily, such folk are few and far between- but they do exist.

In my experience, both in training and everyday line flying, I have enjoyed immensely working with female pilots. Most of them are excellent and in a lot of ways, display a better temperament than men, not being so prone to taking risks or "pressing on".

Finally, It completely escapes me why there are so few women in aviation. Given the physical and mental requirements of the job, I would have thought thousands of women would have been doing it.

[Speedbird252]

Im totally with Buffy, you pay for a service, which is a safe and certified aircraft, and a licensed and qualified crew. If the entire crew is female, so what? Anyone who still thinks that a commercial aircraft with a female at the wheel is a problem needs to take their head out of there ar$e.

Good luck to all you girlie drivers. Its about time.

[Ellion]

It is who you know and not what you know. Always has been, always will be.

How do you think I got my job driving nice shiny 73's!

Get out and meet people, get yourself known.

[Pontius]

Buffy,

Can you expand on your question to Artificial Horizon? You say 'apart from BA' when asking about airline quotas for female pilots, implying BA have a quota to fill.

Let me make it VERY clear that BA has no such quota. If a lady is employed by BA as a pilot (TEP or DEP) it is because they have satisfied the selectors that they match the selection criteria. There are absolutely NO instructions (written, implied or spoken) that 'N' pilots should be female, Asian or whatever other minority that people not in the 'know' talk about. They are there purely because of their merits.

There are bigots everywhere in life and they exist in the airline world. I have, in the past, heard comments such as 'she's only here because she's a she'. Fortunately I'm in a position to address that and correct the un-learned gentleman.

One extremely good reason for only accepting people who make the grade, is so that all the ladies who are already 'in' and operating to the high standards expected are not tarred with the 'she only got in because...' brush. That is to say; if a female pilot were accepted because of her sex and it were discovered, then all the other female pilots would have the same stigma attached to the; be it true or not. A clear and unambigious selection policy is the only way to get round this.

So, if anyone is in the least bit confused, let me reiterate. BA will employ ANYONE who is good enough and passes the selection procedure. Absolutely NO 'allowance' is made for your sex, skin colour, sexual preference or the employer of your parents (for those with the 'he only got in because his Dad's a Training Capt' hang-up.

Hope that makes things clear for everybody :)

Pontius

------------------
You Ain't Seen Me - Right !!

[Roadtrip]

Being female or minority will likely get you an interview and job long before a white male would normally. However, once in training and on the line, you'd better be capable. If not you'll quickly develope a reputation. Seen more than a few times with some people who were hired, slithered through training and then were a "problem" on the line. In my last company, there was one particularly bad example of someone who should have been fired, but wasn't because the company was afraid of a lawsuit. Like I said, it may get you an interview and hired sooner -- but you'd better be able to hack the program, or your going to get a reputation that's hard to live down on the line.

[Raw Data]

Pontius:

>> There are absolutely NO instructions (written, implied or spoken) that 'N' pilots should be female, Asian or whatever other minority that people not in the 'know' talk about. <<

Of course there aren't, that would be illegal!

BA might not practise such selectivity, but others do and such policies are NEVER admitted to (for the reason given above). It is usually something decided by an individual (such as a Chief Pilot), or is an "understanding" amongst recruiters. I have seen it first-hand.

Fortunately, the more enlightened employers (such as BA) are seldom subject to such problems as internal checks and balances tend to prevent them.

It's probably worth noting that the more likely scenario is a candidate blaming their inability to get a job on their membership of a minority, or their gender...

[Pandora]

Women pilots in BA - approx 120
Men pilots in BA - approx 3500

So its obvious to me that there is definitely a leaning by recruiters toward one of the sexes. And BA is supposed to be one of the fairer recruiters.

[MikeSierra]

Hang on there a minute, Pandora!
The fact that there are only approx. 120 pilots in BA doesn't mean that they are leaning towards hiring males!
How many women do you think pursue such a profession?? Yes Yes, in our day and age there are still loads of women who think it's "a man's job". Maybe you don't! Or the other females on this forum that want to become pilots but there are people that do see it like that!! It's not BA's fault!


------------------
G-XX...finals and hopefully land!

[This message has been edited by MikeSierra (edited 14 March 2001).]

[Pandora]

MS

I was merely (perhaps unsuccessfully) trying to point out the stupidity of the suggestion that airlines are trying to recruit more women by bending the equal opportunities law. If this was the case surely there would be a lot more women out here flying aircraft for a living. It's simple - if the airlines have a woman/black/whatever quota to fill, why not just stop recruiting white men for a while? Before you jump up and down, yes I know that is a stupid suggestion as well. Which all brings us back to the point that I don't think that positive discrimination is as widespread as the men out there think it is.

[Roadtrip]

Pandora-
There IS considerable leaning towards giving women much more of an "in" than white males. I've seen it first hand many times. The fact that there are a much smaller percent of female pilots is a reflection of the number of women who want to come into the pilot career. Face it, being a pilot makes for a VERY lousy family lifestyle. I've seen a much higher percentage of females (vs. males), who once they decide that they really want a family and children after all, leave the profession. Some try the mommy-track and warehouse their children in day/night care and with non-family care. In the US, at least, (and I'm sure in Europe also) a woman does not have to be nearly as competitive as a male to get an interview and job. That is not necessarily to say they're any worse, but they almost certainly won't have the flying hours and experience that the guy sitting beside her at the interview does. It sounds nice to deny it, but it all the bleating by libbers won't change the facts. If I were a woman, would I take the interview and job earlier than my male counterparts?? Certainly! But I'd make darn sure I was fully capable first.

[Buffy Summers]

Pontius, I excluded BA because, as has been pointed out, they have above the average of 3% (and I think 3% is the number of female licence holders also, so anything above that is good). Also, they have done well by advertising for their cadets in magazines that women read, to spark their interest. They are the only UK airline I can think of that have done that, and its great. Obviously that will draw more applications but I also agree that they still have to get to the same standard as everyone else.

Roadtrip, I think you are talking rubbish. There are still airlines which have no women pilots, so why would any airline feel pressured to take on someone sub standard? Thats just a stupid recruiter!

Raw Data, why did you not just tell your passengers that if they didn't want to take up their booking on the flight, that was up to them? Why give them special treatment? If the Captain was a woman would should anyone pander to someone? Would the same have happened if 5 women turned up and refused to fly with a male Captain?

Roadtrip, perhaps you could enlighten all the women pilots as to these airlines you know of who take on anyone if they are female, even if they don't have the required hours/ experience. Then we can all apply and be handed a job on a plate? This seems to be what you are saying, so come on, tell us who.

As for why more women don't fly, well there are a number of reasons but I don't think lifestyle is the prime one. Most women have no idea what an airline pilots lifestyle is.

Personally I had to work quite hard to get any flying schools to take me seriously, and it was generally hard work. My boyfriend would always be the one getting all the information and answers even when it was me asking the questions (he hates flying).

After a while it gets a bit wearing. Even now at my local flying club you get men coming up and wanting to brag about how good a pilot they are, and to be honest, I don't want to know. I just want to turn up, go fly, be treated with respect.

I think the whole macho thing that exists at a lot (not all) flying clubs in the UK is a major factor.

Then there is the cost of training. I believe that even now there is a pay differential between men and women (in non flying jobs). Women don't earn so much. Men are the ones who are expected to be supported by their girlfriend/wife and generally women will let their man go off and attempt to fulfill his ambition whilst being realistic and staying in a standard job so that there is one income coming in.

But I am sure there are more reasons and this would need a whole new thread....

[Raw Data]

Buffy

>> Raw Data, why did you not just tell your passengers that if they didn't want to take up their booking on the flight, that was up to them? Why give them special treatment? If the Captain was a woman would should anyone pander to someone? Would the same have happened if 5 women turned up and refused to fly with a male Captain? <<

We did- they never actually got on the aircraft. The conversation I described took all of 10 seconds and they were off the flight. No way we would delay departure for that sort of nonsense- they were also written letters explaining that if they had a problem with female captains, they were most welcome to take their business elsewhere.

[Roadtrip]

Buffy -
Take 3 deep breaths and read what I wrote again. I didn't say they weren't "technically" qualified. I said that they generally did not have to be as competitive as a male would ordinarily have to be. There are minimum standards for the job, but more importantly, minimum competetive standards. I still contend that most males (unless getting special consideration via friendship or nepotism) must meet the competitive standards, while a female may only need meet the minimum standards. Minimum "standards" in terms of hours/experience for any major airline are almost always well below the "competitive" level. While an airline may only "require" 1000TT/300Multi, you will find that to be competitive (as a male) you must have 4000 hours + turbine time + 1500 PIC. You will find many women may not have the normal "competitive" credentials, but get interviews and hired with much less flying time and experience than a male would ordinarily have.

It's dangerous to generalize, because there are always exceptions - but from my personal experience, what I said is "generally" true.


[This message has been edited by Roadtrip (edited 15 March 2001).]

[hat n' sash]

Despite what a few female contributors might delude themselves into believing, most of the rest of us are not misogynists. I don’t believe that I am. I have no problem with equality but I do get pissed off with posturing political correctness dressed-up as equality.

What do I mean by this? Pontus would have us believe that Big Airways do not operate a quota system (which would of course be illegal). Oh Yeah? Consider the statistical likelihood of any large carrier ending up with a percentage of female pilots that exactly mirrors the split in ATPL holders. Coincidence, eh? – rubbish. In a past life I was a regular visitor to a FTO that held a BA contract. Lined up on the wall were photographs of past graduating courses. I would invite Pontius to scan this long line of photographs and again, consider the statistical likelihood that the minority group representation (both female and from the ethnic minorities) arose from anything other than social engineering. I suggest nil.

Oh and scottishburd:- you tone rings a bell. We too have a couple of female pilots who sing a similar tune; constant moaning about sexism throughout training and on the line. One refers to all (yes, all) of the training captains as “..sexist pigs..” Both are a little more reticent about the obscenely extended initial and continuation training bestowed upon them training in order that they could qualify to a dubious standard. Equality would have meant them suffering the same fate as their male colleagues i.e., being chopped. As I said, I’m in favour of equality, but are you?

[Raw Data]

Another scenario that has presented itself far too frequently is the female/ethnic minority member or whatever failing a course, and then threatening to go public with the old "I was a victim of discrimination" story. It amazes me (perhaps it shouldn't) how many employers cave in to this sort of pressure. But then, I guess the adverse publicity is worth more than another course...

Have to say, though, that most of the women I have either trained or flown with are top-notch folk.

[Slacker]

The women captains whom I've encountered are either: a. not good
b. serioulsy insecure
c. there to prove something they can't
d. hate men
e. like to- "make the rounds"
f. all of the above

[Whirlybird]

I don't work for the airlines so I can't comment as to attitudes there. I do know that in places such as flying schools discrimination against women is COMMON. When I started learning to fly I wasn't expecting it or ready for it, as I hadn't run into it in any other areas to anything like that extent - and I've had quite a chequered career. It's not universal, and none of you need to protest that you personally aren't prejudiced - I believe you! But it IS amazingly widespread considering this is the 21st century. You only have to look at PPRuNE! How long before this thread starts to degenerate as similar ones have usually done. If it hasn't already.

The last time I wrote this sort of thing I got told I was obsessed with gender. I'm not. But I'm now aware enough of attitudes that I can protect myself. There's a difference.

------------------
Whirly

To fly is human, to hover, divine.

[Speedbird48]

Here in the US the quota is alive and well. A Training Captain was trying to upgrade the poor skills of a female last month only to be told" it doesn't matter I am off to United next month"
I was trained by two ladys in the UK in the mid '50's and had the pleasure/honor of flying with one of them many years later when she was a Captain of a Comet, and I was doing some free-lance, between jobs. Those ladies deserved their positions in the industry, they earned it not like the present breed of female.

[Jumbo Flaps]

I would like to voice an opinion with regard to women pilots.
The intellectual requirements of a pilot are well within the reach of most individuals from the civilised and educated world. There is nothing in a pilot's job which would make it more advantageous for a male over a female. There is indeed a lot of responsibility to being a pilot, but other than that it is a "cushy number". The brain if a female is better structured to accomplish multiple tasks. A certain degree of confidence needed to when engaged in the operation of very large high speed aluminium tubing. It is well within the reach of either sex to gain the self belief needed to be a good pilot.
The number of women pilots in an airline has more to do with external forces acting in society.
The argument throughout this thread seems to vent steam from the conflict between male and female pilots.
It is the attitude and arrogance of male pilots and the attitude and arrogance of female pilots that need review. This boils down to personality. There are nice people and the not so nice.
It would be more beneficial to address the problem that good looking women are over represented in airlines. Similarly good looking men are over represented. This is a growing cause for concern throughout society in every profession. It is the same theme that runs through MTV's "Real World" show. Good looking people creating bigger viewing audiences or better airline company image, let's face it the only diference between airlines. The trouble is with good looks comes confidence, arrogance. Men on power trips and women on power trips.
Then of course women pilots want to "do the rounds". Wake up men, women want sex just like you. You want to also, but she threatens your masculinity.
I have the world's greatest sense of humour, so I am here to represent the ugly women of the airlines. Let's see how many of them are out there. Register a comment in this thread if you are ugly and female. Register a comment in this thread if you are ugly and male.
Then we'll see if all women pilots are Tasty. I'll bet I get no response.....Ha!

[dingducky]

well i am ugly and female
but i don't fly http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/frown.gif

------------------
If God had meant us to travel economy class, he would have made us narrower!

[Whirlybird]

Jeez... I really honestly don't know. When I was younger I wasn't that bad looking, but hardly a raving beauty. These days I seem to see more wrinkles and droopy bits every time I look in the mirror. I don't think I often rate a second glance, but some people seem to think I'm attractive. I guess I'm just an ordinary average sort of person - and I think that probably applies to most people, pilots or otherwise.



------------------
Whirly

To fly is human, to hover, divine.

[airforcenone]

At the risk of being contentious, has anyone considered that the reason that BA and others have relatively few female or minority pilots is that the vast majority of wannabes in the UK are likely to be single, white males.

PS: I have no axe to grind .........

[helimutt]

I work mainly at sea on tankers. What does this have to do with flying? I am flown out to join ships all over the world and have had the odd flight with female captains. There is definitely a look appears on the pax faces when pa springs into life and female voice announces she is the Capt. I usually reach for the sick bag straight away(just joking).
I also fly helicopters and have met female helo pilots.
In the 11 years I've been at sea I've worked with about a dozen female engineers and only one of them that I know is actually capable of the job we do. The rest have all been promoted because of who they've slept with, etc. This is true and not a word of a lie.
The navigation department of a ship tends to have slightly higher percentage of females but even then, not many.
The point I'm trying to make is that if a female is in an engine room on a ship and can't do her job, someone else always ends up doing it for her. In an aircraft, if a female couldn't do her job then the plane would probably crash, especially if there were two women in the cockpit not knowing what to do. So I believe there isn't a PC issue here, only that there aren't many women going into the aviation industry. How many unemployed female ATPL holders are there compared percentage wise to male ATPL holders out of work?
Just my views!


[This message has been edited by helimutt (edited 17 March 2001).]

[Lady Heath]

I personally would be very angry if I learned that I received sponsorship or an airline job becasue I am female and pass the minima. I belive that if I was male I would also be in the position I am thankful to be in :)

I think some women spoil it for the rest of us - the ones who have to prove themselves better than males or generally make a fuss on the subject. It's immature.

The beauty of being female is being different from males. I belive that a male and female together make a great team because both have different qualities to offer and that as a result is a strength :)

[CT..Thor]

I agree with Speedbird48. In the US. the quota system is alive and well. Its not a publicized matter, but, the hour requirements are lower for women applicants.My airline activly recruits minorities even without them submitting resumes or applications. They send them the aplication! Also, minorities get more chances at extra training and checkrides than a white male.(but we do look at this as job security!)
I have no problem with women pilots but I do have a problem with the playing field not being level.

[Kiltie]

Returning to the original question, has anyone got the guts to answer YES or NO?

Personally, YES.

As the baddie said in the Bond film, let the mayhem begin!

[This message has been edited by Kiltie (edited 18 March 2001).]

[cherie]

there are more good pilots at cx than ever before!!!

[Harry Wragg]

The company I work for automatically interviews any female applicants (obviously they meet the minimum criteria). I know this because I asked the person who is responsible. Just a statement of fact, not an opinion, read into it what you will.

In order to get a job one has to stand out from the crowd, by being female in a male dominated industry you do so by default. FYI I used to work in the recruitment department of a large blue chip company. Selection is often not very scientific!

[This message has been edited by Harry Wragg (edited 18 March 2001).]

[Pontius]

Hat n' Sash,

I'm going to get into your personal photographic interpretation. What I will tell you (and that isn't suggest), is that BA will select anybody who is qualified for the job and passes the selection procedure. There is no quota, nor even the merest suggestion that any person from any minority should be taken before anyone else.

Who actually applies for the job is another matter. It has already been suggested that white males are more likely to apply to BA and I wouldn't disagree with that. In order to keep the field level all groups of people should be aware that they could apply to join if they wanted to. That is not discriminatory, it just lets everyone know they all have the same opportunities (it is for this reason that BA advertised some time ago in Asian papers and womens magazines). Some people in the company got a little upset by this and suggested that this was positive discrimination. When it was pointed out that the advertisment had also been run in Flight etc they calmed down a little, but it doesn't take a lot for people to go too far off track.

As I said before, the only way to go about this sort of stuff is to make sure that evryone knows they have the opportunity and to select only on merit and suitability for the job. This is true in all walks of life, but I can guarantee that is how BA operates...take it from one who knows :)

Toodle oo,

Pontius

------------------
You Ain't Seen Me - Right !!

[Red Snake]

Interesting to note through all this thread is that, while there are obviously postings from both sides of the Atlantic, no one has commented on the differences in hiring policies for women between the U.S. and Europe.

Having now worked as a commercial pilot in California and the UK, I can honestly say that it easier to get an interview if you are female in the U.S. (note I say interview, not job). I presume this is because of the affirmative action laws in the US. And all the talk of 'my career would be much further along now if I had tits' made for a thoroughly unpleasant work environment.

In my experience of 3 UK airlines, I have come up against some negative discrimination in one previous job. It's always hard to know why you don't get an interview, but I do believe discrimination was a factor with one UK airline which I think is the same one eluded to earlier in this thread.

Having said that, if I compare my career with that of my (male and female) colleagues, I'm behind some and ahead of others - probably about right. My current employer has always treated me fairly and equally as a professional pilot, no more, no less. And that's as it should be.

[scroggs]

Many years ago now, I was involved in the training of some of the first women pilots and navigators in the RAF. The RAF is an organisation that has to occasionally adjust its selection standards to reflect the realities of its current attractiveness in the employment market. In the late '80s, it was (as it is now) getting very difficult to recruit sufficient aircrew, so some recruiting standards were lowered (although it was never presented as such), and it was decided to allow women to apply.
This policy shift was extremely high-profile, so the pressure was then on to produce the first wings-qualified women. In order to fast-track the system, the very first girls came from within the RAF, as their personal qualities were already a known quantity. Many failed, and could perhaps have a case if they suggested that they were more harshly judged than their male colleagues. Misogeny? Maybe, but there was a real desire to produce female pilots and navs of the highest quality, whose qualification to wear the wings could not be doubted.
Once the high-profile first students had passed through the system, the real problems began to appear. The major one was that all the training staff were very male, no more than 35 years old, and as macho a group of blokes as you could expect to meet. Without any suggestion from above, it pretty soon became obvious (on the shop floor) that some women were getting preferential treatment. It was therefore no surprise that the better looking, and more extrovert, women seemed to have a better chance of passing the various courses. Has that had any ramifications in later service? You bet! We got some pretty, poor pilots in some highly dangerous positions. (Take that how you like!) So it's equally no surprise that there is a certain amount of scepticism when the subject of women aircrew comes up. I must stress that this is not a result of RAF policy, just a natural (and predictable) result of human relationships.
In the civilian world, there has also been a corporate desire to be seen to be 'doing the right thing', and so there may well be a greater chance for a woman to get an interview than a man, all else being equal. As more interview and training staff are female these days, however, there is less (but not no) chance that favouritism will be shown. It will happen sometimes, that's life.
At the end of the day, though, the best pilots will come from those with a willingness to learn, and a receptive attitude. Look at yourselves, and ask yourselves whether women or men best embody those characteristics?

[tugtishu]

[This message has been edited by tugtishu (edited 21 March 2001).]

[FreshPrinceofBA]

I've brushed through the thread and so far I don't recall anyone mentioning aptitude. I've heard mention that according to the RAF methods of measuring pilot aptitude the average male candidate has a better chance of meeting the required standard than the average female. Is this true?
Being an airline pilot is obviously a different matter as providing one has the capacity to understand aerad plates, maps and r/t that's enough. You could train a monkey to fly an ILS!
I have only flown/ known a few female trainee pilots and in general what they may have lacked in ability they made up with hard graft. I would have no qualms about flying a civil aircraft with any of them. However, I have experienced first hand the extra allowances that get made and the extra tuition that is always forthcoming, so called lumpy-jumper syndrome. As someone said previously it requires a certain type of man to not allow his judgement to be clouded when a good looking woman is involved (I would hope I could, but I doubt it). In the aviation fraternity there are many astute people including other women that hold the opinion that there are women pilots that are not worthy of their post. Equality and fairness and the even application of standards will only be improved when the ratios are better balanced. In this respect women are standing in their own way due to the lack of applicants that are women. Why is this? Those that succeed are those, Male or Female, that strive to meet the required standards. We should praise everyone that does and expose all that don't meet those standards.

As an aside I was told by a RAF recruitment officer at a debrief at Cranwell "If you were asian it would be different". I was fourth on the waiting list for a sixth form scholarship. Also there were two asians and three women on my BA course of eighteen (all of whom proved that they could meet the required standards). Do these ratios reflect the proportions of initial applicants? I wonder why not? I am lucky that I have been able to study with an increased gender/ race diversity than if the application ratios had prevailed through the selection procedure. I pity the applicants that were "less unusual" that have fallen by the wayside to allow them in.
I'm not racist but neither do I descriminate against the majority.

FP
FP

[ariel]

Goodness!

Never expected to open such a can of worms over my original thread of whether or not female pilots receive preferential treatment. Has made for excellent reading though

ariel

[Roc]

My Airline employs alot of women, it's US based. The biggest problem I see with Women pilots is not their abilities, its their motivation and goals. I've seen this many times before, in the USAF as well. The girls show up ready and willing to try their best and work hard, then they get married, and soon the kids arrive and soon after that ole "Amelia" is taking long leave of absences or just plain quitting!!! Please don't argue this point, At my Airbase we had 10 female pilots, 8 left the military before their committment was up. The other 2 joined the airlines, 1 flies for United, the other quit United! and started her own store selling aeroma-therapy products!! I'm not saying theres anything wrong, and maybe the female urge to be with the kids and raise them is overpowering to some, but the facts speak for themselves. At my airline we have a disproportionate amount of women who bypass Captain and fly as First Officers instead. I guess if Hubby is bringing in big bucks, theres no need for the added responsibilities of command. So from an employers perspective women pilots are less than a stable workforce that one can rely on and build upon. What are some of your experiences? Like I said, I have no quarrel with women pilots, I enjoy flying with them, and I know they can do the job. So do any of you out in Pprune-land have similar observations?

[Buffy Summers]

I have been appalled to hear of the number of alleged cases of women being "let in" to airlines even when not up to standard.
I have yet to meet anyone (male or female) who has made similar comments. The airline I work for (UK) did not used to employ women pilots, but when the airline got taken over a number of women were in the new airline. Since that time the airline has taken a very positive attitude and now actively encourages women to apply. If they had found the women to be of sub standard, or needed lots of extra training I don't think this would be their view. Personally, out of all the women pilots in my company, all have passed their courses in the standard or less time scale.

Finally, I would just like to add that perhaps we should think about something else on this thread. A few pilots have mentioned that women have been employed because of their looks, and male training captains have passed the women because they are good looking, also that women have got their jobs because of their relationship with some male in the airline.

I think this says a hell of a lot more about the men doing the recruiting and training than it does about the women who are accepted for jobs that they are not up to.

Does anyone know if there are any sub standard women pilots being recruited by companies where a female is used in the recruiting process? Perhaps we should have more women pilots doing the recruiting, as they would appear to have certain qualities the men lack....

[XENA]

Just an observation...the most bitchy and emotionally unstable pilots I have come across in 13 years as a pilot have all been male.

Let's not forget Amy, Amelia and Beryl.