Natstrackalpha
16th Jun 2014, 11:54
Can anyone help with this please?
On approach autoland, ILS with autopilot, any approach you want, RNAV, VOR, (I know they are different)
Question is about go around mechanics - (not the rules of)
Physically - at MDA or DH depending on the type of approach -
To go around - select GA alt which has already been pre-set by who ever set it - PF or PM. (That's a question in itself)
2/. Select TOGA assuming we want a hard TOGA go around - (which at this point "Go-Around" would be the case)
-notwithstanding the flap settings and speeds, track, just for this question -
-can one assume therefore that given the same decision to go-around a mere selection of TOGA only (autopilot/s engaged) will continue the flight path in TOGA and will have no affect on climb or descent profile.
In other words - as has been suggested, the aircraft would continue the approach but in TOGA? (not the best of situations.)
On approach autoland, ILS with autopilot, any approach you want, RNAV, VOR, (I know they are different)
Question is about go around mechanics - (not the rules of)
Physically - at MDA or DH depending on the type of approach -
To go around - select GA alt which has already been pre-set by who ever set it - PF or PM. (That's a question in itself)
2/. Select TOGA assuming we want a hard TOGA go around - (which at this point "Go-Around" would be the case)
-notwithstanding the flap settings and speeds, track, just for this question -
-can one assume therefore that given the same decision to go-around a mere selection of TOGA only (autopilot/s engaged) will continue the flight path in TOGA and will have no affect on climb or descent profile.
In other words - as has been suggested, the aircraft would continue the approach but in TOGA? (not the best of situations.)