Almost Okay
24th Jan 2014, 07:49
I appreciate many will have their own opinions but references would be much appreciated, rather than just opinion alone. Thank you.
From the ATC Forum:
Be gentle please! I've registered to ask a question that came up on a flight a couple of days ago and I've been unable to find a satisfactory answer elsewhere on the Interweb.
A search of the site revealed answers regarding the cancellation, or otherwise, of altitude restrictions but I have a query regarding the actual flying of an SID when compared to my ATC clearance. There will, no doubt, be gasps of exasperation and cries of 'you didn't know that' but I've never flown an entire SID without ATC giving me other instructions, so it's never been a 'player'. Finally, before someone does go off half-cocked, can I just assure you that I do know what I THINK I'm going to do but if someone has a reference to the actual correct methodology that would be brilliant, as my search of ICAO 4444 has been somewhat lacking in its results.
In somewhere like the UK it is very easy; you're given an SID and that's it. Fly the lateral and vertical profile up to the final SID altitude restriction and then wait for ATC to give you higher. Snagless.
My question arises from the typical clearances given in Japan (and other places). Let's take NRT as an example from 34L. Clearance is "BAY 4 Departure, maintain FL200, expect FL350, Squawk 1234".
I don't expect anyone to go looking for a diagram of the SID but suffice to say it has three relevant altitude restrictions, namely: At or below 7000, At or above 11000 and At or above FL200.
As I write this it seems blindingly obvious what the answer is but I'll continue to ask, just for the reference and because I enjoy the humiliation.
Clearly I will stop my climb at 7000 by the appropriate point and this is where ATC normally tell me to climb further but what happens if they don't? Having passed the 7000 restriction point am I then cleared, without further instruction, to climb to FL200 (ensuring I pass the 11000 restriction at or above)? That was the initial clearance from Delivery but I'm so used to normal intervention by ATC that I'm not absolutely positive any more.
This is not a question of obeying restrictions if given something different by ATC but purely a question of can I follow the entire vertical profile of the SID if not told differently by ATC. The US have a very nice 'climb via' phrase that leaves no doubt in my mind but that's not the case elsewhere and I'd really like to be able to point to a reference for the ICAO means of correctly executing an SID if not otherwise directed by ATC.
Thank you for your perseverance :)
From the ATC Forum:
Be gentle please! I've registered to ask a question that came up on a flight a couple of days ago and I've been unable to find a satisfactory answer elsewhere on the Interweb.
A search of the site revealed answers regarding the cancellation, or otherwise, of altitude restrictions but I have a query regarding the actual flying of an SID when compared to my ATC clearance. There will, no doubt, be gasps of exasperation and cries of 'you didn't know that' but I've never flown an entire SID without ATC giving me other instructions, so it's never been a 'player'. Finally, before someone does go off half-cocked, can I just assure you that I do know what I THINK I'm going to do but if someone has a reference to the actual correct methodology that would be brilliant, as my search of ICAO 4444 has been somewhat lacking in its results.
In somewhere like the UK it is very easy; you're given an SID and that's it. Fly the lateral and vertical profile up to the final SID altitude restriction and then wait for ATC to give you higher. Snagless.
My question arises from the typical clearances given in Japan (and other places). Let's take NRT as an example from 34L. Clearance is "BAY 4 Departure, maintain FL200, expect FL350, Squawk 1234".
I don't expect anyone to go looking for a diagram of the SID but suffice to say it has three relevant altitude restrictions, namely: At or below 7000, At or above 11000 and At or above FL200.
As I write this it seems blindingly obvious what the answer is but I'll continue to ask, just for the reference and because I enjoy the humiliation.
Clearly I will stop my climb at 7000 by the appropriate point and this is where ATC normally tell me to climb further but what happens if they don't? Having passed the 7000 restriction point am I then cleared, without further instruction, to climb to FL200 (ensuring I pass the 11000 restriction at or above)? That was the initial clearance from Delivery but I'm so used to normal intervention by ATC that I'm not absolutely positive any more.
This is not a question of obeying restrictions if given something different by ATC but purely a question of can I follow the entire vertical profile of the SID if not told differently by ATC. The US have a very nice 'climb via' phrase that leaves no doubt in my mind but that's not the case elsewhere and I'd really like to be able to point to a reference for the ICAO means of correctly executing an SID if not otherwise directed by ATC.
Thank you for your perseverance :)