PDA

View Full Version : In-flight straight & level trim of old aircraft


Zonkor
28th Jul 2013, 21:58
Here's a basic stick-and-rudder question.

In short: I'm trying to get a 40-year old Cherokee to flight straight. :) It's a PA28-140 with the barn door wings.

Here's my procedure:

At level flight I keep the wings level with ailerons, then adjust rudder trim until it flies straight hands-free. However, the ball is half a ball width to the left, and the airplane feels like it's going slightly sideways, and the wings go in a slight bank. If I then fix the yaw (I'm aware the ball reading might not be accurate), then I can only get it to fly straight with a slight but notable bank.

Am I doing this right? Any suggestions of how to better keep it straight?

Also, the target should be to get it straight & level hands free and wings level, regardless of ball reading, right?

RTN11
28th Jul 2013, 22:03
sounds like something is bent.

You should be able to fly straight and level and in balance and trim to keep it there in a PA28.

If you trim so you are straight and level and in balance, it sounds like you are then having to use the ailerons to hold the wings level, or perhaps not level, to keep it straight.

If you trim so you are wings level, and straight, then you are not in balance.

Something is wrong if this is happening in a PA28, get it looked at. There may be a tab on the ailerons which can be adjusted on the ground (technically should be done by an engineer) to stop it from rolling when you have wings level and in balance.

Cobalt
28th Jul 2013, 22:15
Also, the target should be to get it straight & level hands free and wings level, regardless of ball reading, right?

The target is to get it s&l with the ball in the middle. Anything else costs a couple of knots cruising speed.

As RTN11 writes, your aircraft needs adjusting... the PA28 gets adjusted in roll by rigging the flap position, which for a qualified mechanic is not hard to do. This assumes that nothing else is "bent".

At level flight I keep the wings level with ailerons, then adjust rudder trim until it flies straight hands-free

Once fixed, the proper technique is to keep the wings level with ailerons, then adjust the rudder trim until the ball is in the middle without you having to press a rudder pedal. If after that you have a more than minimal roll tendency, get it adjusted [or just fly the lower tank half empty, or hand a weight of one side of the yoke ;-)]

Tinstaafl
28th Jul 2013, 23:37
On a dead calm & clear day (or at least no turb & pretty good vis):

* find a good aiming point on the horizon while flying into or out of wind (ie no drift) and a spot or dirt on the windscreen directly in front of you.
* At cruise power & speed in level flight, trim in pitch 1st then, while holding the wings level, use your feet to keep your chosen windscreen spot aligned with the horizon aim point. It may take a few minutes to work out what pressure you need if it is very slight. Don't worry about the ball - it could need adjustment too!
* trim the rudder to relieve your foot pressure while still holding the wings level.
* Identify if you need any aileron input to hold the wings level.

Note: Try to have the aircraft's lateral weight distributed evenly - so no near full one side vs near empty other side fuel tanks

On the ground get your maint. blokes to adjust the rigging and try again. If either the rudder trim or roll rigging is displaced a lot to achieve S&L trimmed flight then you might have a bent airframe.

Johnm
28th Jul 2013, 23:52
It needs rerigging by someone who knows what they are doing. I had a similar problem with my Archer, rerigging at RGV in Gloucester at the annual had it fly straight and level in balance and in trim no problem.

phiggsbroadband
29th Jul 2013, 11:25
HI Cobalt, you say...

As RTN11 writes, your aircraft needs adjusting... the PA28 gets adjusted in roll by rigging the flap position,

Which I think means that each FLAP has its back-stop adjusted to give the desired S+L flight.

Would this be the same for a C172 as we seem to have the same 'problems'.... I have heard someone say that the tips of the AILERONS can be tweaked, but this does not look to be possible (as there is no aileron trim tab.)

RTN11
29th Jul 2013, 11:38
Don't cessnas have a tab on the rudder you can adjust :confused:

dont overfil
29th Jul 2013, 11:51
I am told on Cessnas the incidence of each wing can be adjusted by a cam at the trailing edge of the wing for roll. It is accessable from inside the cabin.

I suspect fine adjustment may be done with the elevators.

For yaw trim it will have a rudder trimmer or an adjustable tab on the rudder.

D.O.

phiggsbroadband
29th Jul 2013, 11:54
Hi, yes they do. The aircraft trim is Ok at full power in a cruise climb; However in a S+L cruise it requires 2 notches of left rudder trim to get the ball in the centre... This then requires some pressure on the yoke to avoid rolling to the left.
I don't think this is related to Pax weight, as it occurs with any loading. just the same as the OPs PA 28 'problem'.

IFMU
30th Jul 2013, 16:26
I have never seen a cam inside a Cessna to adjust wing incidence. The C120/140 has dual struts and roll is adjusted by screwing out one aft rod end on one side. I don't think any of the PA28's I've flown have been trimmed well in roll. Makes it hard for instrument work, so I have used rudder trim and lived with the poor coordination.
Bryan

A and C
30th Jul 2013, 17:41
Most of the stuff above about Cessna's it true there is a cam in the wing root mountings to adjust the incidence.

The only roll adjustment that you can use on a piper is the flaps very little movement of the flaps can produce a lot of trim, IMO this Piper needs all the control setting back to the factory settings and then adjustments made from the factory settings to get it to fly S+L? It should be remembered that you need to set the Aleron neutral settings with a rigging board and tool to set the position of the belcrank.

IFMU
31st Jul 2013, 14:44
I have learned something, thanks. I figured the spar carrythrough design was the same on all 100 series cessnas.
Bryan

Lightning Mate
31st Jul 2013, 15:30
The aircraft trim is Ok at full power in a cruise climb; However in a S+L cruise
it requires 2 notches of left rudder trim

Have you considered the changing dynamic pressure on the fin as a result of changing propeller wash?

There will also be changing propeller torque effect.

Victorian
31st Jul 2013, 16:22
Is it correct that the PA-28-161 (and Maybe other Cherokees) won't return to S&L hands off, whereas the 172R (and maybe other 172's) do? In other words, trim out for best S&L and let go of the controls. Warrior slowly but surely dives off one side or the other with increasing bank. 172 returns to S&L as defined by the trim, even if preturbed from level flight.

At least, this is what happens in the two aircraft that I'm familiar with. Engineers shrug and say, "Yes, that's what it does" about the Warrior. I'm not convinced. Maybe it's a safety feature to keep the pilot awake? In the 172 you could doze until the fuel runs out, but not the Warrior.

Incidentally, I can't see how trimming the flaps is any different from compensating with the ailerons? It will only fly straight on the rudder trim with the ball out by about half a ball. You can get better airspeed by compensating with aileron (requires constant pressure), but that is surely an aileron trim issue, nothing to do with flaps?

Any information gratefully received, since it's an irritating and long term issue.

A and C
31st Jul 2013, 17:14
The ailerons are differential so any adjustment will effect the effect in the turn and make the aircraft turn more quickly in one direction than the other, this is achived by the ineffective crank effect of the belcrank design so Aleron adjustment is not a good idea.

Adjusting the flap slightly has a very measurable effect on the aircraft in roll without effecting the ability to turn, of course it will have secondary effects in yaw and pitch but it is the best way to get the roll issue sorted.......as I said the first thing to do is go back to the book settings and then find out what needs adjusting to get the aircraft to fly S+L.

BackPacker
31st Jul 2013, 17:26
On the other hand, how severe is the roll issue really? It might be that the aircraft is perfectly rigged for S&L flight with 2 or 4 POB. But if you're solo it might have a tendency to roll slightly to the left (assuming you fly LHS). As others said, you might want to look at the weight distribution first, and maybe run the left tank at a lower level than the right tank, to see if that helps.

In any case, rudder trim is not going to fix a roll issue. Rudder trim is there to fix a yaw issue (*). If you want to fix the roll issue you've got to do something with the wing rigging, with a fixed trim tab on an aileron, or maybe by setting up the flaps differentially, as suggested above.

(*) Let me rephrase that: An effective rudder trim will help you fix a yaw issue. But I don't consider the PA28 rudder trim particularly effective. AFAIK nobody uses it.

howard941
31st Jul 2013, 18:41
I was building a nice sized right thigh muscle until I started liberally using rudder trim in the Warrior. It's at least two full turns to the right for a straight 79 knot climb (Fla, summer). Almost a full two turns back at cruise to hold a heading (and the wings never do stay or return to level despite draining the heavy side tank first, distribution etc). Then some left trim for descents.

dubbleyew eight
1st Aug 2013, 06:53
before you start stuffing around with the geometry of the aeroplane answer a few questions.

how old are the engine mount rubbers?
if they sag the engine thrust line will not be as designed.

why the hell do you convince yourself that the balance ball is out of whack?
the instrument is as simple as it could be. a ball in a fluid filled glass tube bolted solidly to the instrument panel. how can it be out of whack???

try flying the thing with the ball centred. I'll bet it flies 5 knots faster in cruise. and starts behaving itself.

cessnas I can trim to fly at an exact speed. pipers with the all flying tail are an impossibility for me. why you expect to trim a piper is a mystery to me.

barit1
2nd Aug 2013, 02:33
Point of clarification: The early Cessna 120-140-170 series were "ragwing" (fabric covered) and so the wing itself had very little torsional stiffness. The lift strut was a "V" strut, and (in common with many other ragwing designs) the outer wing incidence was trimmed by an adjustable fitting on (usually) the aft member of the V strut. (It used to be fairly common to rig both wings with 1 or 2 degrees of washout, to force the wing root to stall first.)

But the 140A and 170A introduced the metal-skinned wing, with enough torsional stiffness that only a single lift strut was needed. Incidence angle was thus established at the wing root. (The C-120 was discontinued about this time)

Tinstaafl
2nd Aug 2013, 05:52
The balance ball will read an error if the instrument isn't aligned in the panel. That's why there's the ability to rotate the instrument by a few degrees left & right.

phiggsbroadband
2nd Aug 2013, 10:53
Hi, the 'Balance Ball' is only the same as a 'Spirit Level'. If it reads level when the plane is sitting on flat tarmac, then it will be Ok in the air.

You would need to park with one wheel in a pretty big rabbit hole for the ball to be over 1 ball out.

Pilot DAR
2nd Aug 2013, 12:19
I took off in the Piper Aztec once, and aircraft I knew fairly well. This time, as I accelerated, it rolled more and more, to the point that I took it back stating something was wrong.

It was, and was very quickly found. Someone had bumped the trailing edge of a flap, and curled down the trailing edge a bit. Only about 3 inches of span were involved, and it did not really damage the flap. The mechanics easily bent it back.

It had acted like a trim tab, and flow that flap a little higher in it's freeplay than the other flap, so the faster I flew, the more trimming effect.

It flew perfectly after the trailing edge fix.

Victorian
2nd Aug 2013, 13:13
Thanks for the responses chaps. Very interesting about the differential aileron.

But to my other question, should it be possible to trim a Warrior for wings level flight 'hands off'? Or is the neutral roll stability a design feature?

Pilot DAR
2nd Aug 2013, 13:37
A well rigged and trimmed Warrior should fly hands and feet off for many minutes at a time. Most don't.

dubbleyew eight
2nd Aug 2013, 13:48
if the aeroplane is yours then it may be worth the effort to find the manual that details the rigging jigs and how to use them.
I have made a set and used them in putting a cherokee back together about 10 years ago. They arent hard to make.
they are made in wood and use bolts for the standoffs.

I wouldnt advise changing any of the settings, just use them to go over the aircraft and check the setups.
the setup jigs remove all doubt about where surfaces should sit.

from memory there are 3 jigs. one for the stabilator, one for the ailerons and one for the flaps.

Desert185
2nd Aug 2013, 15:25
Zonkor:

Until you have the control rigging checked, adjust rudder trim to maintain a constant heading. The ball may or may not be centered. When the rigging is checked, have them also center the ball properly when the fuselage is laterally level (there is an adjustment for that).

Victorian
5th Aug 2013, 09:24
Thanks for all the helpful advice.

I went for a little evening flight in still air and checked the rudder trim. At 2350 rpm, 3000', 105kt, the rudder trim requires small tweaks (say 10-20 deg) to achieve wings level flight. At this point the ball is out by about 1/3rd of a ball width.

Nothing new here - I've flown this plane for 12 years and it's always been the same. But in the past, I've been able to get the Century wing leveller to work and that's fixed the problem. Now the Century is sulking long term, hence the questions.

Correcting this imbalance manually requires constant aileron pressure, which makes hand flying innacurate. So the flap trim sounds like the way to go -thanks.

However, my primary question remains: can the Warrior be trimmed to maintain wings level flight on it's own, or is it a design feature that it rolls off in an ever increasing bank? The 172R that I fly certainly can fly indefinitely wings level, and maybe there's some 'pendulum' effect in play. (I'm not saying constant heading: it will still turn however you trim it. But it will not roll into an incipient spiral dive). But no matter how carefully I tweak the Warrior rudder trim, it still rolls away, albiet gradually. Is this correct behaviour?

Tinstaafl
5th Aug 2013, 15:10
A C172 & a PA28, when rigged correctly, can be trimmed to fly hands off. And they both will spiral dive given sufficient upset. I don't know of any conventional aircraft that is built with roll stability exceeding yaw stability.

dubbleyew eight
5th Aug 2013, 15:21
Victorian I did all my cross country navs in a warrior and I cannot remember anything but the gentlest aileron inputs in straight and level.

I'm almost certain that your warrior has something either out of adjustment or slightly bent.
stick it out on the tarmac one day, flaps up. tweak the aileron on one side so that it matches the flap end. then walk away from the aircraft about 10 paces. then at that distance just walk around the aircraft and look. kneel down squint, whatever but sight along things and see if you can see anything out of plumb.

find another good warrior and do the same.

you might just pick the problem.

a good plumb warrior is a good aeroplane.

btw how do you handle your fuel management? you are keeping the fuel each side in balance aren't you?

phiggsbroadband
6th Aug 2013, 09:31
Hi, if the ball is only out by 1/3 ball then that is not so much of a problem.

If it is 'ball to the left' then it could be caused by low rpm, is it Ok at (75%)2500 rpm? You could try different rpms to see which gets the ball to centre.

It may also be weight unbalance because you are solo, or have the left tank more full than the right.

stevef
6th Aug 2013, 18:53
I remember when we (maintenance organisation) carried out the annual inspection of a Cherokee, the stabilator rigging was found to be well out of limits. System was rigged in accordance with the manual and the subsequent test flight, carried out by a very experienced ex RAF instructor, Queens Flight pilot and one-time Rothmans display team member. Everything found satisfactory.
However, when the owner went to take the aeroplane away, he rejected the take-off and returned, complaining that we'd screwed up the rigging... :confused:
Anyway, as previously stated, flap tweaking is Piper's remedy for correcting wing heaviness. If there are concerns about the aircraft being bent, the simple solution is to have a symmetry check carried out. No big task.