5 Forward 6 Back
28th Jul 2013, 18:27
This came up at work in a crewroom chat the other day, and the NEM thread brought it back to the front of my mind. Very much the stuff of crewroom chats this but my current unit has a small crewroom so I thought I'd throw it out to a wider audience :ok:
Literally, what price would ensure your service for a bit longer if FRIs were put back on the table?
We all agree to certain things within the length of our commissions or engagements, but right now I don't see many people planning on sticking it out for a long career. I know maybe 3 people who're planning on staying in past their next option point, and they've probably not seen the NEM details yet! I know more people now than any point in my career waiting for a PVR exit date or getting ducks in a line before leaving.
Everyone who was offered PAS that I know turned it down, unless they were already stuck in a ROS. Even people on the cusp of promotion are sorting out CVs and considering other options, and why wouldn't they with the NEM revelations? Service only possible to maybe 48 instead of 55, in conjunction with the pension shifting to 60, and the service being able to make you redundant with 12 months notice. I think most people would rather be hunting for that second career on their terms at 38 (post-option) or 35 (post-PVR) rather than unexpectedly at 46!
So even the thrusters on my squadron who were hoping for a good show in November are thinking about leaving, and I presume the situation will be the same in a lot of places. So if Manning came round now and asked you to write your own cheque for a 5 year or longer ROS, what would it be?
Would you stay for 9 years like USAF fighter guys, for $250k, half now and half added to your salary for the period? Would you stay 5 years for a salary boost of £30k per year? Would you need a huge lump sum?
Or would you be another one for whom you can't put a cost on it; and the changes to our conditions simply don't make it worthwhile anymore?
Literally, what price would ensure your service for a bit longer if FRIs were put back on the table?
We all agree to certain things within the length of our commissions or engagements, but right now I don't see many people planning on sticking it out for a long career. I know maybe 3 people who're planning on staying in past their next option point, and they've probably not seen the NEM details yet! I know more people now than any point in my career waiting for a PVR exit date or getting ducks in a line before leaving.
Everyone who was offered PAS that I know turned it down, unless they were already stuck in a ROS. Even people on the cusp of promotion are sorting out CVs and considering other options, and why wouldn't they with the NEM revelations? Service only possible to maybe 48 instead of 55, in conjunction with the pension shifting to 60, and the service being able to make you redundant with 12 months notice. I think most people would rather be hunting for that second career on their terms at 38 (post-option) or 35 (post-PVR) rather than unexpectedly at 46!
So even the thrusters on my squadron who were hoping for a good show in November are thinking about leaving, and I presume the situation will be the same in a lot of places. So if Manning came round now and asked you to write your own cheque for a 5 year or longer ROS, what would it be?
Would you stay for 9 years like USAF fighter guys, for $250k, half now and half added to your salary for the period? Would you stay 5 years for a salary boost of £30k per year? Would you need a huge lump sum?
Or would you be another one for whom you can't put a cost on it; and the changes to our conditions simply don't make it worthwhile anymore?