PDA

View Full Version : Fly a Boeing? Why is right rudder trim needed in cruise?


Straight & Level
2nd Apr 2013, 09:10
Something that I've wondered often but never received a definitive explanation to. Why in the cruise with balanced thrust and fuel do Boeings need a touch of right rudder trim? My experience is on the B757 and B777 but all the variants of the two types are the same. Answers on a post card...

scotbill
2nd Apr 2013, 09:32
One theory (not mine) was that solar heating on one side of the aircraft had a slightly distorting effect on the fuselage

Straight & Level
2nd Apr 2013, 09:50
I've not heard that one. What about a night flight ;)
Other theories are that the cargo doors on the 757 and 777 are on the right side, and in some way this affects the torsional stiffness of the fuselage, hence the need for rudder trim. What about jet efflux? Could that be an explanation. Aerodynamicists?

TURIN
2nd Apr 2013, 10:24
Is it the same for different engine types?
Rollers turn one way, GE/PW the other.
I would expect diferent trim for different engines if it was linked.
Just a thought.

Straight & Level
2nd Apr 2013, 10:48
Good point Turin :D

RB211/RR Trent engines turn clockwise as viewed from the front, whereas GE's turn anti-clockwise.

All the types I've flown generally need a squeeze of right trim, so you are probably right, it's not down to the engines.

jimsmitty01
2nd Apr 2013, 11:01
I have noticed the same on the B737 NG. Always a touch of right rudder trim, some more pronounced than others, but always to the right. So its not just 777 and 757's.

If you look at a 737 from behind on the taxi there is quite a noticeable castering effect. Where the aircraft appears to be crabbing slightly to one side. Don't know if that has anything to do with it??

Lord Spandex Masher
2nd Apr 2013, 11:03
That's to help you out in a cross wind Jim.

STBYRUD
2nd Apr 2013, 11:06
Hmm, I never noticed any tendency towards either the right or the left, on the 737s I have flown some don't need any trim, some a unit left, some half a unit right...

Centaurus
2nd Apr 2013, 11:34
One feasable explanation is it counters the torque of the anti-collision lights:ok:

main_dog
2nd Apr 2013, 11:35
On the B742 and B744 and especially on the B748 I believe it has to do with the differing thermal effects on the steel control rod holding the rudder surface in position vs. the aluminium rib structure. Generally as the aircraft structure cools in climb and cruise it pulls the rudder slightly left requiring correction with right rudder trim, and the opposite occurs in descent.

If the rudder control architecture is similar on all Boeings then this could be it?

SMOC
2nd Apr 2013, 11:46
As main dog said, I've got the Boeing notice on my ipad it's called thermal rudder drift.

Sciolistes
2nd Apr 2013, 12:09
I've noted from time to time that the Captain often sets a little too much left trim during preflight due to the paralax error on the rudder trim indicator as seen from the captain's chair (737).

Bearcat F8F
2nd Apr 2013, 12:20
A theory I developed with a friend of mine who is a 737NG FO:

The cargo doors on a 737 are on the right hand side. The wear and tear reduces the smoothness of the seal, as well as possibly some of the paint work on that side of the aircraft resulting in the boundary layer becoming more turbulent over that section of the fuselage, creating the small yaw effect.

Could be wrong, don't shoot me down :ok:

Straight & Level
2nd Apr 2013, 12:33
Bearcat, I've heard something similar myself, but was wondering if there was anything definitive written by Boeing about this. So far I think SMOC and main_dog have the most plausible explanation:D Any chance of a copy SMOC or a link perhaps? :O

main_dog
2nd Apr 2013, 12:44
Here's an excerpt from a B747-8 rudder system thermal effects presentation:

During climb as ambient the temperature decreases, the aluminum ribs contract faster and to a greater degree than the steel actuator/tab rod.

The aluminum contraction pulls the rudder hinge pivot point closer to the fin rear spar and the rudder surface is held by the steel actuator and therefore pushed to the left.

Rudder Surface will move approximately 0.3 to 0.5 degrees Left depending on conditions during climb.

Tab rod will also experience drift caused by the same phenomena. Lower tab drift is a sum of the main drift and tab drift.

As the aluminum and steel parts stabilize at sub zero cruse temperatures the offset decreases to approximately 0.2 to 0.3 degrees (Rudder Left).

In descent as the ambient temperature increases, the aluminum warms and expands faster than the steel resulting the rudder being pushed to the right.

Rudder Surfaces will move approximately 0.3 to 0.5 degrees Right depending on conditions during descent.

Bearcat F8F
2nd Apr 2013, 13:14
Straight & Level (http://www.pprune.org/members/13078-straight-and-level), yeah and I also found a flaw in my assumptions. If the cargo doors are on the right it should cause a right yaw and hence a LEFT trim input to cancel.

3holelover
2nd Apr 2013, 13:18
I've always heard it was to offset the weight of either the captains wallet, or his watch? Not so? :E

BOAC
2nd Apr 2013, 13:23
Is this just Northern hemisphere by chance? Surely you would need to trim to the right in order to produce the turn? Anyone from 'downunder' awake yet?

No_Speed_Restriction
2nd Apr 2013, 13:23
Has this got anything to do with it....

Link (http://www.google.com.cy/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=thermal%20rudder%20drift&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CEgQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.de%2Fpatents%2Fdownload%2F486312 2_Aircraft_rudder_thermal_compensa.pdf%3Fid%3D9IQrAAAAEBAJ%2 6output%3Dpdf%26sig%3DACfU3U219-1pLdKGuKkRR9hSdeP7fFBcxg%26source%3Dgbs_overview_r%26cad%3D0&ei=9dpaUcnUH-SM4gT-z4C4BQ&usg=AFQjCNHk8bPYjvv0eY_6eObrx0A8VzD87g&bvm=bv.44442042,d.ZWU)

Straight & Level
2nd Apr 2013, 13:54
Good point Bearcat! Thanks for the excerpt Main_dog, I think that explains it reasonably well :ok:

BOAC: Most of my flying is in the Northern Hemisphere. Care to expand on your question? I'm not sure I follow your logic :O

99jolegg
2nd Apr 2013, 14:03
I know you're all talking Boeing, but the Airbus FCOM says to expect rudder trim to reside between 2.3 units Left and 1.0 units Right in the cruise. I rarely see it, if ever, sitting to the right. It's nearly always left trim.

I mention it because the cargo doors are on the right side of the A320 too so you wouldn't expect left rudder trim if this theory was true.

BOAC
2nd Apr 2013, 14:18
Care to expand on your question? I'm not sure I follow your logic - Coriolis, old chap. I use to notice the amount of trim reducing as I neared Banjul in the old days.

Straight & Level
2nd Apr 2013, 14:33
Coriolis, old chap. I use to notice the amount of trim reducing as I neared Banjul in the old days.

Ah! Most of my flying is East/West rather than North/South so I haven't noticed anything significant. Interesting theory though!

TURIN
2nd Apr 2013, 22:48
Jim smitty.
The 737 crabbing is because the landing gear design includes a shimmy damper that permits the mlg to castor left or right.

bubbers44
2nd Apr 2013, 23:03
Since nobody knows if this is even real and probably isn't, A
OA changes some at cruise so the slight power reduction at cruise or AOA change is the only thing different. P factor on a prop airplane required right rudder in a climb and not in cruise. If the engine rotates the counterclockwise direction I guess the opposite would be true but since it goes out the same exhaust the only effect would be the intake pulling air further out on one engine vs the other.

BARKINGMAD
2nd Apr 2013, 23:12
The reason for the B737 appearing to taxy with drift is because the MLG torque links have a damped mechanism to allow limited castoring of the mainwheels.

If you are lucky enough to get close to one, check the "knee-joint" at the front of the MLG and you'll see the shiny portion of the damper, a bit like an oleo.

I try to reassure my F/Os when they're getting twitched about X-wind landings, that the airframe owns the first 15 knots of crosswind, as per autolands, and they've just got to sort the other 18/20 depending on winglets!

So far it seems to reassure them and me................:ok:

JammedStab
3rd Apr 2013, 00:09
Is this the exact same on the 737-200 series.

misd-agin
3rd Apr 2013, 02:32
Right rudder trim north of the equator. Left rudder trim south of the equator.

Been that way ever since they discovered the equator and modern plumbing.

bubbers44
3rd Apr 2013, 02:53
None of us believe that because once established in flight we all know no rudder is required no matter what the wind is doing. Coriolis effect only affects how the atmosphere circulates in the northern and southern hemisphere, not how you have to fly your airplane. Maybe you are just kidding but if you aren't get a book out and read how it works.

jxk
3rd Apr 2013, 03:56
Does the amount of trim required get any worse at the very beginning of April?

Turbavykas
3rd Apr 2013, 06:16
None of us believe that because once established in flight we all know no rudder is required no matter what the wind is doing. Coriolis effect only affects how the atmosphere circulates in the northern and southern hemisphere, not how you have to fly your airplane. Maybe you are just kidding but if you aren't get a book out and read how it works.

Coriolis effect effects everything!

Straight & Level
3rd Apr 2013, 06:40
So, this thread is taking an interesting 'turn'. Pun intended ;)

I still maintain that the likely culprit is uneven cooling in the rudder actuator mechanism, as do Boeing it seems (thanks SMOC and main_dog). Now granted, it's been a while since I studied my ATPL theory subjects but I'm struggling to understand how Coriolis affects the rudder trim required in steady-state cruise.

Uplinker
3rd Apr 2013, 08:29
once established in flight we all know no rudder is required no matter what the wind is doing.

Bubbers old chap, you are probably right about the coriolis effect, but I think you will find that a small amount of rudder is required in the cruise to trim out side-slip?

Lord Spandex Masher
3rd Apr 2013, 10:18
He's actually wrong about coriolis and P factor on a turbo prop.

Anyway, there is a simple reason for this rudder trim phenomenon and that is because the right hand engine is started first the right hand thrust pixies are that little bit more warmed up than lefties and, therefore, produce that little bit more thrust, hence yaw, hence trim required. Easy.

:ok:

Uplinker
3rd Apr 2013, 10:44
Ah yes, the pixies!

I don't know the answer to the coriolis question, but if a mass of air moving within the atmosphere above the planet is affected by the coriolis force and veers slightly, then why not an aircraft also moving in the atmosphere above the planet?

Indeed - I have just checked my dictionary, and its' definition of coriolis is; "A hypothetical force used to explain the deflection in the path of a body moving relative to the earth"


(If aircraft are affected by this, I would not have thought that rudder trim is the answer - the aircraft will account for it by comparing its required track with its actual track and adjust heading accordingly. Rudder trim is used to adjust for any slight variations in the airframe - one wing fractionally more draggy than the other - asymmetric fuselage drag etc.)

flyingchanges
3rd Apr 2013, 12:20
I find that every one of our -800s needs a bit of left in the climb and back to 0 in cruise.

Lord Spandex Masher
3rd Apr 2013, 12:37
That's because of the reduced demand on each sides' pixies allowing them to provide exactly the same thermal efficiency and, therefore, thrust. :ok:

bubbers44
3rd Apr 2013, 23:01
P factor was taught when I was learning and the same laws apply now. Trim once in an ocean of air doesn't compensate for wind, only for misrigging or assymetrical thrust. A jet engine, if it has any AOA, would have slightly more intake on the downward spinning fan but I have never noticed enough to care. I think a lot of folks here are pulling our leg to see if we will bite. Then we have a few that....never mind.

bubbers44
4th Apr 2013, 00:54
I guess it is their head they can put it anywhere they want.

stallfail
4th Apr 2013, 02:05
An airplane in steady cruising flight may require some degree of
lateral and/or directional trim inputs to minimize drag. The
trim requirement can arise from improper rigging of flight
controls after maintenance, internal load distribution, fuel
unbalance, and engine thrust setting imbalance. The degree of
trim inputs required will depend on two basic factors: 1) The
degree of controls misrig, lateral unbalance, etc., and 2) Trim
technique employed

bubbers44
4th Apr 2013, 03:19
I agree. trim is mainly for rigging problems, fuel imbalance and s=assymetrical thrust to synch engine rpm but never for in flight winds because once in the flow you need none. Only after take off or before landing do you need to do much with an airline rudder in the air. The yaw damper takes care of turns, etc. Be careful when you go back to the J3. The best way to trim a jet is synch the engines and use the rudder trim to make the wings level. One captain I had put our inclinometer ball in the middle and flew in a slip so I got a screwdriver and leveled the inclinometer to make him fly straight. We saved fuel and drinks were not sliding off the table. I thought everybody knew that.

stilton
4th Apr 2013, 05:07
How exactly did you 'level the inclinometer with a screwdriver ?

bubbers44
4th Apr 2013, 15:04
I put a small screwdriver in my flight bag so when my captain insisted on flying with one wing up with the ball centered on the 737 200 when we were level on the ramp I used the screwdriver to put his ball in the middle and it worked every time. The inclinometer in the 737 200 had a screw on each side to level it. He was always out of the cockpit of course when I did it. I just wanted our airplane to fly level as it should be flown.

3holelover
4th Apr 2013, 15:22
I thought if the ball was in the middle that means you are NOT slipping? (providing slip indicator is accurately adjusted) "when we were level on the ramp I used the screwdriver to put his ball in the middle" As it should have been anyway. No?

Lord Spandex Masher
4th Apr 2013, 15:29
Awesome Bubbers. Haven't you heard of talking?

Also you understand what a Tech Log is? And engineers?

Tay Cough
4th Apr 2013, 16:58
It's actually less complicated than that.

Remember the Boeing factory is one of the largest (certainly one of the longest) buildings in the world. It was built before the days of laser surveys and as a result has a very slight curve built into it. Due to the direction of the production line, this manifests itself in microscopically curved aircraft hence the need for trim.









I just wish I'd thought of this a few days ago. :}

sevenstrokeroll
4th Apr 2013, 19:27
bubbers is right about P factor...climb...right rudder, cruise nothing, left rudder in descent (9f any).

now, I think the planes, all planes are a bit twisted, so trim it out and good luck.

but if you do ask yourself this question...which side of the plane do you start first? which tank provides fuel to the apu?

80-87
6th Apr 2013, 05:54
We had a fleet of 23 737-200s and all except one, required right rudder trim in climb, some in cruise and none in descent. We had a close relationship with the engineering guys and the rigging department was sure that the trims were set to neutral.

We are taught to believe that there is no torque on jet engines, but considering this discussion isn't a 'one off', maybe there is some credibility in it. We used to toss this one around over a coffee and in the bar a lot and we all felt that considering the amount of power/weight generated, torque did have an influence.

flyingchanges
6th Apr 2013, 12:04
I really doubt a 200lb lateral imbalance is going to be noticed on a 160,000lb 737-800.

Desert185
6th Apr 2013, 15:34
I like bubbers' solution. Sometimes that is the most expeditious.

So many aircraft in the fleet have balls not leveled properly that I have relegated to using the ball for an engine-out and the heading for rudder trim. I have only worked one place where MX has leveled the slip/skid indicator properly on both sides.

Only use the ball if you can confirm center with wings level (autopilot off) and no heading change. Nice to recheck trim as fuel burns off on a long flight.

roulishollandais
6th Apr 2013, 19:11
if this is even real and probably isn't,
Pilots'level decreasing quickly, they will soon have to navigate like Old Vikings going to America : maintaining constant latitude by keeping constant height of the star Polaris watched on the Starboard (of course)! Right trim gives Givry correction to stay on loxodromic course...

beginning of april
and specially april 1.:p

bubbers44
7th Apr 2013, 02:05
I know leveling the inclinometer is not the copilots job but it made my captain fly wings level again. I used the attitude indicator to make the wings level on heading when I was captain but FO's can only help the captain so much when they have their technique of ball in middle so fixed it. The captain would never let me make a maintenance call to fix a crooked inclinometer so I did. That is what a good FO does, right?

roulishollandais
7th Apr 2013, 08:17
The captain would never let me make a maintenance call to fix a crooked inclinometer so I did. That is what a good FO does, right?
Right! Ability to survive is the first skill of a pilot.
Surviving needs not survive but live ;)

bubbers44
7th Apr 2013, 22:26
An unlevel inclinometer is safe just not efficient if the other pilot insists on using it to trim if it is not adjusted properly. Holding a constant heading with one wing down I am sure makes no sense to anybody but some of my captains back then were taught that way. A glass of water on a level surface would do the same thing. A low wing requires opposite rudder so more drag and more fuel burn.

bubbers44
7th Apr 2013, 22:58
Remember a long time ago when we all knew how to do a forward slip and if we were high slip off altitude with no speed change with the drag and the side slip for a crosswind which was basically the same thing but reference was a bit different? Training was different then but aerodynamics remains the same, right aileron,left rudder and more drag. It sucks in cruise though.

ericlarouge
8th Apr 2013, 13:13
e never new that . and flew RR and Prat (they turned differen directions , although the P n W.was only on a short lease

misd-agin
8th Apr 2013, 13:23
They could fix the problem by putting a RR engine on one wing and a GE/PW on the other wing.

3holelover
8th Apr 2013, 13:36
Naw, that'd just cause a new problem as that silly arsed, backwards turning, three-spooled, RR mongrel motor turns so much fuel into smoke on start-up there'd be perpetual fuel imbalances. :p

misd-agin
8th Apr 2013, 21:16
There's always a 'work around'. They could add oil to the exhaust of the GE/PW so that it smoked too.

Fil
15th Apr 2013, 15:47
[QUOTE] Is it the same for different engine types?
Rollers turn one way, GE/PW the other.
I would expect diferent trim for different engines if it was linked.
Just a thought.
/QUOTE]

We have both Roller and GE's on our 777's and they both required RIGHT rudder trim.

fantom
15th Apr 2013, 16:13
I'd just like to point out that Airbuses don't taxi sideways or need trim to fly straight, and all spares are genuine. Also, if you knock on the fuselage,
the B team is soft but the A team will hurt your knuckles.

justanotherflyer
15th Apr 2013, 17:45
Due to the direction of the production line, this manifests itself in microscopically curved aircraft hence the need for trim.

Ideal perhaps for accelerating along Mumbai's curved center line (http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-07-14/india/28307564_1_secondary-runways-main-runway-mumbai-airport).

go-around flap 15
15th Apr 2013, 20:43
Funnily enough I was having this discussion with a v. knowledgable LTC last week. He suggested it was down to the design of the rudder control cables mechanism expanding/contracting with the change in temperature.