PDA

View Full Version : ANO 2009 Schedule 7 Part A Section 2


GGT
5th Sep 2012, 21:13
Sorry about the dry topic but it's bugging me, big time!

This section (JAR-FCL licence priveleges) was deleted a few weeks ago (understandably, due to the arrival of EASA). My question is, where do I now find the information that was in that section? CAP804 seems to be all about licencing issues, and little about privileges, despite what it hints at in places. Internet searches for Regulations 1178/2011, 290/2012, EASA Aircrew Regulation (alluded to in CAP804) and EASA Part-FCL (can anyone tell me where that resides, if it exists?) turn up documents of little relevance or 404 errors :ugh:

To put this another way, Bloggs asks me to state the minimum flight visibilities permissable with his PPL(A) that he might achieve in a year or so. I offer (what I think, or at least thought, I'm unsure now) is the answer. Bloggs asks me to show him the legal basis for this. I can't. It's not in the ANO any more. Section 1 UK licences is still there, but that's irrelevant to a new Bloggs :confused:

This just can't disappear: it must be written somewhere, or are we now deferring upwards to ICAO docs. Can any of you Legal Beagles enlighten me :{

Thanks in advance, GGT.

Whopity
6th Sep 2012, 11:43
Non Commercial Ops Annex VII (http://www.easa.europa.eu/agency-measures/docs/opinions/2012/01/Part-NCO%20IR.pdf)

Bloggs asks me to state the minimum flight visibilities permissable with his PPL(A)
1500 metres if he has an old JAA licence but still 3 K on a UK National Licence

GGT
7th Sep 2012, 18:16
Whopity, thank you for your reply and the link. I hope you'll bear with me because I'm clearly not getting to grips with this. I've looked through Annex VII that you pointed me to and nowhere in it can I find the source of your comment "1500 metres if he has an old JAA licence but still 3 K on a UK National Licence". Have I missed it or have I missed something more fundamental? Apologies for being so dim. I think you're going to have to get the puppets out for me on this one :O. Thank you in anticipation.

GGT

Whopity
14th Sep 2012, 19:55
1500 metres is the VFR minima below 3000ft clear of cloud etc. A UK PPL holder was further limited by the licence privilege which restricted it to 3K. This restriction did not apply to a JAA licence issued by a State other than the UK and the restriction is not there in an EASA licence, so effectively its 1500 metres by default rather than a specified privilege.

xrayalpha
14th Sep 2012, 21:05
Or 5k if a UK NPPL SSEA

(or 3k if a UK NPPL Micro - why??)

Whopity
15th Sep 2012, 08:14
The microlight was in line with the old UPK PPL and someone considered that a NPPL should have a different limit but that was a licence proposed by Industry not the Regulator!

BEagle
17th Sep 2012, 08:33
NPPL Class Ratings were desgined to be as simple as possible - hence the visibility limits were appropriate for people with limited training.

3 km might be fine in a single seat microlight quietly pottering along at 50 KIAS, but it isn't a lot at 139.9 KIAS in a 2 tonne aeroplane with 3 passengers! The industry-defined SSEA Class Rating was intended to protect such people from themselves....and the CAA agreed.

More modern microlights are a deal faster than 50 KIAS and yes, I know they often out perform a Cessna 152. But don't make too much of an issue about that, or someone might well ask why they're not regulated in the same manner. And you wouldn't want that....:=

In Brave New €uroland, even with a LAPL(A), if visual with the surface and flying at or below 140 KIAS and at or below 3000 ft, you can fly in only 1500 m visibility if you really want to - with passengers. That's 30% of the NPPL SSEA limit. You can also fly above 8/8 cloud, assuming that you managed to find a hole big enough to get there in VMC in the first place....... But hey, it must be safer if the €uropean Aviation Safety Agency says so.....:rolleyes:

GGT
17th Sep 2012, 19:35
Whopity, thank you for your reply once again and your patience. I think the muddy water that is my mind might just be clearing on this one with the benefit of your input. I'll declare what I think things to be:

The EASA PPL(A) minima are simply the VMC minima;

To take things a little further;

Part-FCL.600 says a pilot needs an IR to fly IFR;

To conclude;

The old trick question "can a PPL holder fly in IMC without an instrument qualification" (as I understood it, yes, in class G airspace above 3000ft with a visibility of 3-5km and complying with the distance from cloud stuff) is now superfluous, because they can't.

Am I there?

GGT

Whopity
17th Sep 2012, 19:58
The old trick question "can a PPL holder fly in IMC without an instrument qualification" Actually you mean IFR not IMC. To fly in IMC you need an appropriate qualification however; a UK National Licence holder could fly IFR outside controlled airspace withou any instrument qualification. A JAA licence holder has never had that privilege as the ANO stated that the licence was subject to JAR-FCL 1.175, which stated you cannot fly IFR without an Instrument qualification, even in VMC. This of course has transferred across to EASA and even prevented night flying without the exemption that has now been issued.

Mickey Kaye
18th Sep 2012, 07:10
“NPPL Class Ratings were desgined to be as simple as possible”

I don’t think that was the case it would have been simpler if they were the same.

“hence the visibility limits were appropriate for people with limited training”

I disagree regardless of the training requirements people teach NPPL students to effectively the same standard as PPL students. No one is going to let someone loose who isn’t safe.

“But hey, it must be safer if the €uropean Aviation Safety Agency says so....”

Is there evidence to support this statement? - It must be possible to compare data between countries that have different minimums

GGT
18th Sep 2012, 18:51
Oh no! Not the IMC/IFR schoolboy error, at my age too, and on a public forum. Doh! You are of course quite right again, Whopity.

All this stemmed from a discussion about Standards Document 10 Air Law question 11 which I now see I mis-read and erroneously drew a conclusion from that is not there.

Thanks again Whopity for so clearly outlining some basic principles. Your air law is unnervingly good!

GGT

gefferzz
10th Oct 2012, 14:04
CAP 804 Part 1 Section 7 Part B