nomorecatering
30th May 2010, 04:06
Just watched a video on the development of direct fuel engection in the automotive world. Some of the advantages of this include.
Fuel directed straight into the cylinder similar to diesel engines, at 26,000 psi give extreamly fine atomisation. Addtionally, the injection sequence can be fine tuned as required. Indeed the injecto could give up to 5 short pulses instead of one squirt.
The atomisation sequence gives a large cooling effect on the air in the cylinder, allowing the engineers to raise the compression ratio from 10.0:1 to 10.5:1
The Porsche engineers say the new direct injection engines are more powerful yet more fuel efficient due to direct injection. The change over on the 911 gives a 40 hp power boost.
So my question is, if this technology could be parlayed into aircraft piston engines, could we see a similar gain. Note that Lycommings new Ie 2 engines feature a sequenial fuel injection system off a common rail, rather than the continuous flow settup from a fuel flow divider as is traditional.
Thoughts anyone.
Fuel directed straight into the cylinder similar to diesel engines, at 26,000 psi give extreamly fine atomisation. Addtionally, the injection sequence can be fine tuned as required. Indeed the injecto could give up to 5 short pulses instead of one squirt.
The atomisation sequence gives a large cooling effect on the air in the cylinder, allowing the engineers to raise the compression ratio from 10.0:1 to 10.5:1
The Porsche engineers say the new direct injection engines are more powerful yet more fuel efficient due to direct injection. The change over on the 911 gives a 40 hp power boost.
So my question is, if this technology could be parlayed into aircraft piston engines, could we see a similar gain. Note that Lycommings new Ie 2 engines feature a sequenial fuel injection system off a common rail, rather than the continuous flow settup from a fuel flow divider as is traditional.
Thoughts anyone.