bealine
17th Apr 2010, 13:35
A thought struck me this morning as I watched the Thames Valley Police helicopter patrol the M4 corridor, probably hunting the cash cow - the odd speeding motorist - and a thought struck me.
How about pressing guys like "Air Atlantique"( Welcome to Classic Flying in the de Havilland Dragon Rapide (http://www.classicflight.com/) ) (sorry, they now call themselves "Classic Flight") into service, with piston engined aircraft, which fly below the dangerous layer, to shuttle passengers from London to and from Prestwick or Aldergrove, the two airports capable of handling large wide-bodied aeroplanes and the first two likely to obtain a lifting of the "no fly" instruction?
I'm sure stranded people would welcome the opportunity of being able to get on the move and, given that these are extraordinary circumstances, the government (through the EC) should pay "Classic Flight" and any other piston-engine operators who could be pressed into service, and recompense the airlines who have entered into the spirit of the EC Charter and provided acommodation and refreshment to stranded travellers.
Is there any reason why aircraft, like the DC3's which have a reasonable passenger and luggage capacity, designed to fly at low-altitudes should still be subject to a "no-fly" restriction?
How about pressing guys like "Air Atlantique"( Welcome to Classic Flying in the de Havilland Dragon Rapide (http://www.classicflight.com/) ) (sorry, they now call themselves "Classic Flight") into service, with piston engined aircraft, which fly below the dangerous layer, to shuttle passengers from London to and from Prestwick or Aldergrove, the two airports capable of handling large wide-bodied aeroplanes and the first two likely to obtain a lifting of the "no fly" instruction?
I'm sure stranded people would welcome the opportunity of being able to get on the move and, given that these are extraordinary circumstances, the government (through the EC) should pay "Classic Flight" and any other piston-engine operators who could be pressed into service, and recompense the airlines who have entered into the spirit of the EC Charter and provided acommodation and refreshment to stranded travellers.
Is there any reason why aircraft, like the DC3's which have a reasonable passenger and luggage capacity, designed to fly at low-altitudes should still be subject to a "no-fly" restriction?