BigGrecian
14th Apr 2010, 20:07
Examiners examining students they instruct under EASA
I know it's too late (unfortuantely) for comments on the EASA proposals but does anyone think the proposal under FCL1.005 at
http://www.easa.eu.int/ws_prod/r/doc...Appendices.pdf
is too much instruction.
If you look through the comments you will see that those who commented where from Balloon and microlight backgrounds where it may not be possible to achieve examiner impartiality due small numbers.
However in aeroplane (and helicopter - but don't have much knowledge on this are) I think that there is no reason why the examiner should have conducted any of the training. There are plenty of examiners around, and also plenty of experienced instructors to pass on their experience.
Maybe I'm trying to keep it to impartial?
Thoughts....?
I know it's too late (unfortuantely) for comments on the EASA proposals but does anyone think the proposal under FCL1.005 at
http://www.easa.eu.int/ws_prod/r/doc...Appendices.pdf
is too much instruction.
If you look through the comments you will see that those who commented where from Balloon and microlight backgrounds where it may not be possible to achieve examiner impartiality due small numbers.
However in aeroplane (and helicopter - but don't have much knowledge on this are) I think that there is no reason why the examiner should have conducted any of the training. There are plenty of examiners around, and also plenty of experienced instructors to pass on their experience.
Maybe I'm trying to keep it to impartial?
Thoughts....?