Doors to Automatic
28th Dec 2009, 16:47
Well not unsafe but perhaps less safe than their standard-length counterparts?
I was reading again about the less than perfect landing personality of the 737-800 over on the AA Jamaica crash thread (the subject has been covered many times before) and it got me wondering if stretched aircraft are less stable/safe than average.
There seem to be a lot of overrun incidents with the 737-800, which by all accounts is a handful to land.
A lot of hard landings involving the A321.
And of course our old friend the MD-11 which seems to spend half its life pretending it's in Australia!
By contrast incidents involving the A318/319 and 737-500/-600 are almost unheard of.
Proefessional opnions would be interesting, non-professional ones optional ......
I was reading again about the less than perfect landing personality of the 737-800 over on the AA Jamaica crash thread (the subject has been covered many times before) and it got me wondering if stretched aircraft are less stable/safe than average.
There seem to be a lot of overrun incidents with the 737-800, which by all accounts is a handful to land.
A lot of hard landings involving the A321.
And of course our old friend the MD-11 which seems to spend half its life pretending it's in Australia!
By contrast incidents involving the A318/319 and 737-500/-600 are almost unheard of.
Proefessional opnions would be interesting, non-professional ones optional ......