PDA

View Full Version : 777 Jnb ?


Rook
18th Sep 2009, 07:40
It looks like the 777 isn't doing JNB this winter, is this right?

nitpicker330
18th Sep 2009, 08:08
Winter here means summer down there!!

Too hot for the ER to lift any decent payload without having to go via BKK.

It's ok up to about 22c then it gets interesting........

asianeagle
18th Sep 2009, 12:14
temp bases being offered for 744, so probably answers your question:ok:

Joker's Wild
18th Sep 2009, 12:44
Sorry, just can't help but asking, above 22C makes life "interesting" for something like a T7ER??? :confused:

jonathon68
18th Sep 2009, 13:11
Twins have lots of extra performance compared to quads, until one of the engines stops. :eek:

Hence at hot/high airports take off weight may have to be limited to leave sufficient performance on one engine.

Basically that means payload (and subload passengers) left behind, or less fuel carried and a tech stop (BKK) on the way home.

Jo's is 5500 feet above mean sea level, and with (southern hemisphere) summer temperatures it can become quite limiting for twin operations. From what I hear the 340-300 wasn't much better!

B-HKD
18th Sep 2009, 18:11
On the other hand 77W is replacing 744 on the second daily LAX flight for the winter.

Rook
18th Sep 2009, 22:35
Great, more LAX hotel.:rolleyes:

hopefully 777 starts something Europe as the planes roll in next year.

Joker's Wild
19th Sep 2009, 01:02
jonathon68

Thanks for that, 5500 amsl will certainly do it, was unaware JNB sat that high.

Cheers,

JW

boxjockey
19th Sep 2009, 05:54
Apparently 6 fewer 777s as the company is leasing them back to someone? I think I read that correctly on the news update about HAECO? Someone please tell me if I'm wrong.

BusyB
19th Sep 2009, 09:50
You are wrong. It was a sale and leaseback deal.:ok:

Humber10
19th Sep 2009, 10:35
swire did get their HAECO shares below market value though.... but cx needed the cash. :}

goathead
24th Sep 2009, 10:18
my suggestion
Hong kong - JNB- CAPETOWN - stop in for some with my brewskis with my boets - AND THEN ON TO HKG ! then we can lift as much as we want to !
LOL , get me that job in planning :ok:

nitpicker330
24th Sep 2009, 10:39
Line Ops and Airline Planning have crunched the numbers doing exactly that, it didn't make enough money to make it worthwhile I'm told.

geh065
24th Sep 2009, 13:39
"enough money" being the all-too common key point. Cathay don't seem to start any new route until they can make bucket loads.

Tinwacker
24th Sep 2009, 16:58
Quote:
Jo's is 5500 feet above mean sea level, and with (southern hemisphere) summer temperatures it can become quite limiting for twin operations.
From what I hear the 340-300 wasn't much better!

Jon68, the 340-300 aircraft with hairdryers were so poor that during the J'burg summer B744 aircraft had to be used. The CFM56 things were frequently limited on EGT margin and hitting 950 - 960'C during t/off. Such that MC had all these engines on watch to keep the worst aircraft off this route until a core wash could be done to attempt to regain some margin. A battle never lost he said!:rolleyes::rolleyes:

HKJunkie
24th Sep 2009, 19:31
The 340 did well on the JHB route operating in the hottest months. True Maintenance procedures suggested by CFMI were in place to assist the operation but that is what maintenance should be able to do

Captain Dart
24th Sep 2009, 21:17
Cooda, shooda, wooda...kept the A340-600's to operate JNB all year round, with based Jaapies to operate them (who'll fly for food).

404 Titan
24th Sep 2009, 23:26
HKJunkie

Are you suggesting the A340 was operated all year round to JNB? I’ve been here a while now and on the bus the whole time and don’t recall it doing that.

LongTimeInCX
25th Sep 2009, 02:41
404titan, your memory does not fail you.
The route was initially flown only by the -400 from about 1991.
Later in the 90's, the scarebus was put on during the 'cool' season.
The periods HK junkie may be refering to are possibly the month before or just after the changover. Indeed these months could be hot, and departures were often 'interesting'.
The extrapolation of quickly rising temperatures to guestimate RTOW coupled with the anticipated changes in wind for sched dep time, were things you didnt want to get wrong, as the TO was often at a realistic max weight.
Many crew often mused that the a/c frequently seemed above MTOW.
If one adds in the unknown factor of 200 big meat eating South Africans who's combined weight was an unknown, but a negative factor, it often combined to give an individual for whom it was his first Joberg departure, the widest eyes at V1, and the tighest sheepskin grabbing sphincter at Vr, only relieved, but incredulous at accel alt, that the aircraft didn't accelerate on profile.
Occasionaly a level accel had to be flown, and on one occasion(maybe 250 big meat eaters), I heard a 1-200'/min descent was needed for to accel past first flap retraction speed.
But of course the aircraft would still get airborne with an eng fail just after V1, ......wouldn't it??:sad:

neville_nobody
29th Sep 2009, 04:03
How do V Oz then expect to fly direct to Melbourne which is actually further?

Comoman
29th Sep 2009, 04:59
By stopping off in Perth?

404 Titan
29th Sep 2009, 05:36
neville_nobody

Great Circle Distance:

MEL-JNB = 5582.3 nm
HKG-JNB = 5762.2 nm

How will V Aus carry a full load during the summer months? Tech stop in Perth most likely. Winter shouldn't be a problem non stop.

davidash
29th Sep 2009, 06:09
It will be interesting to see which airlines use the new Durban airport (open early next year) which is at sea level. Surely anyone going out east from RSA must consider it as an option - even if only in summer.

neville_nobody
29th Sep 2009, 10:29
404 I didn't explain myself clearly there, JNB-MEL is longer for a 777 as it won't make the great circle track due ETOPS.

404 Titan
29th Sep 2009, 14:28
neville_nobody

I will admit 207 minutes ETOPS which is currently the limit on the 777-300ER may be a problem. 240 minutes is pending though and as can be seen it isn’t a problem from Perth and only requires a slight diversion North to remain inside 240 minutes of a suitable alternate from Melbourne.

http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk206/ausexpat00/gcmap.gif

Airports used to support ETOPS:

Code Location
MEL Melbourne [Tullamarine Intl], Vic, AU
JNB Johannesburg [Oliver Reginald Tambo Intl (Jan Smuts Intl)], ZA
PER Perth [Intl], WA, AU
MRU Mauritius [Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Intl], MU
SEZ Mahé [Seychelles Intl], Mahé Island, SC
MLE Malé [Intl], Hululé Island, MV
CGK Jakarta [Soekarno-Hatta Intl], ID

gofor
1st Oct 2009, 20:29
The V Oz to MEL on the 777 is no sweat as long as the departure is in the evening where temperatures in summer drop below 20degC. CX to HKG want the 1pm dep slot:rolleyes:

404 Titan
2nd Oct 2009, 00:21
gofor

With an average minimum temperature during the hottest time of the year of 14°C, you could expect the temperature to be around 20°C by the departure time of 8:40pm. A quick look at an RTOW for one of our 777-300ER’s out of JNB reveals a max ATOW of 320.3T for RWY 21R (up hill), 20°C, 1013, 0 Wind, F15, Packs Off or APU to Packs, Alt CG ≥ 31.2% and TO Bump. The max structural TOW for our ER’s is 351.53T so there is still quite a weight penalty (31.23T) to be suffered at this time of the day. If you compare this to one of our 400’s with the same conditions the weight penalty is about 22T’s.