PDA

View Full Version : LH A340-300 Airbus takes wrong taxiway - Kolkata


Diesel Fitter
27th Oct 2008, 08:41
KOLKATA: A blinding downpour and perhaps an erroneous marking of the taxi-bay at Kolkata airport nearly triggered a mishap in the wee hours of
Sunday. A Lufthansa flight, bound for Frankfurt with 230 passengers on board, took a wrong turn while taxing for takeoff and was stopped in the nick of time.

It was around 1.07 am that flight LH 751 pushed back from parking bay 43 and started taxing towards the primary runway, taking taxiway C. But on reaching taxibay B, the pilot suddenly took a left turn towards the secondary runway instead of heading straight to the take-off point on the primary runway.

The nose wheel of the runway had already entered the wrong taxiway and the rear wheels were just about to roll in when an alert air traffic controller noticed it from the tower. He raised an alarm and the pilot was stopped short of a no-go zone.

“It was raining hard and the secondary runway was under maintenance work. Fortunately, the traffic control official noticed it at the right time, Otherwise there was a high possibility of a disaster,” said an apron control official.

The plane would have run into double trouble: the secondary runway was being repaired and taxiway B is too narrow (used only by ATR aircraft) to handle the 84-ft wheelbase of the Airbus A340-300.

“Had the plane entered the taxiway the rear wheel would have hit the grass and the aircraft could have been grounded,” said an AAI official.

As air traffic control alerted the ground support of both the Airports Authority of India and Lufthansa, there was a scramble to rush to the spot with a ‘follow-me’ van, which guides the pilot to make way through the runway area.

For the next 40 minutes, it was a tough yet delicate task for the officials to guide the 250-tonne aircraft to the right track and the flight finally took off at 1.40 am — 35 minutes behind schedule.

Although the exact reasons behind the near-mishap is not known yet, airport officials suspect the pilot may not have been able to track the marking of the taxiway due to the incessant rainfall.

“The pilot is very experienced but has flown very rarely to Kolkata. Perhaps, he was not accustomed to the runway zone of this airport,” said a Lufthansa Airlines official.

Veteran pilots and air safety officials of other airlines also agree that this may be the reason for the aircraft taking the wrong turn. “Generally, a pilot, who is flying to and from a airport he is not accustomed to, religiously follows the guide maps to taxi down the apron area. Perhaps the marking was not right and the rainfall made visibility difficult,” said a veteran pilot from Kolkata.
Airbus takes a wrong turn-Kolkata -Cities-The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Kolkata_/Airbus_takes_a_wrong_turn/articleshow/3644232.cms)

sleeper
27th Oct 2008, 09:42
ATC, well done!

White Knight
27th Oct 2008, 09:51
Well - from much experience with CCU I can assure that the markings are not easy to follow in the dark when it's dry - let alone wet...... Much like many other airfields in the subcontinent:ugh:

FrequentSLF
27th Oct 2008, 09:53
Knowing quite well CCU as SLF I would wait to hear more details about what happened...I not confident that the article reports the full complete facts.

welliewanger
27th Oct 2008, 09:54
It's an easy mistake to make. I tried taxying in the sim in 250m vis. Couldn't find the runway (displaced threshold, no markings). I remarked "You can see how runway incursions happen in these conditions." And then realized I'd just crossed the runway!:D

UP and Down Operator
27th Oct 2008, 09:56
Can this really be classified as news?? :hmm:

Come on guys, everybody have been about to take a wrong turn on a taxiway in their career...... this is just daft to bring on pprune :zzz::zzz::zzz:

... damn, i can't even spell this morning... need some coffee :ok:

Rainboe
27th Oct 2008, 11:00
Dreadful weather, night, puddled water ('puddled'? It goes into a lake) with absolutley no taxiway lines visible, turning on taxi lights achieves nothing as light is reflected away, torrential rain, sitting there with wet feet. Anyone who operates there knows the score. Greatest sympathy guys, but hardly 'newsworthy'!

Wonder who did the walkround?

groundbum
27th Oct 2008, 12:38
given that the average family car can have a tomtom satnav accurate to a few feet for £80, it seems really weird that we keep reading of airliners on the wrong taxiway/runway these days. Don't these airliners have moving map displays down to the taxiway level? Paint on tarmac seems rather archaic...

G

Rainboe
27th Oct 2008, 12:56
Still years away! B757 and 767 mostly don't even have GPS updating of position! They do have DME DME updating, but there are wide swathes of the world where that does not work (Russia, Oceans). But no, there are no taxiway GPS displays (yet) in service. Lines on taxiways is all you have. You cannot see them when wet or covered with water at night.

Witraz
27th Oct 2008, 12:56
Not yet 'Groundbum' but many if us wish they did, especially when at unfamiliar airports and weather like reported above.

mr ripley
27th Oct 2008, 13:00
Not one of the better airfields.

A very bouncy runway that feels like a bucking bronco at heavy weight take off speeds.

A taxi pattern that involves lots of 90 degree and greater turns. The exit from the main apron that goes through an old stand.

The extension to the secondary that has a tempting new taxiway that is a dead end and most definitely does not connect with the main runway.

Still like flying to Kolkata though.

LHR27C
27th Oct 2008, 13:49
Rainbow/Witraz

Still years away! B757 and 767 mostly don't even have GPS updating of position! They do have DME DME updating, but there are wide swathes of the world where that does not work (Russia, Oceans). But no, there are no taxiway GPS displays (yet) in service

Not yet 'Groundbum' but many if us wish they did, especially when at unfamiliar airports and weather like reported above.

The A380, and many bizjets, have moving map taxiway guidance, as will the 787, and I believe some EFBs on the 777 support it.