kuwait340
12th Nov 2007, 13:07
Hello...
few things i would like to know here ...
it says...in case of NORM BRK FAULT, multiply the landing distance by :
2.35 on dry runway
1.85 on wet runway
1.90 on contaminated runway
then it says...in case of G SYS LO PR, multiply the landing disatnce by :
2.50 on dry runway
2.25 on wet runway
2.75 on contaminated runway.
the first question is: in the first case...why the factor of the wet runway is higher than the dry runway ? and why the dry runway factor is the highest off all in the first case ?
the second question: in the second case : why the contminated factor is the highest off all ...unlike the first case ?
Thanks
few things i would like to know here ...
it says...in case of NORM BRK FAULT, multiply the landing distance by :
2.35 on dry runway
1.85 on wet runway
1.90 on contaminated runway
then it says...in case of G SYS LO PR, multiply the landing disatnce by :
2.50 on dry runway
2.25 on wet runway
2.75 on contaminated runway.
the first question is: in the first case...why the factor of the wet runway is higher than the dry runway ? and why the dry runway factor is the highest off all in the first case ?
the second question: in the second case : why the contminated factor is the highest off all ...unlike the first case ?
Thanks