prm1
5th Oct 2007, 22:43
Question for QUALIFIED people to perhaps give me a ruling on.
The other day I was in a flight a a light jet on a 135 trip, we were on descent from FL350 and our last instructions were as follows
"123ab" Decend at pilot descretion to 10 000 clear to the the airport VOR for the Sector A vor, circle to land approach. We repeated the clearance and proceeded to the aid as instructed. At all times it was a CAVOK day and we could easily see the field 30 miles out. At approx 4 miles from the field the FO broke away from the approach and began to manuvoure to land. NO COMMS could be estabilshed at this stage with centre.
I argued with the PF that our last clearance was to conduct the VOR circle approach and thats what we were going to do until which time we could establish coms again. He disagreed and and claimed we were visual, it was an uncontrolled airport and we could do what we wished.
Who's right, who's wrong here!And more importantly whats the legal requirement :ugh:
Regards
The other day I was in a flight a a light jet on a 135 trip, we were on descent from FL350 and our last instructions were as follows
"123ab" Decend at pilot descretion to 10 000 clear to the the airport VOR for the Sector A vor, circle to land approach. We repeated the clearance and proceeded to the aid as instructed. At all times it was a CAVOK day and we could easily see the field 30 miles out. At approx 4 miles from the field the FO broke away from the approach and began to manuvoure to land. NO COMMS could be estabilshed at this stage with centre.
I argued with the PF that our last clearance was to conduct the VOR circle approach and thats what we were going to do until which time we could establish coms again. He disagreed and and claimed we were visual, it was an uncontrolled airport and we could do what we wished.
Who's right, who's wrong here!And more importantly whats the legal requirement :ugh:
Regards