Mooncrest
11th Jul 2007, 17:47
Many folk on pprune will know that the GMC function at LBA is handled by the Tower controller. It's becoming clearer that the Tower controller frequently has an awful lot on his/her plate these days, particularly the early morning departure rush Monday to Friday and Thursday lunchtime when there seem to be several inbound and outbound airliners all wanting to use the facilities in about a fifteen minute period. I've noticed, with the greatest respect to the ATC community, some instances of "tongue-tying" and mild fluster and every man and his dog trying to get a word in.
My question is, does there come a point when local ATC management or even SRG takes a hand and says "Right boys and girls, we now need to open a GMC position in order to take the pressure off the Tower controller".
I've heard it said that one reason LBA does not yet have a GMC is the lack of a parallel taxiway. With all aircraft having to use at least a portion of the runway for taxiing and the Tower controller obviously being in charge of the runway, responsibility for aircraft taxiing on the runway rests with the Tower controller. Hope that doesn't sound too banal. I would have thought even at the moment, there is sufficient surface traffic to justify a GMC position, taking into account the limited holding points and taxiways. It could even be a "published hours" position, say 0600-2130. I believe Edinburgh once had something similar, with the ATIS advising when GMC was non-op. I gather Bristol and Newcastle (not dissimilar airfields to LBA) now use a GMC.
It's fortunate that LBA uses SIDs, otherwise passing route clearances would occupy even more precious R/T time.
My question is, does there come a point when local ATC management or even SRG takes a hand and says "Right boys and girls, we now need to open a GMC position in order to take the pressure off the Tower controller".
I've heard it said that one reason LBA does not yet have a GMC is the lack of a parallel taxiway. With all aircraft having to use at least a portion of the runway for taxiing and the Tower controller obviously being in charge of the runway, responsibility for aircraft taxiing on the runway rests with the Tower controller. Hope that doesn't sound too banal. I would have thought even at the moment, there is sufficient surface traffic to justify a GMC position, taking into account the limited holding points and taxiways. It could even be a "published hours" position, say 0600-2130. I believe Edinburgh once had something similar, with the ATIS advising when GMC was non-op. I gather Bristol and Newcastle (not dissimilar airfields to LBA) now use a GMC.
It's fortunate that LBA uses SIDs, otherwise passing route clearances would occupy even more precious R/T time.