NetJetEurope total aircraft and orders

[flareflyer]

Maybe it has been already said.........

How many aircraft does NJE have and how many orders for the coming years?

Thanks

Flare

[FLEXJET]

Orders : 32 Hawker 4000s + 24 7X + what I don't know/remember

Active fleet:
F900 CSDFB
F2TH CSDFC
F2TH CSDFD
F2TH CSDFE
F2TH CSDFF
F2TH CSDFG
F900 CSDFH
F2TH CSDFK
F900 CSDFL
C56X CSDFM
C56X CSDFN
C56X CSDFO
C56X CSDFP
C56X CSDFQ
C56X CSDFR
C56X CSDFS
C56X CSDFT
C56X CSDFU
C56X CSDFV
H25B CSDFW
H25B CSDFX
H25B CSDFY
H25B CSDFZ
C550 CSDHA
C550 CSDHB
C550 CSDHC
C550 CSDHD
C550 CSDHE
C550 CSDHF
C550 CSDHG
C550 CSDHH
C550 CSDHI
C550 CSDHJ
C550 CSDHK
C550 CSDHL
C550 CSDHM
C550 CSDHN
C550 CSDHO
C550 CSDHP
C550 CSDHQ
C550 CSDHR
GLF4 CSDKA
GLF5 CSDKB
GLF5 CSDKC
GLF5 CSDKD
GLF5 CSDKE
GLF5 CSDKF
F900 CSDLA
F2TH CSDLB
F2TH CSDLC
BE40 CSDMA
BE40 CSDMB
BE40 CSDMC
BE40 CSDMD
BE40 CSDME
BE40 CSDMF
BE40 CSDMG
BE40 CSDMH
BE40 CSDMI
BE40 CSDMJ
BE40 CSDMK
BE40 CSDML
BE40 CSDMM
BE40 CSDMN
BE40 CSDMO
BE40 CSDMP
H25B CSDNJ
H25B CSDNK
H25B CSDNL
H25B CSDNM
H25B CSDNO
F2TH CSDNP
F2TH CSDNQ
F2TH CSDNR
F2TH CSDNS
H25B CSDNT
H25B CSDNU
H25B CSDNV
C56X CSDNW
H25B CSDNX
C56X CSDNY
C56X CSDNZ
H25B CSDRA
H25B CSDRB
H25B CSDRC
H25B CSDRD
H25B CSDRE
H25B CSDRF
H25B CSDRG
H25B CSDRH
H25B CSDRI
H25B CSDRJ
H25B CSDRK
H25B CSDRL
H25B CSDRM
H25B CSDRN
H25B CSDRO
H25B CSDRP
H25B CSDRQ
H25B CSDRR
H25B CSDRS
H25B CSDRT
H25B CSDRU
H25B CSDRV
H25B CSDRW
C56X CSDXA
C56X CSDXB
C56X CSDXC
C56X CSDXD
C56X CSDXE
C56X CSDXF
C56X CSDXG
C56X CSDXH
C56X CSDXI
C56X CSDXJ
C56X CSDXK
C56X CSDXL
C56X CSDXM
C56X CSDXN

[EatMyShorts!]

Don't forget the 30 Hawker 750 that have been ordered. They will be delivered from 2008 on.

[OLNEY 1 BRAVO]

H25B CS-DRX is also in service.

[eglk01]

And

CSDLD DA2000EX.
CSDXO C560XLS.

Anybody know regs of 7XS On order yet?

cheers.

[theWings]

...and is there any truth in the rumour about 'dumping' all the Bravos, whatever that might mean?! I can see that pax much prefer an aircraft they can at least pretend to stand up in, but can NJE really be planning to reduce capacity that much?

[eglk01]

Apently once Horizons start arriving BE400S Will return to U.S. For onward
resale!!.

[PPRuNeUser0215]

...and is there any truth in the rumour about 'dumping' all the Bravos, whatever that might mean?! I can see that pax much prefer an aircraft they can at least pretend to stand up in, but can NJE really be planning to reduce capacity that much?
I don't know if it is true or not but bear in mind that "passengers" are not chartering these Bravos... They own them so they actually fly in what they can afford to purchase. NJE does not put these PAX against their will on a Bravo as it is an entry level jet to ownership, just like the 400 is, by its size but more importantly by its price tag. PAX do not see the Bravo as a "oh no! Not a Bravo again!". They bought it and they know why too.


As for sending back the 400 to the States when the 4000 arrives. Well maybe such is the timining but two things here. A 4000 is a lot more expensive than a 400 so it won't replace them (if it is what you suggested).
Also according to rumour number one, if NJE was to get rid of Bravos and 400s, NJE will have nothing to cater for a customer who doesn't need to spend 11 Million USD on a plane. They would also have to say goodbye to existing Bravo/400 customers etc... I doubt they will.

[Flintstone]

if NJE was to get rid of Bravos and 400s

Out of curiosity how reliable are the 400's these days? Seven fuel tanks and a wiring loom made in Mexico. Glad I never had that lot to contend with.

[PPRuNeUser0215]

Out of curiosity how reliable are the 400's these days? Seven fuel tanks and a wiring loom made in Mexico. Glad I never had that lot to contend with.
:D :D :D So am I. Only people with a strong faith need to fly ;).

[bizantin]

How reliable? Down to the point I would not fly my own family onboard!!! The maintenance is absolutely useless and the aircraft is crap. The sooner they get rid of that sh...the better it is!

[Capt Crash]

Maintenance is very good through Augsberg, reliability was as good as the Hawker 800. I would fly my family on them, no worries.

The biggest problem on the 400 is the fuel system from A to Z. I didn't have too many problems with the electrical system. It is an ENTRY LEVEL BUSINESS JET and is basic and pretty cheap. I would rather fly a 400 over a Citation any day and most of the passengers are so much happier to be 'on the Beach'.

[Fried_Chicken]

I would presume that if Netjets Europe were to dispose of any aircraft, it would be the 3 Falcon 900's & the single 900EX

Do NJE operate or plan to operate any Cessna 750's? I know the US arm of the company operate the type

FC

[bizantin]

Cpt crashs (interesting name by the way to provide input on safety!). Netjets maintenance is bad because they do not leave time to the maintenance base to correctly fix the problems. As a matter of fact, all entries in the techlogs are written in Augsberg (but try Augsburg, works better) where we cannot fly neither in nor out according to Jar!!! or in Chester (may be 1 flight for the whole company in the last 10years apart from maintenance)
Fly your inlaws if you like...I am sure they will appreciate.
however you are right Augsburg maintenance is very good.

Biz

[Smeagel]

all entries in the techlogs are written in Augsberg You'd think someone would catch on to this one. Amazing how many snags appear as the aircraft arrives at the maintenance base:rolleyes:

where we cannot fly neither in nor out according to JarSo why do people do it? C'mon guys:hmm:

[hawkerpilot]

your right smeagel, but unfortunately a common thing in General aviation and STANDARD in Netjets.
If the Flight inspectors of several DCA,s would look into the techlogs of Netjets, they will find out that STRANGELY ENOUGH, all techlog items filled in either coincides with the day, the aircraft goes into maintenance and STRANGELY CONVIENENT ENOUGH, it coincides with the 6st =last day of the crew s tour.

Those crew must be very unlucky to have all these things break down on their last day of tour, but luckily enough there was a maintenance close by, allready, strangely enough pre booked a few days before....

Not to forget that the guy orchestrating all this is called a fleetmanager, but crew do not argue because when you mess with them, no promotion, or tea and biscuits.

someone mentioned not flying on a 400, few disagree with that, hearing it from the crews, but better not fly Netjets, due to lack of safety minded people and a non existent safety culture.....:}

[Smeagel]

Not to forget that the guy orchestrating all this is called a fleetmanager, but crew do not argue because when you mess with them, no promotion, or tea and biscuits.

Sad but true though I would say that not ALL fleet managers in NJE are like that. I dread to think though how much pressure (from above) the few good ones come under.

As for the 'roll over' ones:rolleyes:

[Capt Crash]

I never had problems going into Augsburg in the dry (difficult in the wet). And I never cheated nor was I asked to do something illegal. Maybe they knew I would tell them to shove it if they did!

I never carried snags except on a MEL. My licence was too hard to come by to loose doing something illegal for Netjets. They would never support you if there was a ramp check and you got busted; they would wash their and let you hang.

[bizantin]

Of course, Augsburg is GA only! You capt Crash are very lucky. Never had a bulb, not MELable never have intermittent thing not working nor landing gear pb nor hydraulic nor.... You must be the only one then!
lucky man, wait a little more, it will come.

Fly safe and good luck!
biz