RobertS975
25th Nov 2006, 14:19
The long planned new runway 14-32 at KBOS is now open. Since there is a multi-story Hyatt hotel at the runway 14 end, the runway will be for landings on 32 and takeoffs on 14. The runway is 5,000 x 100 feet. Now here's my question for air carrier pilots: If you were in a 737NG or a CRJ/ERJ, would you accept a clearance to use 14 for takeoff when there is a 10,000 foot runway 15R also on the field? What I am trying to learn is whether air carrier pilots would tend to demand the inherent extra safety available in using the longer runway?
Same for landing on 32, even with a stiff NW wind... wouldn't one do all they could to get cleared to the 10,000 foot runway rather than accept a clearance to the new runway 32 (visual approach only) at only 5000 ft?
Maybe I am wrong, but most of the air crews I have flown with will back taxi to use an extra three hundred feet... I have a hard time visualizing these same crews accepting the use of a marginal length runway. Maybe just the turboprops will get assigned to the new runway.
Would enjoy hearing the opinions of you air carrier pilots on this?
http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0612/00058AD.PDF
Same for landing on 32, even with a stiff NW wind... wouldn't one do all they could to get cleared to the 10,000 foot runway rather than accept a clearance to the new runway 32 (visual approach only) at only 5000 ft?
Maybe I am wrong, but most of the air crews I have flown with will back taxi to use an extra three hundred feet... I have a hard time visualizing these same crews accepting the use of a marginal length runway. Maybe just the turboprops will get assigned to the new runway.
Would enjoy hearing the opinions of you air carrier pilots on this?
http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0612/00058AD.PDF