PDA

View Full Version : Valid I/R for ......


POT NOODLE HORN
22nd Jun 2006, 18:54
Just a quick question...

Tried the search but with no joy..

Do you required / need to have a current I/R (se or mep) to commence a type rating ?:confused: ?? HELP !!!!

Thanx

HORN

Chesty Morgan
22nd Jun 2006, 19:02
Nope not as far as I know.

You do a type specific IR when you do your conversion course.


:ok:

Mercenary Pilot
22nd Jun 2006, 21:25
Awwww Dude!!!

Didnt you belive me!!! :p :{

From Lasors 2006


Pre-requisite conditions for training

An applicant for the first type rating for a MPA shall
provide evidence that the following requirements have
been met:-

a) have completed at least 100 hours as
pilot-in-command of aeroplanes;

b) hold a current and valid multi-engine Instrument
Rating (Aeroplanes). This is only a requirement for
an initial MPA type rating and not subsequent type
ratings;

c) hold a certificate of satisfactory completion of a
multi-crew co-operation (MCC) course (this
requirement is not applicable to those who have
attended a TRTO course which includes MCC).

d) have passed the professional flight crew

examinations at ATPL level and
performance examination at ATPL level. Credit for
experience on multi-pilot aeroplanes not included
in the above list i.e. types that are no longer in UK
military service, or types flown whilst on exchange
duties with a foreign air arm, will be considered on
a case-by-case basis.

d) Licence holders who have previously passed
national examinations in
Performance Group A
will be deemed to have satisfied the appropriate
aeroplane performance knowledge for the addition
of any aeroplane type or class rating.

e) Licence holders not meeting the criteria at (c) and
who are required to demonstrate knowledge of
aeroplane performance for an additional type
rating, are required to sit the JAR-FCL aeroplane
performance paper at the level appropriate to the
aeroplane type or class to be added to the licence.

That means you need a current IR for your TR like I told you.....your such a :mad: !!!:}

Chesty Morgan
22nd Jun 2006, 21:28
I stand corrected! It was a long time a go!!:\

Mercenary Pilot
23rd Jun 2006, 07:34
The abuse is aimed at PNH 'cause he deserves it:ok: (Its just friendly banter). No offence ment Chesty.:)