I hate cats
20th Mar 2006, 15:05
http://acpilot.********.com/2006/03/what-is-jean-marc-belanger-talking.html
Chris Sorensen of the Financial Post wrote an interesting article titled "Disgruntled pilots could disrupt Air Canada - Upset over CIRB ruling"
It’s not surprising that the article has that 'Original Air Canada' smell given that Chris Sorenson interviewed Jean-Marc Belanger, an ACPA spokesman to gather information about the never-ending Air Canada pilot merger saga.
Anyone who knows anything about ACPA knows Jean-Marc wasn't hired yesterday to speak on ACPA's behalf. If there is a 'clique' of pilots who have influence in the direction ACPA moves then Jean-Marc must certainly be a member. Notably, Jean-Marc was the MEC Chairman who led the union to the first pilot strike experienced at Air Canada in September 1998. Currently his role is changing from that of the Montreal LEC Chairman to the ACPA Spokesman if the Post article is correct. And most importantly perhaps, Jean-Marc was originally hired by Air Canada as opposed to Canadian Airlines. Given these facts, is it really all that surprising that the message Jean-Marc delivers is an 'Original Air Canada Pilot' message?
If I read the article correctly Air Canada is in for some kind of industrial action from its pilots if the seniority dispute isn't resolved to the satisfaction of the [OAC] pilots...
Okay...
What the article fails to mention is that this dispute has simmered for a number of years now in which the OAC pilots have lost every court case and CIRB ruling since July of 2002 when the Mitchnick Award was quashed. What is different now? I'm not sure, although I believe ACPA-OAC merger committee must surely be running out of legal options. Is Jean-Marc's message 'we can't control our union members' or something more threatening?
The article says "the Board [CIRB] said it would not consider mediator Martin Teplitsky's recommendation that elements of the list be reworked to remove advantages, awarded by a previous arbitrator, to about 1,200 former Canadian pilots over about 2,200 "Original Air Canada" (OAC) pilots."
Again, the article fails to mention that the alleged mediation involved only 1 [ACPA-OAC] of the 2 parties, and ALPA who represent the former Canadian Pilots made the legal choice not to participate.
Here is what the CIRB recently said about the Teplitsky mediation:
When reviewing the Teplitsky Report, one must keep in mind that the initiative was essentially one-party mediation. ACPA and ALPA had been the main parties to the ongoing seniority integration conflict. However, ALPA was not present at the mediation table. Its reasons for declining to participate in the exercise do not appear to be unreasonable. Without ALPA at the table, Mr.Teplitsky did not have the benefit of receiving submissions from the party that had represented the former Canadian pilots for the past five years in proceedings relating to seniority integration. [para 102 - Air Canada (2006), as yet unreported CIRB decision no. 349]
The CIRB decision appears to have been a surprise to Jean-Marc, and he continues to say "Others are asking tough questions about how a labour board could ignore [recommendations] by the most respected arbitrator [Teplitsky] in the country"
Jean-Marc makes no mention of the previous respected arbitrator, Brian Keller. Does Jean-Marc like the respected arbitrator Teplitsky better because his seniority improves at the expense of former Canadian pilots on Teplitsky's list? You decide...
At some point the bickering will end. At some point the leaders within ACPA like Jean-Marc must display the courage to say 'the merger fight is over, and its time to move on'. Whether or not ACPA has reached that point is an open question which we will see answered when the ACPA executive meets in the next few days to decide on a response to the recent CIRB decision 349.
Chris Sorensen of the Financial Post wrote an interesting article titled "Disgruntled pilots could disrupt Air Canada - Upset over CIRB ruling"
It’s not surprising that the article has that 'Original Air Canada' smell given that Chris Sorenson interviewed Jean-Marc Belanger, an ACPA spokesman to gather information about the never-ending Air Canada pilot merger saga.
Anyone who knows anything about ACPA knows Jean-Marc wasn't hired yesterday to speak on ACPA's behalf. If there is a 'clique' of pilots who have influence in the direction ACPA moves then Jean-Marc must certainly be a member. Notably, Jean-Marc was the MEC Chairman who led the union to the first pilot strike experienced at Air Canada in September 1998. Currently his role is changing from that of the Montreal LEC Chairman to the ACPA Spokesman if the Post article is correct. And most importantly perhaps, Jean-Marc was originally hired by Air Canada as opposed to Canadian Airlines. Given these facts, is it really all that surprising that the message Jean-Marc delivers is an 'Original Air Canada Pilot' message?
If I read the article correctly Air Canada is in for some kind of industrial action from its pilots if the seniority dispute isn't resolved to the satisfaction of the [OAC] pilots...
Okay...
What the article fails to mention is that this dispute has simmered for a number of years now in which the OAC pilots have lost every court case and CIRB ruling since July of 2002 when the Mitchnick Award was quashed. What is different now? I'm not sure, although I believe ACPA-OAC merger committee must surely be running out of legal options. Is Jean-Marc's message 'we can't control our union members' or something more threatening?
The article says "the Board [CIRB] said it would not consider mediator Martin Teplitsky's recommendation that elements of the list be reworked to remove advantages, awarded by a previous arbitrator, to about 1,200 former Canadian pilots over about 2,200 "Original Air Canada" (OAC) pilots."
Again, the article fails to mention that the alleged mediation involved only 1 [ACPA-OAC] of the 2 parties, and ALPA who represent the former Canadian Pilots made the legal choice not to participate.
Here is what the CIRB recently said about the Teplitsky mediation:
When reviewing the Teplitsky Report, one must keep in mind that the initiative was essentially one-party mediation. ACPA and ALPA had been the main parties to the ongoing seniority integration conflict. However, ALPA was not present at the mediation table. Its reasons for declining to participate in the exercise do not appear to be unreasonable. Without ALPA at the table, Mr.Teplitsky did not have the benefit of receiving submissions from the party that had represented the former Canadian pilots for the past five years in proceedings relating to seniority integration. [para 102 - Air Canada (2006), as yet unreported CIRB decision no. 349]
The CIRB decision appears to have been a surprise to Jean-Marc, and he continues to say "Others are asking tough questions about how a labour board could ignore [recommendations] by the most respected arbitrator [Teplitsky] in the country"
Jean-Marc makes no mention of the previous respected arbitrator, Brian Keller. Does Jean-Marc like the respected arbitrator Teplitsky better because his seniority improves at the expense of former Canadian pilots on Teplitsky's list? You decide...
At some point the bickering will end. At some point the leaders within ACPA like Jean-Marc must display the courage to say 'the merger fight is over, and its time to move on'. Whether or not ACPA has reached that point is an open question which we will see answered when the ACPA executive meets in the next few days to decide on a response to the recent CIRB decision 349.