Centaurus
28th Jan 2006, 12:12
My understanding is the Gasper Fan on the B737-200 was designed for use on the ground with one pack operation in hot weather. In other words to increase the already low airflow and make it slightly colder. Despite this I notice that some operators leave the gasper fan on until 10,000 ft in climb and switch it on at 10,000 ft in the descent. There is ample airflow coming through both packs when the aircraft is airborne and there is nothing to be gained by switching on the Gasper fan. Request thoughts on the matter because I think switching it on while airborne is a waste of time.
With the last and I believe final amendment by Boeing to the 737-200 FCTM, there is no mention of double engine failure approach and landing technique - yet one operator has published a full page in the QRH on flap settings, glide path angles etc required for a dead stick landing. One wonders if this QRH non-normal is Boeing authorised - or is it simply a company derived page published without measured data but as someone's personal view on how it should be done? Similar critical information on dead stick landings does not appear in either the Classics or NG latest QRH from Boeing.
With the last and I believe final amendment by Boeing to the 737-200 FCTM, there is no mention of double engine failure approach and landing technique - yet one operator has published a full page in the QRH on flap settings, glide path angles etc required for a dead stick landing. One wonders if this QRH non-normal is Boeing authorised - or is it simply a company derived page published without measured data but as someone's personal view on how it should be done? Similar critical information on dead stick landings does not appear in either the Classics or NG latest QRH from Boeing.