Pilot Mag Oct (Merged)

[Jetscream 32]

Is it me or has the mag suddenly dropped off a cliff in respect of content and coverage - suddenly Dave Calderwood is gone? and the whole mag is a rambling mess of GA bits and pieces?

Having just read this months it seems like Nick Blooms flying circus - special edition mk 1? - i have nothing against the guy at all but it seems every thing he writes for the mag must have reference to him in it somewhere.........!

And as for Bob Davy's flight test of the Husky Pup - very dissapointed - feel sorry for Bob Pula - gushing on about a Citabria is someone who clearly has limited experience in barnstorming / taildraggers etc. - IMHO

Like for like i would have expected Husky versus Super Cub (150)

Guess its time to move onto a another mag for while

Ho hum :\

[aerobatic_dude]

So i'm not the only one who thinks Pilot has gone downhill recently. I used to buy it every month up until August. Now i've stopped buying pilot and have gone onto buying Flyer and Todays Pilot.

[Flash0710]

Well Jet,

Instead of moaning why not give something positive. Suggest what YOU would do to make it better.....

Anyone can bitch.

Don't even need a licence.......


F.

[muffin]

At least there was a reasonable amount of helicopter content for once instead of all the boring travelogues.

[BRL]

In their own ways, they are all as good as each other really. So Pilot may have gone downhill,(your opinion) of course this kind of thing will, and does happen in this kind of media, not only Pilot but the others mags too suffer a dip now and again don't they?.

As said before, give them feedback, it is easy to email them now or write and suggest something you want to see covered. Better still, write something of your own and send it in and see what happens.

For everyone who thinks the mag has gone downhill there will be someone in favour of it too.

[Monocock]

Funny that...

I bought October's Pilot and thought it was better than it has been of late.

Just goes to show that we all have different expectations.

I was thinking the other day, there are loads of car and bike magazines who have naked women draped all over the cars/bikes......is there some potential here?

I'm not suggesting Flyer goes out and pays some bird with bingo wings £75 to drape herself over a Thruster, more along the subtle lines of Amanda Holden perched nimbly on the wing of a Mooney would do.

(Choise of aircraft names not intended to have double entendres)

[Fuji Abound]

I think all the UK mag. editors should take a look at Flying from the US. I buy it whenever I can, although it is sadly less often available these days. The annual subscription I have just been given should solve that.

The aircraft reviews in the UK mags are on the whole not too bad. The news bites are also OK. IMHO the rest has no depth to it all and seems to be directed at the very new PPL or trainee PPL.

Also the mags are all very pretty and maybe that is what it takes to sell them in the UK but I cant help feeling most pilots would actually prefer better content and less pretty pictures.

Take a look at Flying as a real contrast. I would be interested in other peoples views who are familiar with both types of magazines.

[DubTrub]

helicopter content There's a Rotorheads Forum (http://www.pprune.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=30&forumid=23) for that kind of comment! :}

Just kidding! Actually I find that all the magazines have limited interest to me, because I have a narrow interest myself, and they all try to cater for a very broad audience in a limited UK market...

I must confesss, however, that I would not like to make the Big Business decisions that the editors must make.

[DubTrub]

drape herself Not unprecedented, you know:

http://www.dubtrub.freeuk.com/ad13.jpg
(1941 Advert).

Apologies for the thread drift. Perhaps an Editor would like to do an article reproducing post-war aircraft ads?

[niknak]

Flash, et al'.

It's not up to us to keep up the standards, that's the responsibility of the publishers.

I stopped subscribing to Pilot some time ago because of it's deterioating content, I even wrote in to say why I was doing so and suggested some things which could be improved, I heard nothing back.

The secret of Pilot magazine's success in earlier times was that the edititorial and regular contributing team had experience and contacts not only at G/A level, but right across the spectrum of the industry. They produced an interesting an well balanced, informative magazine which meant something to everyone at all levels who have any interest in aviation.

Sadly, that is certainly not the case now and I really do wonder how much longer they will keep going if they continue to produce such a banal rag.

[IO540]

I'd suggest it is next to impossible to product a "good" magazine for the UK GA market.

For a start, I am certain (though I can't prove it) that a lot of the readership doesn't and never has flown anything. But they buy the mag so their interests need to be covered.

Next, the great majority of new PPLs stop flying within a year or two, so post-PPL readership is going to be relatively transient.

One could address a magazine at vintage aircraft owners (and admirers); that should work.

One could address a magazine at high-time pilot owners who fly distances, and fill it with stuff on IFR, advanced avionics, etc. This works in the USA but here the readership would be far too small.

So all the mags are hanging in there trying to do everything, and in the process please very few.

The things I really don't understand is the aircraft maintenance articles. Very very few readers will be doing their own maintenance anyway, and those that do ought to be able to read the manufacturer's maintenance manuals! Not some generalised tips in a magazine.

Personally, I get 10 minutes' reading for £3.50 - poor value.

[muffin]

In the days of James Gilbert the balance was just about right. The editorial style naturally changed with his departure and the mag has gone downhill from there. I have subscribed to it for about 30 years now and used to read it avidly from cover to cover, but now like the other commentator I find that everything of interest takes about 10 minutes. What is the competition though? Popular Flying has now gone monthly but is solely aimed at the homebuilder. Todays Pilot has more ads for cameras than articles about aviation, and Flyer has good and bad months.

I guess the content balance is never going to be right for everybody.

[KZ8]

In James Gilbert's ownership, the magazine attracted some really excellent contributors over the years, like Brian Lecomber, Bernard Chabbert, Stephen Wilkinson, Doug Bianchi, Neil Williams, Manx Kelly, etc.

With people like that writing for the magazine, it was always a very good read.

For depth of knowledge and experience, James Gilbert and Mike Jerram will always be hard to beat.

KZ8

[Whirlybird]

As some of you know, I write for one of the mags fairly regularly, and others occasionally (and those of you who know who I am, please don't mention my name on here, or this post will get deleted, either by me or BRL ;) ) Deciding who the audience is, and what level to pitch articles at, is difficult. What do you all suggest I should do? I'm serious; I try to get it right, and all suggestions are very welcome.

[Shaggy Sheep Driver]

Agree with KZ8, but I also wonder if it's a case of 'times have changed'. I loved 'Pilot' in the Gilbert days, and subscribed from when I started flying in 1978 right up until the August 2005 issue. Contributed a few articles myself, as well.

However, James is one of aviation's characters and his personality shone through the magazine. He was not always PC which may not go down quite so well in this decade as it did in the last 2 of the 20th century, and my impression of many of the newer PPLs is that they may not be looking for the stuff that turned us older guys on back then. Bottom line is that flying is perhaps a tad less free and fun than it was back then, and this is reflected in the current readership and the mags they demand.

As for the US 'Flying', I don't read it often but that's because my impression is it caters for the 'turbcharged IFR' sector, which is big in the US. Many UK pilots (like me) are VFR fun flyers and the pilot base is tiny compared to US. The UK mags have therefore to ry to satisfy a wide range of tastes in one publictaion.

SSD

[Jetscream 32]

In reply to Flash - yes i have written to NB - to which i had an arrogant reply.

If there was enough interest - i think i would publish my own mag - but it would be a pdf mag delivered by email - that way you could print it on toilet paper and use it environmentally after you had read it? :E :E

[Fuji Abound]

"but it would be a pdf mag delivered by email"


Funny you should say that, I have always thought that would be a very good idea for a GA mag.

PPL IR do exactly this and it is a very good read, albeit catering for a very specialist sector of the GA community. I think GA in general needs someting similiar.

"US 'Flying', I don't read it often but that's because my impression is it caters for the 'turbcharged IFR' sector"

As you say, you obviously dont read it very often.:D

[Shaggy Sheep Driver]

As you say, you obviously dont read it very often.

Has it changed significantly in the last few years, then? If so, I might look out for a copy. ;)

SSD

[Monocock]

An interesting topic.

Let's face it, finding enough new and interesting things to write about GA and the hardware involved is not an easy task. Just look at the lists of previously tested aircraft in the longer standing publications and see how often they have had to duplicate an aircraft.

There's hardly alot of current affairs in the GA industry that can be covered in the front few pages. Apart from the odd bankruptcy or new personal jet test flight results these seem to read the same month after month.

A good writer can make a flight test in a diesel Cessna sound a lot more exciting than a poor writer giving their views on low level circuits in a Citation. This will always be the case. I question the readability of most of the articles mainly from the point of view of their lack of entertainment. We buy these magazines to enjoy and relax, not to get tied up in the benefits of different spark plugs and how they perform at different altitudes... If I laugh out loud at an article I know it has been good. The recent series by a well known aerobatics pilot has been (and continues to be) excellent.

Where do these writers come from? I have not had the pleasure of reading Whirlybird's work as I turn the pages when I see a helicopter article in the same way that I do when I see PCWorld's adverts in the Sunday papers.

Take Cloud69's writing for example. The guy had an enjoyable flight in his 152 recently and he sat down and wrote about it for 30 minutes and posted it here. The response was incredible and that's not just because it was well written; it was written by a chap who loves to fly for what it is.

Can it be that some of the writers are bored of it after all these years and have lost the passion to put something down on paper that will keep the reader glued?

If I was asked to summarise the main three it would be as follows:

PILOT - The grandad of them all. Aimed more at the "budding ATPL" pilot. Steely and cold, not to be written to with suggestions for fear of the almighty!

FLYER - GA magazine with a "club" feel. Personal touches and friendly staff from what I can gather.

TODAYS PILOT - Has the benefit of being the relative newcomer so seems to get away with printing articles that are very similar to ones that others have done in the past.

I cannot help but admire the way that these chaps think up new and interesting topics to write about. My beef is that they need to find people who can do so in an entertaining way. When did you last photocopy and article from one of these magazines and give it to someone because it was so good?

I am expecting a barrage of criticism for my comments. Please don't hold back, give me both barrels if I have offended you. We may as well be honest!!

:ok:

[ozplane]

I suspect quite a lot of us read all 3 mags in the hope that there will be something of value in one of them. The free landings help to defray the cost and get you out to some different airfields. However I have to agree with an earlier poster that the helicopter stuff should be removed and put in a separate quarterly (?) magazine. However I think the standard for this type of mag is the American AOPA mag which seems to go from grassroots to business jets. But then it has a MUCH bigger readership.

[AfricanEagle]

All magazines have good months and occasionally a few less good months.

I read the two major British mags, a couple of Italian ones and the american Flying every month.

I personally want to read about flying stories and fun in the air and enjoy travel write ups (if it is well written).

The mag that never disappoints me is Flying: there can be good or bad features, but the columnists are always excellent.

The great Gordon Baxter and Len Morgan have been well replaced and every month there is at least one story that transfers the joy and passion of flying.

AE

[Whirlybird]

If I laugh out loud at an article I know it has been good.

So do the editors of the flying mags. One told me recently that comedy would always be welcome. But somehow, when it comes to aviation writing, it's incredibly hard to do. I thought about it...and shelved the idea for the time being...but still thinking about it. I'm not quite sure why it's so hard to be funny, or even light-hearted, when it comes to flying. Do we all take ourselves too seriously, maybe? After all, spending one's leisure time at 2000 ft is a serious business. OTOH, I had a flight into Manchester recently where a lot of little things went wrong, and I had several of my friends in stitches when I told them the story. Why don't I write about it, even on PPRuNe? A number of possibilities - fear of criticism, not being so funny on paper, a pretty short flight so does anyone care...I don't know; I'm thinking out loud here. :confused:

As you say, Monocock, an interesting topic.

[Monocock]

I'm happy to proof read for a constructive opinion if you want?!

[Confabulous]

Obvious perhaps, but...

Why don't we all try our hand at 'articles', either topics dear to our heart, or maybe a new type we've flown recently, or a trip, or something excellent and new like cloud69's recent contribution... and post them here for critiquing?

No-one says we have to submit them to the magazines, just give ourselves what we want, get constructive feedback and maybe give each poster a bit of a different perspective on GA.

Requests, anyone? It'll take me a few days to write something (probably about learning to fly from a student's perspective - hopefully a fresh look!

Confab

[Andy_R]

Go for it Confab. We all have different ideas on what would be a good readable subject, until you try you won't know - nor will we ;)

[Confabulous]

Shifted to the 'Articles thread....

[sunday driver]

How very timely. Looks like the poisoned barbs found a target.

"Pilot has been an influential player the heart of the aviation community for over 40 years and needs a vibrant and clear thinking editor to further develop this major brand in print and online in order to strengthen its number one position."

We've got your names, lads and lasses, so form an orderly queue at the door of . . . Bob Crawley, Publishing Director, Archant Specialist 01799 544200. (sits vac - pilot oct 2005) . . . and let us know how you get on.

SD

[Wide-Body]

Hi Flash

Sorry to dissagree with you old chap, but I do agree mostly with Jetscream.

I did not enjoy the the October issue. I generally like pilot mag, but have not been a fan of the NB articles. The YAk 52 piece was one of the poorest I have ever seen. Our own SSD conveyed much more of the spirt of the aircraft in his review a few years ago. Reading his articles, by his own words, NB constantly displays poor handling skills, I for one will not let him near any aircraft I am responsible for. Based upon his OWN reviews

I disagree with him on the BD reviews. While anyone can have an off day, I think that Bob writes a good review and tells it from the heart. He displayed very able handling skills on the day we flew. I also like the humour and will never forget the Soko Krudj report (although anyone who has tried to sell one since will). Although I do belive a lot of his articles have been edited to remove humour over the last few yeas to avoid upsetting the PC brigade.

To reply constructively to your post Flash. Give all flight tests to BD and the master of them all Maxi Ganzi. As for me I would make an appauling journalist (I can not spell or type), it is a skill I do not posess.

And before the hammers of hell descend, I have told Nick my views and have never hid behind a cloak of anonimity. Myself and the very aviation expierienced Mrs WB were asked to an evening to talk about the new pilot format. She did pass many positive feedback points, but on the negative was given a very dismissive reply by the deputy editor. It was a mark of the man.

Good luck to Pilot, I hope the new editor can master the challenges before him. Like all new media in the country his critics await, only he will need to look on this forum to view the best.

Regards to all

Wide

[Shaggy Sheep Driver]

I did not enjoy the the October issue. I generally like pilot mag, but have not been a fan of the NB articles. The YAk 52 piece was one of the poorest I have ever seen. Our own SSD conveyed much more of the spirt of the aircraft in his review a few years ago. Reading his articles, by his own words, he constantly displays poor handling skills, I for one will not let him near any aircraft I am responsible for. Based upon his OWN reviews

Glad you liked my '52 piece, WB. I hope your subsequent comments about 'poor handling skills' are referring to NB not me? Your post can be read either way (but then, you do admit you are a tad short of journalistsic skills ;) ).

Cheers

SSD

[Wide-Body]

SSD

Most certainly NOT refering to you

Will work on the grammer

Regards

Wide:ok:

[Flash0710]

Hey Wide,

I was there too remember?

Agree with all of your points as raised and whilst BD may speak from the trouser a lot he still makes an informative read.

As for the Yak article the best one to ask about it for feedback with be our Soviet spinning friend. He keeps them all and is very keen to see if they describe the/operate AC in the ( correct ) way.

rgds to you and MWB....

F.

[The Right Stuff]

I regard Pilot as my newspaper and the first thing I read each month is ILAFFT.

There is a fairly limited amount of relavant material, but I found the helicopter article interesting, as it's another side to aviation and flying is what I'm interested in.

I realise some people have very specific interests, and for that very reason, they'll be less tolerant of material that doesn't interest them.

Reminds me of people I know in radio control model circles; I fly r/c model aeroplanes, but also have r/c cars and boats. So I'm into modelling generally, others however bemoan 'them', who aren't into the same things.

A magazine that always impresses me each month is Aeroplane, what was Aeroplane Monthly. All of aviation history to go at, as well as today's happenings, and some of the stories told do make me laugh. The technical stuff and database features are excellent.

[MikeGodsell]

Try the French aviation mags for a comparison.

I love the way they rubbish the politicians / regulations / burocrats etc See the editorial by Bernard Chabbert in June edition of 'Aviasport' : Quote.."In their terrifying and pathetic appetite for regulation they demolish, sabotage, ruin, and destroy all that is of the essence of human endevour"

Also look out for 'Vol Moteur' which covers light aeroplanes and microlights. They have often have the first news of new developments (of which there are many in France) For instance the Dieselis an Opel car diesel engined two seater with 80 MPG on Jet A1 fuel was featured recently.
May edition has a report on the Hirth two stroke engines using electronic fuel injection and blown exhaust. Resulting in no pollution, huge increase in MPG, and proper lubrication of bearings.....goodby Rotax!

'Aviation & Pilote' is the nearest equivalent to our Pilot mag and has a similar broad mix of articles, but no ILAFFT.

MG

[Complex_Type]

In James Gilbert's ownership, the magazine attracted some really excellent contributors over the years, like Brian Lecomber, Bernard Chabbert, Stephen Wilkinson, Doug Bianchi, Neil Williams, Manx Kelly, etc.

I would add Maxi Gainza to that list, really good stuff in his second language but I reckon he is one of the more expensive contributors as he is in less often these days.

I pick up the mags and buy the one with the most intersting stuff in it. Not buying many of late.

[Penguina]

Deciding who the audience is, and what level to pitch articles at, is difficult.

Had a chat about this with my brother-in-law (your archetypal once a month bimble in the local area PPL) a while back.

Our conclusion was that we have a bit of a saturated market problem. My feeling is that were each of the three magazines just to hone their content towards a certain audience and stop hedging their bets quite so much, then the content may be a little less insipid.

Currently, it has to be one-size-fits-all and, as such, simply can't compete for liveliness with these forums or a chat down the club, in which you can be as flippant or serious, as generalised or specialised, as anecdotal or discursive as the mood takes you.

Also, in order to learn something from a magazine, they have to give you information about an area of aviation that you're not likely to have experienced and thus have no personal interest in as such, as you can't relate to it. And let's face it, that always makes reading more interesting.

If Pilot was mainly for young aspirationals, Flyer for average recreationals and vintage-lovers and TP focussed on PPL student pilots (for example) and new PPLs, that might work.

Or maybe if one were erudite, one an easy read and one a little less factual and contained more discussion of the experiences of flying, then each would pick the one with the tone that suits. I'm thinking of daily newspapers, that present the same news but with different delivery and weighting providing for different readerships.

I presume that this honing of content I describe wouldn't lead to sufficient sales, though, or surely it would have happened already?

One told me recently that comedy would always be welcome. But somehow, when it comes to aviation writing, it's incredibly hard to do.

Let's face it. The funniest bits of aviation are the bits we'd be too embarrassed to put in print... :O ;)

[Jumpin Jaques]

Hi all,

A friend of mine highlighted this forum, and indeed this thread to me. I hope you do not mind me joining the forum to express a few comments. Lots of interesting comment in this thread, and it is quite obvious that everyone shares differing views. Yes it is true that Pilot potentially need some work to take it to the next level. The loss of DC may not actually be a bad thing, and NB is acting editor for the time being. There have been many comments about the content of the articles and in the same vain, many of you have mentioned some good ideas. The next few months will see development, and I hope that you will already have seen some of this by way of better quality covers (a small start, but a step in the right direction). At Archant Specialist, we would welcome your views, and I would encourage you to write to the editorial team to tell them your ideas, and even offer to write for them. The word passion has been used in previous posts, and this is exactly what makes a good read. You all appear to be passionate individuals, and that’s encouraging to us.

I would stress that it is always difficult to keep everyone happy all the time, and it is certainly our aim to keep the majority entertained. If you wish to express further opinion in this thread, I will ensure that like the previous entries, it is fed back and taken on board. Please don't take this as an opportunity to shoot me down, but rather as an opportunity to help make a difference.


Thankyou:D

[Final 3 Greens]

same vain

Pilot potentially need some work

pssionate

oppertunity

oppertunity

Jaques - is English your mother tongue?

I do not wish to shoot you down, but if you represent Archant and have difficulty with spelling and grammar, it does not give a very good impression of editorial rigour.

For your information, I am a member of the editorial board of a specialist journal in another field, so I am sympathetic to your cause, but the typos in your post undermine your credibility.

[Final 3 Greens]

WR

Whilst you are quite entitled to your opinion, which you express in a very reasonable way, I think that you may have misunderstood my post.

I believe that Jaques' mother tongue may not be English.

He may not be claiming to be the editor, but does imply that he works for Archant and the tone of his mail is authoritative.

Whilst your point about the difference between an internet post and an article in Pilot is generous and helpful, there will be others reading this thread who take a different view.

Therefore I'm doing him a favour, as someone in a different part of the same industry and gently pointing out that he needs to be more careful with his writing. The odd typo is normal, but 5 in less than 300 words ( and I did not point out the sixth in the sign off) is quite a lot.

And whilst you are perfectly entitled to disagree with my view, it is based on expert knowledge of the type of feedback that my colleagues and I receive about our journal and our forays into related fora.

[Jumpin Jaques]

Fair comment, my spelling is awful (especially at 7am on a Saturday morning!), for which I am sorry! Spelling is now corrected. I am very much English, and part of the Archant Specialist team. The point of my post is to generate ideas for moving the magazine forward.

[stiknruda]

my spelling is awfull (especially at 7am on a Saturday morning!),

Is that why you've even got your own name wrong, Jacques?

Stik

[KZ8]

I would add Maxi Gainza to that list

Totally agree with that.

Like all the other contributors I mentioned, Maxi has the ability to put the reader into the cockpit to 'live' the experience.

I remember a wonderful article he wrote in the late 1970s when he flew his Zlin 526 out to West Germany to fly with Ladi Bezak, a legend in aerobatics who isone of the Czech team members who developed the Lomcevak maneouvres in the 1960s.

A wonderful story, we knew more about the legend and we got a flying lesson as well.

KZ8

[Zulu Alpha]

I agree, the articles in Pilot by Maxi Gainza always interest me. Well written and interesting subjects. Lets hope they get him writing again.

Its difficult to put my finger on why the magazine has become less interesting. They did a big market survey some time ago. Maybe they just aimed at the lowest common denominator.

I think they have taken a step towards the student pilot end of the market and many of the articles seem very basic. I don't buy it every month now, I just scan it at Smiths and buy it if there is something that catches my eye. I used to subscribe.

I had thought it was me but it seems I am not alone. Shame, because I always used to look forward to reading it.

[IO540]

I've just let my subscription to Flyer run out. It's probably the best one in the UK but for me, 10 minutes' reading isn't worth £3.50.

[Zulu Alpha]

I've just received my (free) copy of Loop.
Produced by many ex pilot people... so thats where they all went

Go to www.loop.aero to subscribe for a free copy.

[Kolibear]

I've just received my November issue. Can I suggest that you go down to the newsagent & grab a sneaky peek at the double-spread photo on P4-5.

And then answer this simple question.

How many spark-plugs were in the picture?

[Phil Space]

I stopped buying it when James Gilbert sold up.
It was bound to go downhill when a Norwich newspaper group took over. As Alan Partrige discovered Norfolk is the graveyard of media ambition.

I think they have run out of ideas and the novelty of running a flying mag has worn off. Flyer seems to have signed up all the talent.

[High Wing Drifter]

Today's Pilot seems to have improved of late too.

[niknak]

Like any commercial organisation, the Archant Group (the graveyard of media ambition - yet the most successful/profitable publishing company in the UK), took over Pilot magazine because they recognised the potential for a good return.

They continue to get that return, but equally recognise that unless they maintain standards, (which hasnt happened) they will lose customers (which has happened).

The owner of the group, himself a highly experienced pilot and aircraft owner, has made various changes which he is confident will convince me and others that the magazine is worth buying.

If those changes don't work, the magazine will fold - his words, not mine.

[cubflyer]

Problem is that if Archant hadnt made the changes they did when they took over Pilot, then it would be a much better magazine today, so they wouldnt need to make more changes!
I see that Flyer is improving, now that it has Phil Whiteman as editor, now wasnt he at Pilot once! And hasnt Pilot gone down hill in the last couple of years and become a bit like the Flyer of old!!!
hopefully there will be improvements now!

[IO540]

I think the magazines should carry occassional articles about advanced avionics, instrument flight, and stuff like that.

I know many people would veto that, on the grounds that it is utterly irrelevant to their 1930 fabric covered aircraft, or their C150, but it would be something for pilots to aspire to.

The very successful American mags carry that sort of stuff, yet much of the American GA fleet is as decrepit as the UK stuff. They do have a much bigger IFR pilot group but not enough to support the circulations they have.

I've seen a few such articles appearing but they tend to be dumbed down to the point of being of no use to anyone.

There is a limit to how many articles a mag can carry on carb icing, and all the standard stuff.

[J.A.F.O.]

I’ve been reading Pilot, on and off, for twenty years and I still have some Gilbert vintage ones lying around, so I picked one up and flicked through it and either I’m missing something or I’m a bit thick – I really don’t know what you’re talking about.


OCT 2005

1. Editorial
2. Red Bull Air Race
3. Airfield News
4. Aviat Husky Pup
5. Mountain Flying
6. Headgear Tests
7. Readers Letters
8. News from AOPA
9. African Safari
10. Helicopters – A 2nd Career
11. Cirrus (by someone who owns one)
12. Coastguard Flying
13. Engine Management
14. 6 Old Timers Articles
15. Safety Matters
16. Airfield Pull-Out Guide
17. Six Free Landing Vouchers
18. Calendar of Events
19. Yak 52
20. Wood Repairs
21. 5 Book Reviews
22. 8 Product Reviews
23. 4 DVD Reviews
24. How Air Brained Are You
25. Flight Sim Review
26. Hundreds of Adverts
27. ILAFFT
28. 20 Odd other news items
29. 122 Pages


OCT 2000

1. Opinion
2. WAC 2000
3. No airfield news
4. Lake Renegade
5. Baltic Tour
6. No equipment tests
7. Page after page of readers letters
8. Another page of opinion
9. Australian Safari
10. Helicopters – Buying Time
11. Trinidad (by someone who doesn’t)
12. Police Aviation
13. A Profile of Xavier de Lapparent
14. 19 Old Timers Articles
15. Safety Matters
16. No airfield guide
17. No free landing vouchers
18. Calendar of Events
19. Curtiss Helldiver
20. No articles on self-maintenance
21. 3 Book Reviews
22. No product reviews
23. 5 Video Reviews
24. How Air Brained Are You
25. Flight Sim Review
26. Hundreds of Adverts
27. ILAFFT
28. 30 Odd other news items
29. 122 Pages

So, what's going on? Are people wearing rose-tinted Raybans or is the old Pilot better than the new Pilot in the same way that the 1930s were better than today - what with rickets and high infant mortality and all that? I can only see that Pilot was better under Mr Gilbert if you flew amphibious warbirds - is that such a huge market?

[FullyFlapped]

Having the day off and not much to do, I was pleased to see Flyer mag turn up on the doormat this morning. I don't always get a chance to read the mags thoroughly, so with some pleasure and armed with a large steaming mug of Yorkshire's finest brew, I settled down for a pleasant interlude ...

I'd got as far as "Adventures of Pilot X" or whatever it's called, before I started to wonder if the years of overwork and (legal) chemical abuse were beginning to take their toll on my marbles. I could have sworn I'd read this one before ...

A quick flick through last month's mag revealed the sad truth : same article, word for word !

Perhaps a new column is in order ? "Edit like a professional" ? "Proof read like a professional" ? ;) ;) ;)

FF :ok:

[splatt]

Hmm yes, I notice that the answers on the last page didn't match the article for 'That worst day'.

I've been reading aviation magazines for the last 14 years with a couple of breaks in between. One of the really noticeable differences between the magazines these days and the ones I bought many years back is the amount of small (and large!) mistakes that seem to find their way to final printing!

I'm now in my mid twenties and feel that I am part of a generation that has grown up willing to compromise and accept lower and lower standards. But the decline in standards in general is now starting to get ridiculous! I mean you can't even telephone a person about a utility bill anymore, you have to talk to a machine that can only handle a certain number of situations. Getting back to the case in point: I know its only a £35 annual subscription but the least that could be done is some thorough proof reading for glaringly obvious defects. Have some pride people!

splatt

PS. To be fair, I have copied this message to the flyer forums.

[big.al]

For a relatively small fee (equivalent to perhaps four hours flying costs per month) I'll volunteer my services to proof-read the magazine cover-to-cover. I'm already a subscriber so they'd just have to send my copy a month early...!

[ozplane]

While you're at it, you might want to have a look at the review of the Breitling Chrono Navitimer in November's Pilot mag. The photo bears no relationship to the text......"set into the face are three sub-dials". The picture doesn't have one. Not good.

[IanSeager]

Thanks for all of the kind proof reading offers, alas in this case it was nothing to do with proof reading, more a techinical ***k up.

See here (http://forums.flyer.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=17338) for the gory details.

Ian

[IO540]

Spelling errors are one thing; what really gets to me is when a magazine prints a letter from a reader, containing really clear errors of fact, for example concerning license privileges.

Occassionally one sees this in a feature article. Implicitly this is presented as fact, when in reality it is no more than the writer's personal opinion (and he should have presented both sides of the argument). This is much worse, but even the letter mentioned earlier should not have got printed (well not without a clear correction from the editor).

There is SO much bull, incorrect information, occassionally disinformation (particularly concerning foreign licenses/ratings/registrations where so many people are grinding axes) going around GA that the magazines have a serious responsibility to get things right.

I have on occassions felt like writing in, but it's like these online forums (fora?). If one dived in every time something factually incorrect gets posted, one would spend hours a day online. As indeed some people do..... but those that do tend to contribute the least to knowledge.

[IanSeager]

what really gets to me is when a magazine prints a letter from a reader, containing really clear errors of fact, for example concerning license privileges.

Did you have something specific in mind?

Ian

[AfricanEagle]

errors of fact, for example concerning license privileges.

I can't complain about magazines on the above issue since I can't get some clear facts concerning license privileges from the Italian CAA which is meant to be the beholder of truth :(

AE

[ChampChump]

It was clear, fairly quickly, that the Breitling reviews and Breitling illustrations were switched; hardly unusual in publishing these days but below the standard we've come to expect in that magazine. I used to rate Pilot very highly for its above-average production values; now I'm reserving judgement until a new Editor is named and given time to settle in. But wait - what's this? Mr Bloom IS editor in one of his comments....

Both - or indeed all three - magazines have something to offer, usually beyond the free landing vouchers, but I fear to get the best reading when one's grounded a subscription to each is required, thus ensuring triple doses of the latest machine going the rounds.:zzz:

Subscription renewal time will be interesting around here. I admit to enjoying Flyer at present because I won a year's worth at a CAA Safety Evening.:D :D

[formationfoto]

Sadly havent seen the Nov issue yet (with watch review) but it is always a pain to the writer of an article when photos and copy get cxxxed up in the production process. Given the way these things are done it is not a surprise when something like this happens but is extremely frustrating.

Stik

Dont know who the earlier Archant post was - not me - I fail to get on to PPRUNE from the UK, have had to come to the US to be able to log on (writing this from Sacramento!).

[London Mil]

I must agree with the comment about inaccurate information. There was a letter in the Sep (?) issue complaining about West Drayton and their reluctance to provide info on 'Purple Airspace'. This letter then went on to openly criticise the military at West Drayton for failing to meet one of their tasks. A quick phone call from the editorial staff to West Drayton would have highlighted that the author did not know what he was talking about and the procedures for promulgating 'Purple Airspace' had been amended some 4 years beforehand, these being clearly described the AIP. What is even more ridiculous is that the current OC LATCC(Mil) is a keen GA pilot who will bend over backwards to support the cause!!