PPRuNe Radar
24th Aug 2005, 22:40
RYANAIR CALLS FOR MORE EFFICIENT AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL
GREATER EFFICIENCY, LOWER EMISSIONS, LOWER FARES
Ryanair, Europe’s No. 1 low fares airline today (11th August) called for the implementation of a more efficient European air traffic control system that would reduce fuel burn, emissions, flight times and fares.
Politicians and European Air Navigation Service Providers have been aware of these issues for years but because of state monopolies, archaic work practices and a slow pace of change, European air traffic control remains a patchwork of inefficiency.
Peter Sherrard, Ryanair’s Head of Communications said,
“When the Open Skies policy liberalized air traffic in Europe in 1997, it resulted in massively lower fares for ordinary passengers and opened up many of Europe’s peripheral regions to the benefits of year round tourism.
“Now it is time to repeat this success in European Air Traffic Control by:
· Creating practical airspace blocks rather than National boundries
· Creating competition for the provision of ATC services in each of these blocks
This would put an end to elongated and inefficient “W” shaped flight paths that often add 30% onto the direct routes and generate efficiencies and cost reductions not available from existing state sponsored monopolies. It would also reduce air fares for passengers and decrease the environmental impact of air travel more than any ill conceived aviation taxes ever could.”
Just been forwarded this by another Mod. Thanks flyblue !!
It is not really very original thinking from Mr Sherrard. The principles and strategies have been there for years in the European ATM world. He is however right that politics and practicalities are taking a long time to overcome.
There are a lot of areas where national boundaries are 'superceded' to provide the best service. Perhaps Ryanair don't realise it. As an example, almost without exception, the UK provides ATS in the airspace of its neighbours .. and conversely, its neighbours provide ATS in UK airspace.
Direct routes are also used extensively in Europe, when it is possible to do so. Probably the main blocker to this being H24 is military airspace and activity. Perhaps the fact that Ireland has a small air force (which matches its defence requirements)with little requirement for airspace means that Mr Sherrard is unaware of this ??
I don't think I disagree with his stated aims, however, his naivety is worrying for someone of influence in the industry :ok:
GREATER EFFICIENCY, LOWER EMISSIONS, LOWER FARES
Ryanair, Europe’s No. 1 low fares airline today (11th August) called for the implementation of a more efficient European air traffic control system that would reduce fuel burn, emissions, flight times and fares.
Politicians and European Air Navigation Service Providers have been aware of these issues for years but because of state monopolies, archaic work practices and a slow pace of change, European air traffic control remains a patchwork of inefficiency.
Peter Sherrard, Ryanair’s Head of Communications said,
“When the Open Skies policy liberalized air traffic in Europe in 1997, it resulted in massively lower fares for ordinary passengers and opened up many of Europe’s peripheral regions to the benefits of year round tourism.
“Now it is time to repeat this success in European Air Traffic Control by:
· Creating practical airspace blocks rather than National boundries
· Creating competition for the provision of ATC services in each of these blocks
This would put an end to elongated and inefficient “W” shaped flight paths that often add 30% onto the direct routes and generate efficiencies and cost reductions not available from existing state sponsored monopolies. It would also reduce air fares for passengers and decrease the environmental impact of air travel more than any ill conceived aviation taxes ever could.”
Just been forwarded this by another Mod. Thanks flyblue !!
It is not really very original thinking from Mr Sherrard. The principles and strategies have been there for years in the European ATM world. He is however right that politics and practicalities are taking a long time to overcome.
There are a lot of areas where national boundaries are 'superceded' to provide the best service. Perhaps Ryanair don't realise it. As an example, almost without exception, the UK provides ATS in the airspace of its neighbours .. and conversely, its neighbours provide ATS in UK airspace.
Direct routes are also used extensively in Europe, when it is possible to do so. Probably the main blocker to this being H24 is military airspace and activity. Perhaps the fact that Ireland has a small air force (which matches its defence requirements)with little requirement for airspace means that Mr Sherrard is unaware of this ??
I don't think I disagree with his stated aims, however, his naivety is worrying for someone of influence in the industry :ok: