PDA

View Full Version : 48-hour maximum working week


PIGDOG
11th May 2005, 19:08
So the EU want to get rid of the opt out clause that the UK is so very fond of.

A maximum working week of 48 hours.

Am I right in saying that that is total time spent working, not just flying time?

Irish Steve
11th May 2005, 19:32
A maximum working week of 48 hours.

That has the potential to royally f:mad:k most of the ground handling companies!

Most weeks in the summer, we worked close on 30 hours at the weekend, as well as the rest of the roster in the week. It was always "voluntary", but we all knew exactly which side our bread was buttered if we didn't do it!

If it's properly implemented, maybe at last, there will be some quality staff and conditions in ground handling.

Rollingthunder
11th May 2005, 21:23
We've had that for years here but there is an averaging over time get out clause for overtime. I think it's three months. So the limit works out to not more than 576 hours in 12 weeks.

moggiee
11th May 2005, 21:29
Might this make the operation of some very-long-haul routes a shade tricky?

Heathrow to Buenos Aires and back will cover almost a whole week's allowance.

Pub User
11th May 2005, 21:37
moggiee

How many times do you think people fly LHR to BUE in a week?

Airbus Girl
12th May 2005, 07:36
The EU already approved a 48 hour max working week but the UK (along with er, Malta I think) opted out of the restriction so that, if they wanted to, UK employees could work longer hours. Because many employers coerced their employees to work longer than 48 hours the UK is now considering going back to the main 48 hour week restriction, no overtime allowed. Much of the airline industry is exempt from these restrictions anyway, with pilots able to be rostered 55 hours and work 60 hours in a week. However, the new proposals may also say that time spent "on call" is not included in the 48 hours.

parkfell
12th May 2005, 07:45
This aspect of the WTD will not impact upon those covered by CAP 371. The 48 hours is averaged over 12 weeks.

The CAP allows for up to 2000 hours pa which divided by 48 weeks [52-4 weeks hols] gives an average of 41.67 hours.



:cool:

CargoMatatu
12th May 2005, 08:05
My last two employments (separate employers), which were/are in the airline industry, were initially administered by H.R. Departments situated in the U.K.

On both occasions, when completing the initial employment documentation, I was presented with the opt out document and told that if I wanted to work there then I MUST sign it!:confused: Voluntary:confused: I don't think so:mad:

I for one am glad that someone is trying to stop BLATANT EXPLOITATION:ok:

Rant over!

airmail
12th May 2005, 08:16
parkfell

Unfortunately I don't believe that this is the case. The vote in the European Parliament yesterday does not allow for anymore 'averaging' of hours over a period of time which (I think) was part of the original opt-out clause.

Instead, what is being said (allegedly due to health and safety reasons which is how the vote went through) is that a working week will consist of 48 hours maximum with at least 11 hours rest between shifts. From what I understand, this also includes standby or on-call time as well (within the 48 hours).

It will probably never happen as the Council of Europe is likely to vote it out, but I can see a lot of businesses (not just aviation related ones) being concerned this morning.

airmail

Grabber
12th May 2005, 08:39
The Working Time directive calls for an average of working 48 hours over 17 consecutive weeks. Currently anyone in the EU can opt out voluntarily but this has been applied mostly in the UK and former East European countries such as Poland.

The 2 changes voted for by the MEP's are to remove the 'Opt out' and count time on call out (standby) as working time. However, this is unlikely to be passed into law as it is well known that the EU countries that strictly follow this law are also the ones least attractive for foreign investors and have high unemployment such as France and Germany.

The biggest impact to Flight and Ground Crew I see is the limit of 8 hours night duty per shift. Your friendly Ops and Crewing staff will no longer be able to do their much loved 2 day, 2 night 4 off roster pattern.

moggiee
12th May 2005, 11:08
May I suggest that if you go out to BUE and back it will normally be done in less than 4 days, leaving you with about half a dozen hours to play with for the rest of the week?

gator bait
12th May 2005, 11:22
Grabber

Me thinks that certain night freight companies may fold if crews can only work 8 hours at night.

Pegasus77
12th May 2005, 11:30
Dear mogggiee,

May I suggest to you that after you return from a 4-day-tour to EZE, you are probably not fit to fly the next day, not even speaking of (legal) requirements for rest?

Regards,
P77


edited for EZE

Rainboe
12th May 2005, 12:11
Are you talking about Buenos Aires? That is EZE.

ExSimGuy
12th May 2005, 20:27
NOT talking specifically about aviation - The standard working week in the Middle-East is 48 hours - sometimes 45!

And back in UK a few years ago, I was with a manufacturing company whose staff were cut to "no overtime" ("recession") and many were struggling to pay their mortgage. I was a "company hero" when I designed a bit of kit that got a bit BT order and sudenly it was "no restriction on overtime"!

Compulsory overtime is a different story. I've probably put in some 60 or 70 hours this week (no overtime pay!) at my own choice, to try to get some things off the ground, but I didn't have to

Specifically Aviation - I'd certainly not want to think that the crew of the aircraft that I was in as a pax (sleeping, to catch up on my lost rest!) were tired from excessive hours. If I'm over-tired, the worst thing that can happen is that I run off the road driving back from a customer site (okay, maybe I drive off through on-coming traffic and take out a couple of others - not good) but a tired flight crew is something we don't want to even think about.

When mass-safety is concerned, you should be able to dictate when you are tired and when you are not!

(my riyal's worth!)

Techman
12th May 2005, 20:49
The new proposal is for 48 hrs average over 52 weeks. With no op out.

It has gone through the European Parliament but still needs to go through the Council.

And I don't see any of the long haul, or short haul, operations on the continent being affected by this. So why should all the fuss?

Just more phobia and ignorance perhaps?

Engineer
13th May 2005, 06:18
Certain workers are not subject the 48 hours regulations, because they are governed by sector-specific provisions.

Air transport, is covered by the Aviation Directive (2000/79/EC). This Directive affects all mobile workers in commercial air transport (both flight crew and cabin crew), but not workers employed in General Aviation.

It appears that any amendment to the rule will effect only those workers in GA

References DTI (http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/work_time_regs/wtr1.htm#section1) and Directive 2000/79/EC (http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2000/l_302/l_30220001201en00570060.pdf&e=9888)

Airbus Girl
13th May 2005, 07:26
How come its OK for all other workers to have a life by being restricted to 48 hours a week, but not pilots?!!

Dream Buster
13th May 2005, 09:20
I'm sure most of you must have read that Donkeys get a 1 hour lunch break.

From The Times 12/05/05 :-

Donkeys working on Blackpool pleasure beach were also granted a 48 hour week yesterday and council inspectors will check that they are getting their full lunch break.
Councillors discussed what a donkey should get for lunch and decided that it should be about an hour. The sands will be patrolled to ensure no donkeys are missing out on their employment rights.
The 200 plus animals carry children for rides along the beaches throughout the summer. Council rules state donkeys must only work from 10am - 7 pm, have an hour off for lunch and must have every Friday off.
Officials said they wanted to ensure their donkeys were happy and healthy as they have been part of the resort's history since Victorian times.
The donkey's employment rights will be protected by the council's donkey inspectors to ensure they are not being overworked by their owners. They will also get their annual "donkey MoT" by vets to ensure they are healthy enough to work.
They will line up on the sand on Friday, their day of rest, while officials, accompanied by vets, check their hooves, ears, teeth and coats. Any owner whose animal is not up to scratch will not get an operators licence.
The animals, which were first brought to Britain to toil down mines, take tens of thousands of children on £2 rides each season.
A council spokesman said: "We do spot checks throughout the summer season to make sure they are having a break".
"Some people might think it is quite a hard day on the beach with no break on a busy day. It is an important part of our tourism business.
"We want the donkeys to be happy and healthy. The donkeys' Friday off is a by- law that has been in place for, well, donkeys years".

Discuss, if you see ANY similarities.

:ok:

Groundgripper
13th May 2005, 09:34
Ah, but does it apply to the donkeys' drivers?

GG

View From The Ground
15th May 2005, 11:35
I work for an airport services company, in a management position. I must say that whilst I am comfortable with the introduction of a 48 hour working week, there will be large numbers of my team who will not be. There are members of my team who always 'want' with absolutely no pressure from us to work many more than 48 hours per week, and who complain quite vociferously if they are not able/allowed to do so.
I agree that there must be protection against abuse, for example in my Company we make it clear that signing out of the 48 hour clause is definately voluntary, and any company that does not follow this should have action taken against them.
I realise that there is always an argument that higher basic wages would mean that staff would not have to work so much overtime, and this is true to an extent, although our Company has increased basic salary by between 12% and 30% over the last couple of years, and even those enjoying the larger increase are still very hungry for overtime.
I guess what I am saying is that we should protect the freedom of the staff to work more than 48 hours but have sufficient safeguards to ensure that they are not obliged to do so by their employers.