The worst job possible?

[Bravo73]

Advert in this week's Helidata (UK classified publication):

Pilot Required

We have been instructed by a wealthy individual to source a personal pilot for his B206 Jetranger. This is an immediate full time position with an excellent remumeration package, including accomodation. The successful candidate will also be expected to carry out other duties, including driving and acting as "Ambassador" when required. In the first instance please call XXXXX at XXXXX who will carry out initial interviews.



Now, I've got my own ideas about this job and think that it could possibly be one of the worst flying jobs around. Are they looking for a pilot or a doormat?

Thoughts/comments anyone?



B73

[pilotwolf]

Guess it depends on the sex of the wealthy individual and what the other duties involve! :)

PW

[Bravo73]

Well, I guess "for his B206 Jetranger" might be bit of a giveaway! ;)

And other duties probably involve carrying bags, answering phones, sweeping floors, serving breakfast etc etc.


But I'd be more worried about being stuck in a field at the wrong end of the country, in the middle of winter, in worsening weather with night approaching and trying to get the 'wealthy individual' to understand that it really isn't safe to fly home, although he might have been on numerous airliners in similar conditions....

[pilotwolf]

True! :O But hey it's a modern world - who are we to discriminate!

Have emailed for more details to see what the requirements are!

PW

[TheFlyingSquirrel]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v650/theflyingsquirrel/forsale9.jpg

[twinstar_ca]

i'm a little more concerned about the ad in the bottom left hand corner looking for a freelance instructor..

preferably also cpl(h)??? wouldn't that kind of be mandatory?? :ooh:

[Whirlygig]

preferably also cpl(h)??? wouldn't that kind of be mandatory??
No.

In the days of yore, one could be an instructor on a PPL(H) (UK CAA licence - pre JAA). These instructors still have grandfather rights to continue instructing on their PPL. However, I believe that this qualification is FI (R) i.e. restricted.

Cheers

Whirlygig

[helicopter-redeye]

i'm a little more concerned about the ad in the bottom left hand corner looking for a freelance instructor..


especially as they offer the training !:p ;)

NB can't be that weathy John, if he's only got a 206...;)

[twinstar_ca]

i didn't know that, wgig... thanks for the insight!! :ok:

[Bravo73]

h-r - NB can't be that weathy John, if he's only got a 206... My thoughts exactly! :ok:

Brassed Off - fair enough to see it from the other side, I guess. But what you say throws up a whole 'nother bag of worms. I am very aware of the legality of the situation and the fact that it is a 'private' rather than 'commercial' operation but should a PPL really be doing this job? And getting paid for it? ie getting paid to fly? (whatever the pay slip might say about being a Personal Slave, ooops, I mean Assistant...)

After four years I had over 1300hrs Is that all? In any other flying job, you'd be looking at nearer 2000-2500hrs. I imagine for the same period in Aberdeen, you would've flown nearly 3200hrs. That's a lot of spare time to be a skivvy.

Surely it is worth doing a few dirty jobs to gain those valuable turbine hours. Really? But where do you draw the line? Presuming that you're still on your PPL and he wants to take a few of his mates and business associates (ie 20) with him to Aintree. So you ferry them all in from a nearby hotel. Is that right? And, yes, I know that at best it's a 'grey area' legally but ethically? (Now I'm not saying for a second that this actually happened but I'm sure you know where I'm coming from...)

Paid to fly is the best way to fly even if you do have to take the flak. Paid to fly? On a PPL? Are you really saying that PPLs should go for this job?

in all weather, day and night. In a VFR Jetranger???? With 'only' a PPL? And probably very low time to boot? Now, once again, I am aware of the legality of the situation but are you saying that you'd recommend this job to a friend or family member? I know that I wouldn't.

I don't mean to come across as antigonistic so please don't take it the wrong way but I really feel that these things can't be left un-said (and it's all of course IMHO).


Regards,

B73


PS Oh, TheFlyingSquirrel, I didn't link directly to the ad (or mention any contact details) because I only just wanted to bring it up as a 'discussion point'. I didn't really actually want the word to spread about this job. Are you sure that you do?

[Whirlygig]

But with so many new-qualified CPLs wanting to get their first break in order to get the experience and hours, this job could be ideal.

Although no hours requirements are mentioned, I would suspect that it would be low-hour candidates applying.

In this day, one can't be too choosy - surely it's better than the new-qual CPL who offers to work for nothing?

B73, you mentioned the origin of the advert so it's not beyond the wit of man to dig it out. TFS hasn't "spread the word"; just saved me 10 minutes!

Cheers

Whirlygig

[Bravo73]

B73, you mentioned the origin of the advert so it's not beyond the wit of man to dig it out. Indeed I did. And it was because I believe that you should always refer to your sources (so that people know that you're not telling porkies). Finding the actual ad probably should've taken closer to 30 sec than 10 minutes, I hope. ;)

surely it's better than the new-qual CPL who offers to work for nothing? What, a PPL flying for renumeration? It amounts to about the same thing in my book. Neither situation is doing the rest of us any favours really. And after what Brassed Off said, I'm beginning to think that CPLs might even price themselves out of this job. When I made my initial post, I had never even considered that a PPL might go for it. Presuming that the applicant has got a debt to service (£15k for the PPL, £50k for the CPL), who's going to be willing to take the lowest wages??? :uhoh:

[Whirlygig]

taken closer to 30 sec than 10 minutes, I hope
Figure of speech - that's all. By mentioning the source (quite rightly) word will still spread.

surely it's better than the new-qual CPL who offers to work for nothing? What, a PPL flying for renumeration
You misunderstand me - I wasn't referring to Brassed Off - I meant that working as Pilot/Chauffer/Chief Cook and Bottle Washer for a low hours CPL was possibly a good opportunity and better than those who work for nothing.

I can understand that you see these sorts of roles as being detrimental to the image and standing of professional pilots but... we all have to start somewhere and in this economic climate, that "somewhere" is right at the bottom.

Cheers

Whirlygig

[TheFlyingSquirrel]

Let's hope the ' duties ' are disimilar to the ones expected of Prince Charles' personal staff - massage and a little " suprise " at the end ! Now that's not worth a 1000 hours turbine is it? ( Maybe doesn't apply to the Whirlys of this world !)

TFS

(Bravo - I think you'd already let the cat bolt, to use a variation on a well known idiom )

[SilsoeSid]

Why do I get the feeling that this thread was started to deter any prospective applicants?

:suspect:

[Droopystop]

What made me laugh was the "consultancy" doing the initial interview - "Helicopters R Go". Wouldn't be my first choice of a company name if I wanted people to take me seriously. (Knowing me, I have just put my foot in it and Helicopters R Go is a leading pilot agency!)

But what has a low time CPL(H) got to loose apart from the cost of a mobile phone call? Definitely worth a shot in the dark.

[SilsoeSid]

But what has a low time CPL(H) got to loose apart from the cost of a mobile phone call? Definitely worth a shot in the dark.
I refer to my previous post. :suspect:


p.s. http://www.helicoptersrgo.co.uk/

[Droopystop]

Consider my words suitably eaten.

[Steve76]

The worse job possible?
You really must be kidding.

[Bravo73]

Brassed Off - Hmmm, now we don't have to resort to silly (ie how much would it cost if I trained for 1300hrs in a B206...) arguments, do we? You know that it doesn't actually work like that in the real world. A more viable alternative might be the more 'traditional' route of PPL, CPL, FI, Job, 1500hrs. (Or even in your 'good old days', PPL, FI, Job, CPL).

And to address a couple of your other points:
Where is the pilot who is actually going to have vast experience in a 206 in bad weather and at night going to come from. Er, Canada, the US, even over here in humble ol' Blighty. But this probably brings us to the crux of the matter - legality and ethics aside, is this really a job for a low-time girl/guy? I would argue that it's actually a job for a reasonably experienced 206 Pilot who, most importantly, has got the balls to say 'no' when 'no' is needed. As has been discussed many times on this board, a freshly licensed girl/guy (even with a 'mighty' CPL) who really, really needs that 1st job, probably wouldn't have the required experience/will. And put simply, the experienced guy/girl who should really be doing the job wouldn't even give it a second look. And rightly so, IMHO.

But I've also noticed that you've deftly avoided some of the earlier issues that your original post raised. Would you mind answering these questions: Should PPLs be flying for renumeration? In all weather, day and night - in a VFR Jetranger? Would you recommend this job to a friend or family member? Many thanks.


Whirlygig - you see these sorts of roles as being detrimental to the image and standing of professional pilots Well, not really. Any commercial job involves an element of bag carrying and 'yes, sir, no, sir'. The danger with this job is being stuck in a field at the wrong end of the country, in the middle of winter, in worsening weather with night approaching and trying to get the 'wealthy individual' to understand that it really isn't safe to fly home, although he might have been on numerous airliners in similar conditions....

we all have to start somewhere and in this economic climate, that "somewhere" is right at the bottom. Sure is. But you could always just follow the well-worn, 'traditional' path of PPL, CPL, FI, Job. (In another thread, I said that you'd have to be either 'exceptionally lucky or exceptionally well connected' to get a job with just a CPL. I think that this is a case of being exceptionally UNlucky).


TFS - I think you'd already let the cat bolt Well, I personally think that being advertised in a national publication left that particular cattery door open (to continue your idiom).


SilsoeSid - Why do I get the feeling that this thread was started to deter any prospective applicants? Really? Do you think so? Was it me stating "are you saying that you'd recommend this job to a friend or family member? I know that I wouldn't." that was the giveaway? I'm not even sure of what conspiracy theory it is that you're alluding to this time. I'm just surprised that you haven't illustrated your point with an amusing and pithy little image... :hmm:


Droopystop - But what has a low time CPL(H) got to loose apart from the cost of a mobile phone call? Your self-respect?


Steve76 - The worse job possible? You really must be kidding You're right. Shovelling sh*t must be a worse job. And I'm sure that there's probably someone in this world who has to shovel sh*t by helicopter. But this job is pretty low down the scale on the grand scheme of things.


Gee, don'cha just love PPRuNe? A quick post about something that might come up in any crewroom and suddenly there's talk of conspiracy theories and the like. Slightly more worrying is that it unearthed details of some slightly more risky operations (PPLs flying for renumeration etc). I'm personally not a big fan of the Campaign Against Aviation but I hope that this is one situation/operation that they will be keeping a very close eye on...

And just to cast another light on things - occasionally, yacht-based jobs come up where the pilot has to fly newer, often twin engined a/c around some of the nicer parts of the world (the Med or the Caribbean). During their non-flying time, they might be expected to scrub the occasional deck or two (ie 'other duties'). Now, the general consensus was that these jobs should be avoided yet some on this board are actively encouraging others to go for this particular B206 job. As our American cousins might say, 'Go Figure'!


B73

[SilsoeSid]

I'm just surprised that you haven't illustrated your point with an amusing and pithy little image...
Ok, if you insist,

Here is Bravo73
http://www.atule.com/Cowboys%20Photos/High%20Horse.jpg

The reason I said "Why do I get the feeling that this thread was started to deter any prospective applicants?" is because
I cannot see any other reason for you posting this thread entitled, 'The worst job possible?'.



http://www.worstjob.com/images/toilet.gif

Regards
SS

(enough pics for you?)

[TheFlyingSquirrel]

tee hee - nice one SS !

[Bravo73]

Many thanks, SS. True to form as usual. :D (I'm constantly bemused by how Googles Images must've enrichened your life... ;))

So I guess that both your and Steve76's answers would be a 'no' to the question: 'Is this the worst job possible?' My opinion (and it is, of course, only that) is obviously different.

Am I trying to deter people from applying? Well, if you put it that way, I guess I am. Certainly trying to deter those people who might not have any other options (ie low-time CPLs). But trying to deter people so that I might have a better stab at the job (as I took your implied conspiracy theory to read), then well, I'll leave you to make your own conclusions on that one...!


And the best of luck to any one who does apply. You'll certainly need it.


Regards,

B73


PS Sid - aren't I still up there?

[SilsoeSid]

And the best of luck to any one who does apply. You'll certainly need it.
Is it really such a bad job?

"Full time position with an excellent remumeration package, including accommodation".

http://www.learnit.com/Samples/PowerPoint/PowerPoint%2097/CHATEAU.GIF


"Other duties, including driving".

http://www.nuclear-dawn.com/temp/db9.jpg

"Also be expected to carry out and acting as "Ambassador" when required.

http://www.fave.ca/p/p052/p052s137AlbertSchultzHeatherVale.jpg Quote- I would like to thank B73 for not applying for this job!


And to top it all, "Personal pilot for his B206 Jetranger".

The worst job possible? IMHO, Nope, (subject to contract scrutiny), I don't think so!

SS


PS Sid - aren't I still up there? No, you've been put down! ;)

[Steve76]

Apologies for the POM bashing ahead of time but unfortunately some of your team ask for it...

Calling this the worst job flying just emphasises how naive and uneducated most of the English flying fraternity are to the "real" world of flying operations most of the rest of the planet perform on a day to day basis. It does not compare remotely to some of the jobs/situations and employers most pilots have been forced to endure to achieve positions in the helicopter industry.

Sure not everyone has to endure hardship for the cause but ask around this forum and you will hear some stories that will shock and awe you. You might even think the persons are kidding but I assure you, they are all fact.

Good luck to the lucky guy/girl who nails this job. I wish I would've been so fortunate.

[212man]

I agree with Steve on this one; a somewhat embarrassing indication of perspective.

I have no personal experience, but I would hazard a guess that the following jobs may be worse:

Lagos Street Trader,
Bangkok Hooker
South African Miner

But I may be wrong (frequently am!)

[fishtits]

Proctologist? Imagine that on a Monday morning with a hangover....

As you were...

;)

[rotorrookie]

every flying job is better than no flying job......or what

[ROTORVATION]

Hi guys and gals,

Has anyone had anymore genuine feedback on this position?

RV

[pilotwolf]

Had an email asking for my CV and saying they'd be in touch - that was early last week.

PW

[fflyboy101]

I had an interview/flight review a couple of weeks ago but was told that I didn't really have enough bad weather experience, but my details would be passed onto the Gent with the money. Still hoping as yet till, someone gets the position anyway.

Was nice to fly the Jetranger again though. :ok:

[eagle 86]

Bad weather and jetrangers - good luck to who ever gets the job!!

[autosync]

I didn't really have enough bad weather experience
Why would they want you to have experience flying in bad weather in a 206?
As well as being "An ambassador" and possibly secretary and gardener and whatever else this big egoed individual can come up with, what happens when you say no?
From what we can gather so far, this guy sounds like the type of person who cannot accept that money can't buy everything, in other words he sounds like a complete .............
Funny thing about when you come across people like that, and you tell them they should have forked out aonther couple of million for an IFR machine, they are often quickly put in their place!

I do think this falls under the 10 foot bargepole category

[Gomer Pylot]

This is not possibly the 'worst job possible'. I once had a job skinning rats, and that wasn't even the worst job I ever had. The job under discussion is likely not the best job possible, but it's far from the worst.

[Bravo73]

Well, Sid (apologies for the delay - been away) but if you put it like that, gee, I might even be tempted. :yuk:

But thinking about it, are you sure that the 'accommodation' might not look something like this:

http://www.holidayofmagic.com/mansiongaleria/images/magnum11_jpg.jpg


And the car:
http://vea.qc.ca/vea/v/fer308gts78.jpg

Do you think that the guy might have a H500 as well that he might let you fly...?
http://members.aol.com/vtcomedian/images/tcscopter.jpg
http://www.magnum-pi.de/gallery/images/tmheli.jpg


Who knows, there might even be a bit of spare time to do some private investigating on the side... ;)



But whilst we're on the picture theme, I just hope that it doesn't end up like this:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40752000/jpg/_40752123_somshelicoptercrash203.jpg
If you need reminding, this was a recent incident where an under-experienced pilot launched a B206 in poor weather conditions. RIP.


And on that note, Sid, I'll leave the floor to you. For your encore...


Brassed Off - Nicely ducked on the issues again. You'll be pleased to hear though that the feeling is mutual. To be honest, I hope that I never have to share a cockpit with you. I just wouldn't be sure of what other corners you might be willing to cut...

To Steve76, 212man, Gomer Pylot et al - I'm sorry if I might have caused some confusion with the subject title. I kinda presumed that because this was posted in a pro Heli-pilots forum (as opposed to JetBlast) that it might be refering to the 'worst heli job possible'. Apologies if I presumed a bit too much common sense on your part... :E The subject title has been amended accordingly.


Over and out,

B73


Edited to add: I tried changing the subject title but it would only allow me to edit the subject of the first post. If a Mod is reading this, is there any way that you can amend the Thread subject? Many thanks.

Edited (again) to include the 'm' that Sid so helpfully pointed out was missing.

[SilsoeSid]

Nice one B73,

I guess the 'Bravo' stands for 'bitter' ;)


I for one see nothing wrong in the accommodation you showed us, (apart from your spelling of it!). It is on the North Western coast of the Mediterranean island of Corsica.(check out the picture 'properties') Galeria is 110 miles from Monaco. What's that, an hour away? I guess thats not too bad a place to live/work!

Nor would I turn up my nose at a job that would give me the chance to drive a Ferrari 308 GTS. (Depending on which Magnum series you want to refer to be it, 1979 308 GTS, 1981 308 GTSi or 1984 308 GTS QV) .

You should be informed that Magnum already has a pilot for his H500, TC, so that job isn't vacant.

With that lifestyle, I'd sure like to do a little 'private investigation' of a few of the fillies who frequent it! :E

But your biggest problem, B73, is the thought you have that only inexperienced pilots crash in bad weather!
(Would appreciate the link to that incident you pictured.)

Have a nice day,
SS
:ok:

Oh! By the way B73, you can't have, quote:"Over and Out"!!!!

[Bravo73]

Sid,

To avoid this thread creeping too far, please check your PMs.


B73

[SilsoeSid]

B73,

In respect of the PM system, please let me bring your point into the public domain. I'm sure it would be of interest to many here and further the discussion somewhat.

Regards,

SS

[212man]

"To Steve76, 212man, Gomer Pylot et al - I'm sorry if I might have caused some confusion with the subject title"

That's okay; I'm easily confused.

[Bravo73]

Sure thing, Sid.


(Sheesh, now I'm really asking for it...:uhoh: )

[Gomer Pylot]

Well, even for a helicopter job, I doubt it's the worst possible. The worst I've personally seen, although I've never been desperate enough to do it, is the notorious 'pilot-pumper' used by Grasso Offshore Services. You fly your own 206, no weather minimums, with no maintenance at all because it's a Part 91 operation, and do all the work on a number of offshore platforms. You work 14 on/7 off, live offshore on your work hitch in a temporary building, doing your own cooking, housekeeping, etc in addition to the the normal work, which is at least 12 hours/day, all for less money than even new-hire pilots make at the major operators. I think (at least I hope) those days are gone, but that was the worst flying job I've seen.

[Nigerian Expat Outlaw]

206B, up to 200 sectors a day, the only expat living offshore so I have to eat African food (which was fine, but not 3 meals a day, 5 days a week), treated less than a taxi driver (taking a video 26 miles, i.e. 52 miles round trip because the Platform Production Supervisor forgot the tape), but earning revenue for THE COMPANY.

Did it, paid the bills. Moved on.:ok:

NEO

[blme]

Just a funny comment

The Queens flight

Paid as footmen, not pilots. The DofE cannot stand his Staff in uniform, ie higher rank than him.

Now, thats the worst job in the world!

Private flying not AOC.

Legally could be done on a PPL, so there.

[SilsoeSid]

Thank you B73.

Now, your thing about inexperienced pilots.

"If you need reminding, this was a recent incident where an under-experienced pilot launched a B206 in poor weather conditions. RIP." The impression given on anything I can find on this incident is that the commander was an experienced pilot as this is mention by 2 seperate people. Obviously without the AAIB report this cannot be confirmed.

I repeat, "But your biggest problem, B73, is the thought you have that only inexperienced pilots crash in bad weather!"

Judging by your PM words of advice to me of;
"If you can remember back to your days of flying singles then I hope that you'll agree that
'poor weather + low experience pilot + unstabilised single (B206) = potential recipe for disaster' ,
you will not like it when i don't agree with that statement.
There is a potential recipe everytime skids go light, regardless of composition!

I don't know what category you put yourself in, but if you remember only one thing;

Experienced pilots can crash in good weather.
(I would rather fly with an 'inexperienced' pilot who is a bit cautious, than an 'experienced' one with no fear!)
Ok, that may be technically 2 things !

Perhaps you would like to research at what hourage a rotary pilot is likely to have an incident. You may be surprised!

Remember, in a helicopter, if there's nothing going wrong, it's just about to! :ugh:

SS

[212man]

blme,
I think you'll find they are quite happy actually (obviously blissful ignorance!) Well the one I know is.

[Bravo73]

Well, Sid, we seem to be spiltting hairs on this one. Like I said in the PM, we also seem to be singing from the same hymn sheet.

Maybe an updated 'formula' is needed:

poor weather + low experience pilot + unstabilised single (B206) = much higher chance of a potential recipe for disaster

But it's all kinda academic though. As you say, any pilot can have something go wrong at any time. Surely it's a matter of operating so as to try to reduce your exposure to that (or any) risk?

And regarding the deleted incident (as also mentioned in the PM): Although the commander was an experienced pilot, he (unfortunately) wasn't experienced enough (ie under-experienced) to know when to stay on the ground. We will probably never know the pressures that he was under to lift again in such dire conditions but it took 4 lives so that we could all learn from his mistake. RIP.

Regards,

B73





RIP?
I don't know if you're including the pilot in that, but it seem inconsistent with your allegations against someone who sadly isn't around to defend himself.
Heliport

[SilsoeSid]

B73,

If you think we are singing from the same hymn sheet, there must be quite a few songs on it, as I am not singing the same tune as you.

Nice update to the formula, buckling under pressure ? However I still wouldn't agree with the phrase "much higher chance of a potential recipe for disaster". Sounds as if you are trying to get all the bases loaded on that one.

But now your song to sing is that it's all academic. Come on B73, which side of the fence are you going to land on?

I am trying to fathom out your definition of 'experienced', or indeed this phrase you are using, 'experienced enough'. What on earth do you mean when you say;
"Although the commander was an experienced pilot, he (unfortunately) wasn't experienced enough (ie under-experienced) to know when to stay on the ground."
How can you say such a thing, without people thinking as Brassed Off does, "sharing a cockpit with you would be very difficult due to the size of your head." whilst reading your posts?

Perhaps by your definition, we should all get nice 9-5, Mon-Fri jobs that enable us to keep our feet on the ground.

'And finally';
"We will probably never know the pressures that he was under to lift again in such dire conditions but it took 4 lives so that we could all learn from his mistake. RIP."

Have you seen the report? Please tell us why this incident occured, as you seem to have laid all blame onto the pilot launching in bad weather.



It's a nice day out there today, let's keep it that way. :ok:

SS

[bbbeenthere]

I fancy a change ; does anyone know the Academy of Perfection that B73 may have been a graduate?
I am handsome, extremely adaptable, not one to ever make a mistake, and could fit the course in during the next couple of weeks

[archos]

B 73

I came across yet another updated formula: The so-called "GIRFOD" (Greatest Imagineable Recipe For Desaster).
Extremely poor weather + any pilot + any single/twin + flying at 100 ft agl. + not spotting the 300 ft tree in his/her flight path.
No chance for even the most under experienced pilot.

[TheFlyingSquirrel]

Got a thanks but no thanks in the mail - Worth a try though - anyway, i'm useless at ironing !!

[pilotwolf]

Got a thanks but no thanks in the mail - Worth a try though - anyway, i'm useless at ironing !!

Ditto!

PW

[fflyboy101]

So has anyone heard who did get the job???

[MPR]

Looks like the best\worst job might be on hold...... unless he buys another JetRanger

G-RIAN (John Green - Helicopters R Go) - became G-OJEF a few weeks ago, it appears to have rolled over at Haverfordwest

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=176413

[EMS R22]

I think the job description has changed.They are no longer after a pilot ,they just want a tea boy.

[overpitched]

I wonder if it was the newly hired pilot ?????? Short career if it was I guess

[SilsoeSid]

New addition to the job spec..............Engineering background essential!! :{

:ok:
SS

(was the weather a factor! :E )

[MPR]

look no further than me! I even trained to make tea as a student. Just lacking in the engineering stakes.

[SASless]

If all they want is a tea boy...the wages shall have improved from that offered originally.

[hemac]

Bravo 73

I'm sure your intentions are generally honourable, but as a new comer to the professional world of flying your thread strikes me as someone very much intent on preserving their livelihood.

Give the new boys a break, or is it that you want this paticular job?

H.

[Bravo73]

Ah, jeez hemac,

I was hoping that this thread was just going to 'die a death' but you've asked me a question so I feel obliged to answer.

or is it that you want this paticular job? Well, are you sure you're not SilageSid in disguise? I refer you back to my posts of the 4th & 5th of May. I'm so far away from wanting this job you won't believe it.

What started as an idle thought on my part about what a cr@ppy job this was developed into a brief discussion on matters such as PPLs flying for renumeration and VFR machines & pilots potentially being pressurised into flying in IFR conditions (with the usual added dose of 'Sid cynism and bitterness'). I reasoned that this was a job for an experienced 206 pilot who had the b@lls when to say 'no'. Unfortunately, an experienced pilot wouldn't look twice at the job so it'd be left to a low experienced guy/gal.

SECTION REMOVED - Rumour network or not, your "speculation" about pilot error is out of order, and grossly unfair to another pilot whose professional reputation might be damaged by irresponsible comments of that sort.
Heliport

Thanks for that, Heliport. Can I please remind you and others that it wasn't myself who first speculated about the link between this job and the accident at Haverfordwest? It was MPR on the 29th of May. Is his post not going to be 'moderated' as well?

And you're right, Sid. I am going to ignore you.

If you do want to 'go pro' and stay onshore, please take Camp Freddie's advice which is repeated here time and time again. You won't get a job (that you'll actually want) with just a CPL(H). Budget for an FI(R) rating as well. Then your opportunities will multiply.


But then again, this is all just 'IMHO' so regards,

B73

[SilsoeSid]

B73,

Please don't feel that you have to reply to this ;)

I've lost count how many times others have been accused of being SS in disguise, a thing covered many times on other threads, but let me assure you there is only one username that I use on pprune and any other sites I visit.

I'm glad you feel so smug, now that a crash has happened. Thankfully, no-one was seriously hurt, so perhaps too many people won't be on your back for that one.

I cant really see how you can see yourself vindicated.
From the BBC report (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/4588509.stm) the crash happened during landing at 'about 1700 BST'.

No bad weather, no pressonitis (as they were at the destination) and any other reason that you have thrown up on this thread, IMHO, was possibly not a factor in this incident.

I'm sure others could comment on the last part of your post.

ATB:ok:
SS

[Heliport]

Bravo73

No problem, as far as I can see, with a link between this job and the accident at Haverfordwest.

The problem was your speculation about the cause of that accident.

Heliport

[thecontroller]

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=172975

did anyone here take this job? if so, what was it like?