squeakmail
27th Feb 2000, 08:13
Hi...another pilot phraseology question for you.
Having read my UK CAP413 R/T book...I was taught to use two figure numbers for reporting runways....and I agree (not that makes any difference).
I now fly in the USA...and have just heard that one of my common airfields has mandated to pilots that it will refer to the main runway as "Runway Four...NOT Runway Zero Four".
I'd be curious to know if this is in accordance with ICAO, if this is just another USA 'opt out' of International standards or, if this is just the grumpy old sod at the airfield trying to have everything his own way.
What is the ICAO standard phrase and what is the FAA mandated phrase according to the good book of words to be used?
I know if I'd refered to "Runway Four" when I used to fly into Heathrow and Manchester, they would have become very upset....but that just could be because neither Heathrow or Manchester have a Runway (Zero) Four.
------------------
LIVE in peace...or REST in it!
Having read my UK CAP413 R/T book...I was taught to use two figure numbers for reporting runways....and I agree (not that makes any difference).
I now fly in the USA...and have just heard that one of my common airfields has mandated to pilots that it will refer to the main runway as "Runway Four...NOT Runway Zero Four".
I'd be curious to know if this is in accordance with ICAO, if this is just another USA 'opt out' of International standards or, if this is just the grumpy old sod at the airfield trying to have everything his own way.
What is the ICAO standard phrase and what is the FAA mandated phrase according to the good book of words to be used?
I know if I'd refered to "Runway Four" when I used to fly into Heathrow and Manchester, they would have become very upset....but that just could be because neither Heathrow or Manchester have a Runway (Zero) Four.
------------------
LIVE in peace...or REST in it!