PDA

View Full Version : Crash at Jersey Airport


eeks94
16th Oct 2004, 13:17
Does anyone no the details about the aircrash (involving a light aircraft)at jersey airport this morning, the pilot died but does anyone know anything else:confused: :ouch:

putco
16th Oct 2004, 13:23
only that this is the third in the dreaded series...

RIP

ETOPS
16th Oct 2004, 17:48
Just this on the BBC news:-

One dead, one hurt in plane crash


Police have sealed off the area
It is understood one person has died and another has been injured in a crash involving a light aircraft at Jersey's airport.
It is thought the accident happened at about 0750 BST on Saturday.

The area near Les Ormes golf course has been sealed off by Jersey police, who are investigating the incident and will be issuing a statement later.

Officers from the Air Accident Investigation Branch are now flying into the island from the UK.

sammypilot
16th Oct 2004, 18:19
Putco obviously missed out on the news of the DC3 that crashed in Colombia yesterday killing all three on board. If you are superstitious enough to believe that incidents go in threes then that would be the third.

Tinstaafl
16th Oct 2004, 18:26
If third in the series implies accidents happen in threes (or whatever): There is no "...third in the dreaded series". The 'series' has been acruing continuously since Icarus. It's another fatal to add to the woe of all the previous ones. The significance of 'three' is only because people choose to reset their counter to zero after the number reaches '3'. They could choose any arbitrary number they like but it's still meaningless. I think I'll choose 1.9070874443 x 10^978810908675. :hmm:

Charlie Fox
17th Oct 2004, 12:23
The pilot killed when his light plane crashed into a hillside near Jersey airport has still not been named. He has not yet been formally identified.

It's thought that the single-engined Mooney aircraft suffered mechanical failure moments after take-off.

The plane came down in a steep-sided field near Mont a la Brune. The pilot was pronounced dead at the scene.

The UK Air Accident Investigation Branch, together with local police and fire officers, are trying to pinpoint the cause of the crash.

DerekWarrior1
18th Oct 2004, 10:27
kishna, we're talking 'The impossible turn' here. As you say, it's far too early to speculate but this does look like an EFATO and the situation aggravated by, reportedly, poor weather. Also, the western end of runway 27 at Jersey is prone to turbulence due to the terrain. Very sad, and our hearts must go out to the family of the pilot and a speedy recovery to the injured passenger.

dirkdj
18th Oct 2004, 10:47
Not knowing anything about the circumstances of the crash in Jersey, I will not comment but give the details on a crash that occurred a year earlier with my hangarmate involved in his Mooney. he is just now beginning to walk again.

In short: on a previous trip a fuel tank was allowed to run empty in flight, no big deal, a switch was made to the other tank and the flight continued.

After landing both tanks were filled to the brim. Starting was on the second tank that was not previously run dry, then a flight was made of about one hour.

A week later a new flight was planned, engine started on the second tank, but after the runup and engine checks, with the aircraft on the runway ready for takeoff, fuel selector was switched to the first tank again (the one that was run dry and had not been used since).

Result: just enough fuel in the lines to get up to about 100ft over the runway followed by silence as the trapped air reaches the engine.

Conclusion: three people seriously injured, one aircraft total loss. Could have been much worse if the engine had run for 10 seconds more.

Stoney X
18th Oct 2004, 11:17
I think its high time that the CAA safety people issue some recommendations regarding engine failures after take off.
So it's the CAA's responsibility to continually reminds us of things we were taught during PPL training? Shouldn't we be practicing EFATOs, PFLs, etc on a regular basis already?

The info I have is that the pilot was alone in the aircraft. My sympathies are with his family.

Regards
Stoney X

ThePirateKing
18th Oct 2004, 11:20
Actual conclusion: swap tanks early in the power checks, before you get anywhere near a runway.

TPK:ok:

Sensible
18th Oct 2004, 11:55
I thought that it was standard practice to start and taxi on one tank then switch to the other for run up checks and take off. Is this familiarity where "experienced" pilots believe that they don't need to do full run up checks any more? :hmm:

Flyin'Dutch'
18th Oct 2004, 12:28
Nobody can comment on the accident at the beginning of this thread as nothing is known but talking about fuel management before take off.

There seem to be 2 schools of thought.

One is that you start and taxi out on the lowest tank and then change to the fullest before you do the run-up and engine checks leaving it on that tank for the take-off and initial climb.

That works indeed well for most aeroplanes with shortish fuel lines.

The other method is to start on the fullest tank and taxy, run up take off and climb on that tank until you are in the cruise and then change. Advantage is that you know that your fuel supply is good and uninterrupted. Drawback is that you don't know if the other tank(s) are feeding.

Best thing to do is to use your POH or noddle and work out something that works for you and your aeroplane and stick to that.

FD

ThePirateKing
18th Oct 2004, 12:51
FD,

Indeed, not changing tanks at all is a perfectly good solution subject to the caveats you mention.

But I hope we can all agree that swapping tanks on the runway is frankly insane!

TPK:ok:

Whipping Boy's SATCO
18th Oct 2004, 13:34
kishna, from CAA Safety Sense leaflet 1D, Para 4:

In the event of engine failure after take-off,
if the runway remaining is long enough,
re-land and if not, never attempt to turn
back. Use areas ahead of you and go for
the best site. It is a question of knowing
your aircraft, your level of experience and
practice and working out beforehand your
best option at the aerodrome in use. (One
day, at a safe height, and well away from
the circuit, try a 180° turn at idle rpm and
see how much height you lose!)


PS. I am not speculating as to the cause of this accident. I am merely responding to a specific post.

DerekWarrior1
18th Oct 2004, 15:41
The Jersey Evening Post have now published a more comprehensive report on their website. The pilot was a Mr Alan Armstrong, managing director of a Jersey finance company and he was departing JSY in his Mooney single en route to Teeside. According to witnessses, the engine failed shortly after take off and the aircraft burst into flames upon impact with the ground. There is no mention of a passenger. His family, apparently, live in the UK.

Flap40
18th Oct 2004, 17:04
The name on the JEP website is Andrew not Alan. Aircraft was G-EKMW ex D-EKMW.

RIP

Wee Weasley Welshman
19th Oct 2004, 07:43
I think it safer on the majority of the tired GA fleet out there to change tanks only once airborne with plenty of height allowing a calm restart or forced landing. This practice of teaching PPLs to change tanks on the ground prior to take off has caused two incidents that I know of.

Invariably PPL's are looking for an expeditious departure and by doing a quick power check at the holding point they may only have drawn a few litres after changing tanks. Similarly its not uncommon for the tank change to get overlooked. They suddenly remember just prior to take off and hurredly 'correct' their oversight by switching.

Avoid all the pitfalls and do it downwind or as part of the first FREDA or first leg setting or even 1000ft checks.

Cheers

WWW

dirkdj
19th Oct 2004, 10:33
I have run a tank dry on the Mooney as discussed above. It took about 30-45 seconds before we had normal flow again. This is no big deal at safe altitude.

I recommend starting the engine on tank A, doing taxi and runup on tank B and not changing tanks again until at a safe altitude.

Also if a tank was run dry, just filling it up will not get rid of the air in that part of the fuel line that sits beween the tank outlet and the fuel selector valve. That air has only one way to go and engines don't run to well on an air/air mixture.

On the Mooney or Beech this part of the fuel line can be drained only if the fuel selector valve is moved to the right position.

On all these checks, it helps if the pilot remembers WHY he is doing it a particular way rather than blindly following a checklist.

Dave T-S
8th Nov 2004, 11:50
Andy the pilot was a friend of mine. He used to commute into London from Essex on the Stansted Express before he moved job to Jersey, he then kept his home in Essex and commuted from Fowlmere to Jersey weekly in the Mooney.

Apparently he was flying to Teeside to see his son at a sports day when the crash happened. He left a wife and two sons. He was a really nice guy and I and his other fellow commuters was really shocked when we heard what had happened. I last saw him only about a week before the accident when he made one of his periodic appearances on the train. :(

Paul_Sengupta
20th Nov 2004, 00:49
Oh no, that chap. I had a chat with him one afternoon at Fowlmere when I drove in there a few months ago. Seemed like a nice chap. Helpful. He was just about to depart so I watched him get in his plane and take off. My condolances to anyone who knew him.