Numpo-Nigit
17th Mar 2001, 19:27
Within the last few days, all those LATCC CSCs who have opted for departure under the Early Retirement scheme have been approached by management. The essence of the enquiry is to ascertain their views on a possible return to LATCC, on an individual contract basis, after their retirement to "help out".
The official line is that this has been decided as the best option to help reduce delays due to chronic staff shortages for summer 2001. This seems odd. It would surely be easier and more cost-effective to attempt to renegotiate the actual retirement date with individuals, perhaps agreeing to delay the date by a month or two, by mutual agreement.
A cynic might think the present course of action is more suited to the staffing needs of summer 2002 at LATCC, where there would (will?) be a significant shortfall of trained CSCs.
Could it be that an announcement of a NERC O-date delay until October 2002 is imminent?
The official line is that this has been decided as the best option to help reduce delays due to chronic staff shortages for summer 2001. This seems odd. It would surely be easier and more cost-effective to attempt to renegotiate the actual retirement date with individuals, perhaps agreeing to delay the date by a month or two, by mutual agreement.
A cynic might think the present course of action is more suited to the staffing needs of summer 2002 at LATCC, where there would (will?) be a significant shortfall of trained CSCs.
Could it be that an announcement of a NERC O-date delay until October 2002 is imminent?