de La Valette
9th Jan 2000, 13:17
Scenario: B737 requires (say) 1700 metres landing length from Flight Manual. Flight Manual also provides correct Vref for weight in order to satisfy the distance needed. This is for normal landing because the term "short field" is not defined in the manual. The speed used is generally 1.3 Vs, depending on certification parameters.
Most Cessna manuals give tables with a specific speed entitled Short Field Distances, which are also based on a flight manual chart speed of 1.3Vs. Why therefore is one called normal landing, and the other short field when the speeds are both based on the Flight Manual figures?
If 1.3Vs speeds are safe (30% above the power off stall), then why do flying schools teach faster speeds over the fence as a normal landing while reserving the 1.3Vs speed for short field landings. How long must a field be in GA parlance to deserve the title Short Field?
And if 747's, and other jet transports use 1.3Vs as normal procedure, are these then short field landings?
I read somewhere that true short field landings, sometimes known as Precautionary landings, were a military combat landing approaching just above the stall at 1.1VS power on stall.There was no float, the aircraft was flared with power on then cut - same as an aircraft carrier approach. Obviously not appropriate to civil flying schools.
Would it be correct to assume therefore, that the flying school syllabus short field landing at 1.3Vs over the fence is really a normal landing as used routinely in jet transport landings, and that short fields are in the eye of the beholder. Confusing, isn't it?
Most Cessna manuals give tables with a specific speed entitled Short Field Distances, which are also based on a flight manual chart speed of 1.3Vs. Why therefore is one called normal landing, and the other short field when the speeds are both based on the Flight Manual figures?
If 1.3Vs speeds are safe (30% above the power off stall), then why do flying schools teach faster speeds over the fence as a normal landing while reserving the 1.3Vs speed for short field landings. How long must a field be in GA parlance to deserve the title Short Field?
And if 747's, and other jet transports use 1.3Vs as normal procedure, are these then short field landings?
I read somewhere that true short field landings, sometimes known as Precautionary landings, were a military combat landing approaching just above the stall at 1.1VS power on stall.There was no float, the aircraft was flared with power on then cut - same as an aircraft carrier approach. Obviously not appropriate to civil flying schools.
Would it be correct to assume therefore, that the flying school syllabus short field landing at 1.3Vs over the fence is really a normal landing as used routinely in jet transport landings, and that short fields are in the eye of the beholder. Confusing, isn't it?