![]() |
Norwegian are buying Wideroe. I'm wondering if Wideroe will still be flying Bergen - STN in a year's time
|
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
(Post 11462704)
Norwegian are buying Wideroe. I'm wondering if Wideroe will still be flying Bergen - STN in a year's time
‘Norwegian will acquire Wideroe from WF Holding, with the airline continuing to operate as a separate company with its own brand, organisation and headquarters in Bodo’ Quote above from Business Traveller. https://www.businesstraveller.com/bu...rrier-wideroe/ |
Last paragraphs states a series of Lufthansa flights. https://travelweekly.co.uk/news/air/...-from-heathrow
|
Originally Posted by Buster the Bear
(Post 11471529)
Last paragraphs states a series of Lufthansa flights. https://travelweekly.co.uk/news/air/...-from-heathrow
|
With STN's passenger numbers rising substantially again this summer, and with the check in area becoming very crowded especially during peak times, I wonder if MAG did make the right decision in relocating the security area from its original central area to where it is now at the far left of the terminal and getting rid of zones J&K? Certainly didn't feel as congested then as it can be now. I presume that where the old security area was is now part of the departure lounge? Assuming the terminal extension gets the go ahead, it'll be interesting to see what MAG's plans are- would be nice if they were to roll back on the shops a bit in favour of more areas for passengers to sit down, as STN's problem now is that it has become almost chocked by the retail outlets MAG have managed to cram in. The terminal definitely felt more spacious even in the last few years of BAA ownership :(
|
Originally Posted by JW95
(Post 11471561)
on the shops a bit in favour of more areas for passengers to sit down,
|
Originally Posted by VickersVicount
(Post 11471577)
I think we all know there is zero chance of that when its even more all about revenue streams now… People never walk with their feet and are quite willing to line up to queue in their masses, complaining when often they've paid less than £100 round trip and bought nothing in any any of the shops.
|
Originally Posted by pamann
(Post 11471676)
Also the terminal layout before security was relocated, those extra check-in zones were rarely used and were often empty like a ghost town. Even less now I’d say (if changes hadn’t been made) with more of Stansted’s customers using hand luggage only. But the shore-line check-in area will be well received once finished. The old check-in areas do feel dated and cramped as they’re no longer the ‘island style’ of Sir Norman Foster’s design.
|
Originally Posted by JW95
(Post 11471834)
I'm surprised you say that, because I remember seeing zones J&K being frequently used by FR prior to being knocked down? Their check in zones always seemed to be busy (more so now anyway!). I do remember reading in the STN press release notes that MAG had identified less pax using check in just prior to the terminal redevelopment, but it now feels as though the check in area is too small and more people are using it during peak times. I agree with you RE. the shoreline check in though, zone 500 definitely stands out as looking smart and modern compared to zones A-F. Is there a timeline for when it will be fully completed?
But works to expand security begin later this year with the entrance to security moving forward to give more space for the new security lanes and to add more queuing space. |
Originally Posted by STN406
(Post 11472207)
No timeline at this stage officially. Probably won’t get anything put out until the extension proposal gets accepted. Even then I’d imagine it won’t be the first project taken on.
But works to expand security begin later this year with the entrance to security moving forward to give more space for the new security lanes and to add more queuing space. |
Lufthansa
Lufthansa look to be extending their ad-hoc STN-MUC service over Oktoberfest with several dates now available over Christmas/New Year and Feb half-term periods.
|
Lufthansa
Indeed and with better timings, see they are loaded for double daily on some periods with 1 operated by Lufthansa and 1 operated by Eurowings.
No doubt it would work very well as a year round addition, as would a flight to CDG with AF and a flight to AMS with KLM for both the stand alone and Hub connection opportunities |
I think you are thinking of 2015-2017 with Eurowings, RYR are much stronger now. As for AF & KLM, slots are almost impossible to get and risk diluting LHR.
|
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....e8d3a9672.jpeg
Well it varies , Friday 22 dec example here is one eurowings and one Lufthansa. saturday 23rd shows two operated by Lufthansa |
Originally Posted by Paulesx
(Post 11475986)
Indeed and with better timings, see they are loaded for double daily on some periods with 1 operated by Lufthansa and 1 operated by Eurowings.
No doubt it would work very well as a year round addition, as would a flight to CDG with AF and a flight to AMS with KLM for both the stand alone and Hub connection opportunities |
Stansted Transformation Project
Sent out to MAG colleagues today. More insight into the terminal expansion. ‘London Stansted Airport has submitted a planning application to extend the back of the terminal by 16,500m2.
This scheme will provide increased terminal space to cater for additional passengers and provide a great experience at each stage of the passenger journey, from check-in through to immigration. The scheme includes:
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....c73102a5b.jpeg No plans or applications has been uploaded to the local council’s planing application page as of yet. Would imagine it would come on after the weekend now. |
Originally Posted by STN406
(Post 11479291)
Sent out to MAG colleagues today. More insight into the terminal expansion.‘London Stansted Airport has submitted a planning application to extend the back of the terminal by 16,500m2.
This scheme will provide increased terminal space to cater for additional passengers and provide a great experience at each stage of the passenger journey, from check-in through to immigration. The scheme includes:
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....c73102a5b.jpeg No plans or applications has been uploaded to the local council’s planing application page as of yet. Would imagine it would come on after the weekend now. Overall I’m pleased as it’s about time some money was spent by MAG on improvements at Stansted. One thing to note however
|
Originally Posted by pamann
(Post 11479323)
Overall I’m pleased as it’s about time some money was spent by MAG on improvements at Stansted.
One thing to note however Relax clearly doesn’t include more seating. This is what’s desperately needed. Relax in MAG’s terms is to fleece the passenger of their dosh with more shops and restaurants. Stansted resembles a shopping mall as it is. What is also needed is more lounge options. The current lounge is woeful and lacks any feeling of exclusivity. It feels like you’re in a canteen in some factory basement. |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11479328)
Ah, the standard response - hard to believe, but people actually like bars, restaurants and shops in airports, and it gives the airport operators chance to make up for the low fees airlines pay. I'm sure that if fares and fees went up the airports would be happy to shuffle people through the terminal as quickly as possible, with minimum investment.
|
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11479328)
Ah, the standard response - hard to believe, but people actually like bars, restaurants and shops in airports, and it gives the airport operators chance to make up for the low fees airlines pay. I'm sure that if fares and fees went up the airports would be happy to shuffle people through the terminal as quickly as possible, with minimum investment.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.