PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   Monarch 4 (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/599682-monarch-4-a.html)

tubby linton 3rd October 2017 23:59

The airline has been in intensive care since 2014 after the Mantegazza family had done their best to kill it. The subsequent terror events in some of the principal markets worsened the situation,and the company was too weak to be able respond to these challenges. Brexit was a complete red herring.
Unanswered questions include the alleged link between Greybull and the Mantegazzas, and also how the latter managed to get away with one of the biggest pension robberies in UK history.

compton3bravo 4th October 2017 04:18

I would not say Brexit was a red herring, more the fall in the pound against the Euro and Dollar (fuel etc.) after the vote. Talking to restauranteurs, bar owners down here saying that June and July were very good (Irish, Scandinavians) but August although very busy business was down about five per cent. Brits not spending as much, although personally I still find living here in Spain here most of the year is still far cheaper than the UK but we are not really on holiday. I agree about Greybull, remember Comet.

crewmeal 4th October 2017 05:43

How did Monarch pay for their fuel? In Dollars? If so that would be a financial nightmare as the pound has had a rough ride over the past 15 months.

yeo valley 4th October 2017 06:43

yes fuel paid and bought in dollars.

toledoashley 4th October 2017 06:44

Or that Greybull made a mark-up on their supplies (fuel etc) to guarantee a return?

a1anx 4th October 2017 07:00

Ryanair.
 
I thought at first that O'Leary would be rubbing his hands with glee at the thought of all those Monarch pilots looking for a job. Unfortunately for him ( and them ) Monarch's fleet seems to be all Airbus, although some of the crews will be ex Boeing.

I don't know how easy or difficult it is for someone who has only flown Airbus to convert onto a more 'conventional' aircraft ?

bringbackthe80s 4th October 2017 07:30

I hope it's a windup. An airplane is an airplane and a pilot is a pilot (hopefully).

No worries though, I would be very surprised if one single person applies to ryr

111KAB 4th October 2017 08:05

https://bv.world/exclusive/2017/10/m...-all-go-wrong/

Falck 4th October 2017 08:13

I doubt it as well.
Qatar is having a roadshow to pick up Monarch pilots.

But indeed easyJet and Virgin Atlantic have a note on their respective careersites
to stimulate Monarch people to apply.
Some of the Monarch pilots have some good long haul experience from previous
Monarch times. Ideal for Virgin to take on board.

Gibair 4th October 2017 09:13

Thanks for the link 111KAB, interesting read.

Andy_S 4th October 2017 09:21


Originally Posted by lee757 (Post 9912977)
Also i bet they weren't trying to sell it for a nominal fee last week to save the jobs and all the passengers etc. I bet EZY, Norwegian, BA etc would have bought it for a quid.

I bet they wouldn't........

rog747 4th October 2017 09:45


Originally Posted by SLFandProud (Post 9913082)
As much as I admire your certainty, and as much as I doubt mine... ATOL covered about 5% of Monarch's business, I understand - being the "package holiday" type stuff. The other 95% has nothing to do with ATOL and won't be paid for by it.

That said, of course the CAA/Government won't pick up the whole tab - they'll claim from insurers and card companies. But it's certainly a relief for passengers that it's the CAA/HMG having that fight instead of them, I'm sure.

the passengers bookings who are not covered by ATOL after the 16th of OCT will have to pay themselves to get home and they can claim the lost Monarch tickets from their credit card companies if they bought their ticket that way or by their travel insurance end user or airline failure cover if they had it -

the CAA do not claim from card companies
The CAA expects debit card issuers to join credit card issuers in refunding customers’ bookings, although there is no legal requirement for them to do so. which is good news now.

HM Govt nor the CAA does not pay any of this debacle up to 15th Oct - as I said the funding for repatriation and the planning of is all met from the huge air travel reserves fund surplus which stands at over £139m
if the £60m costs of this event are true then that is almost half of the Fund being used - if that is so then i can see maybe extra amounts required for Bonds from operators in the near future - should Thomas Cook go under as was seen as a possibility last year then the Fund would be decimated

the CAA have since this time last year known it was possible Monarch would go under with a 291m loss so re-pat's and planning would have been well established as has been seen

yes Wamos are flying an ex MON A330 on rescue flights along with a 747-400

Jonty 4th October 2017 10:01

2 things.

Tax Payers are covering the cost of this, most of Monarchs bookings are not covered by any fund. Even the transport secretary stated this during his conference speech. Who do we believe? Chris Greyling or random internet poster?

Also, Thomas Cook hasn’t been going under since 2011. I suggest you try and keep up with the times.

MKY661 4th October 2017 10:36


I agree about Greybull, remember Comet.
This is actually the 4th company that has become insolvent that Greybull have been involved in. My Local and Riley's Sports Bars are the other two.

silverelise 4th October 2017 11:14


Originally Posted by rog747 (Post 9913780)
yes Wamos are flying an ex MON A330 on rescue flights

Is that definitely the case? They used to have EOMA but that's been leased to another operator. The only 330 remaining on their fleet is not ex MON.

rog747 4th October 2017 11:37

yes and the other ex monarch A330 which is also now with wamos but is on lease to Biman

rog747 4th October 2017 11:42


Originally Posted by Jonty (Post 9913794)
2 things.

Tax Payers are covering the cost of this, most of Monarchs bookings are not covered by any fund. Even the transport secretary stated this during his conference speech. Who do we believe? Chris Greyling or random internet poster?

Also, Thomas Cook hasn’t been going under since 2011. I suggest you try and keep up with the times.

lol you believe Chris grayling OMG ..... and as for random - i have been in the (mostly holiday) airline business since 1972 - i think i know a wee bit - and I worked for Monarch as well

my example of CAA re-pat plans using thomas cook as an example was just that -- an example
so wind your neck in ta ever so -

Gertrude the Wombat 4th October 2017 11:48


Originally Posted by rog747 (Post 9913900)
lol you believe Chris grayling OMG .....

Well quite. At the very least, conference party speeches lack all the detail, and whilst the detail may appear online somewhere a day or three later it's not that common for the journos to bother to look it up, so it's quite easy for there to be a considerable gap between early reports of what was said and eventual implementation even if nobody is trying to be dishonest.

rog747 4th October 2017 12:03

the reserve fund will take a big hit if £60m is correct -

but frankly its utter bollox that HM Govt or the CAA is picking up much or any tab for this in the end much will be resourced from the Fund - that is what the travel trust fund was set up for - that fund money is ring fenced for this purpose so an utter nonsense Grayling is saying this that taxpayers are picking up the bill - yes maybe at first then recharge the CAA and the fund for much of it....

pabely 4th October 2017 12:45

Monarch boss set up new firm on same day doomed airline plunged into administration - Daily Record

Other parts of the Press put blame squarely on Senior Management


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.