Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 11636209)
Must be a typo. I can’t see how 500 dinners would fit into the available space but it must be still viewed as an improvement for the lounge.
Reading through the description they say 500 guests not diners. The top section will probably be packed as it’s a bar, probably bar stools and small tables. Dining I would think for 200-250 at a guess at lower levels. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....49e5b594c.jpeg |
Two El Al 737-9s today, assuming for increased Passover capacity, with the loss of EZY flights, surprised they didn't try to push a 3rd one in.
|
ELAL are very selective at Luton who can access the luggage hold or has access to the great deal of luggage these flights carry. Some would call it racial profiling and discriminatory and is against everything the airport owner claims to stand for.
|
Seems there is no Dart today after a local power cut at just before 6am. Was the power cut caused by the Dart, as after the power went back on few minutes later the Dart was still knackered and remains so?
The Dart is fed via a transformer in Eaton Green Road. |
[QUOTE=LTNman;11640438]Seems there is no Dart today after a local power cut at just before 6am. Was the power cut caused by the Dart, as after the power went back on few minutes later the Dart was still knackered and remains so?
The Dart is fed via a transformer in Eaton Green Road.[/QUOTE Post Codes that were affected by power failure - AL3 6 AL3 7 AL3 8 AL4 8 AL4 9 AL5 1 AL5 2 AL5 3 AL5 4 AL5 5 AL6 9 CB23 2 LU1 1 LU1 2 LU1 3 LU1 4 LU1 5 LU2 0 LU2 7 LU2 8 LU2 9 SG4 8 |
I would suggest that those posts codes reflect more than one incident, as some of those post codes go into Cambridgeshire and down to St Albans.
|
L postcodes as well !
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...-b2532758.html |
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 11644298)
|
|
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story. As reported here before, according to the airport’s own noise stats the A321neo is noisier than the aircraft it replaces so don’t believe the spin.
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 11646271)
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story. As reported here before, according to the airport’s own noise stats the A321neo is noisier than the aircraft it replaces so don’t believe the spin.
You are only worried about noise on a hot summers night when you choose to have your windows open. When the rest of the world is expanding airports at a rate never seen before and airplane orders stretching over the horizon you are happy that it just not in your back yard! |
Now tell me that pollution and greenhouse gases are going to drop at Luton with Level 4 Airport Accreditation and all the other BS you have listed or will there actually be a massive increase with planned expansion?
As a side note LRT have been reported to the ASA for greenwashing. Seems their attempt has won one convert here but I respect your view to turn a blind eye to the bigger picture. No sign of the new drop off area opening in the Mid Term. I think they are waiting for the super expensive CTA drop off to open. I predict it will be the dearest drop off in the country by a long way. |
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 11646396)
Now tell me that pollution and greenhouse gases are going to drop at Luton with Level 4 Airport Accreditation and all the other BS you have listed or will there actually be a massive increase with planned expansion?
As a side note LRT have been reported to the ASA for greenwashing. Seems their attempt has won one convert here but I respect your view to turn a blind eye to the bigger picture. |
If the status quo is maintained in the future regarding movements then greenhouse gases will drop. If movements are set to nearly double then despite best efforts pollution will increase.
Remember that LRT has not included aircraft emissions in any or its targets. |
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 11646271)
Never let the truth get in the way of a good story. As reported here before, according to the airport’s own noise stats the A321neo is noisier than the aircraft it replaces so don’t believe the spin.
Rated as QC 0.25 vs QC 1.0. These figures are fiction then? Night Flying restrictions may encourage lower QC aircraft, we know there are reduced charges. What is also silly, an aircraft like CL600 or C525 which are <81dB and QC 0 is still banned in Summer months! |
Rated as QC 0.25 vs QC 1.0. These figures are fiction then? |
Airbus, these QC ratings I thought were done by the likes of CAA, EASA & FAA?
|
Originally Posted by pabely
(Post 11647095)
Airbus, these QC ratings I thought were done by the likes of CAA, EASA & FAA?
|
https://www.lutontoday.co.uk/news/pe...-luton-4613179
Worth remembering the venue is by the side of the M1 link road to the airport. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:07. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.