Re: No more night time bizjets at SEN
Originally Posted by asdf1234
(Post 10487724)
They wouldn't bother to put the NOTAM out there unless they have decided not to be open 24/7. Put it this way - will someone be in the FBO at 2200hrs if there are no pre-booked movements and a business jet diverts to SEN unannounced? The answer is no because they will likely be closed. And the NOTAM does suggest other restrictions - i.e. no oxygen service available at the FBO and this has to be arranged with a local operator.
I see it's not just Tagron that is miffed with my post - the Southend spotters facebook page suggests I posted out of a love for STN and LTN and a dislike for SEN!!! Back to my original question - is the FBO closing overnight (when there are no pre-booked movements) because of a lack of business? Or is there another reason? Lack of qualified staff perhaps? I'm just curious and if nobody here knows the answer, then fine. |
But Glyn Jones, CEO of Stobart Aviation, says the firm has listened to residents on multiple occasions and tried to offer solutions. He said: “The average taxi time from the stand to runway is three minutes. “We have nine aeroplanes based here. They launch in the first hour – that’s the busiest that it gets. The longest hold was less than ten minutes. This is not down to Stobart who are only following the rules but the council who set the rules. What I find stunning is that the council does not appear to get a cut from passenger fees seeing they own the asset. I wonder who led the original lease negotiations? Probably the same person who negotiated Brexit. If the council got passenger income they would be more likely to ignore the complaints and promote expansion which happens at my local airport. For airport expansion to go ahead I can see a complete night ban but would that be a bad thing if it meant more passengers from the airports supporters point of view? |
LTNman
I think you will find that in every case where SEN has changed hands in recent decades it has just been a matter of assigning the Lease by the then Leaseholder to the new 'buyer', which Southend Council doesn't have the right to 'unreasonably' refuse under English leasehold law. There has been no opportunity for the Council to amend the Lease and they have only been able to introduce night movement restrictions etc. through the planning system. They are unable to impose a 'passenger fee' unless the Leaseholder were to agree an amendment to the Lease to that effect, so really the Council should not be blamed. |
Presumably the leaseholder pays an annual fee to the Council? It wouldn't be in the Council's interests for the airport to stumble.
|
When Glyn Jones states that there are nine aircraft based at SEN that is not telling the whole truth is it. While that is the number of scheduled pax based aircraft, there are also the JOTA fleet of seven Bae146/RJ pax/cargo charter aircraft (not sure if they are all in service) and of course the two ASL 737-400F. Then we have the non based arrivals/departures of Loganair and Wizz Air as well. Maybe this post is not relevant to the above discussion but hey ho i thought i would post it anyway.
|
aurigny72
In fairness to Glyn he immediately went on to say "They launch in the first hour" so it was obvious he was referring to the scheduled pax operation. |
Originally Posted by Expressflight
(Post 10636186)
aurigny72
In fairness to Glyn he immediately went on to say "They launch in the first hour" so it was obvious he was referring to the scheduled pax operation. |
Wizzair to Sibiu
Not sure if this has been mentioned before but it looks like this route is returning to Luton from the beginning of the summer season(29/3) according to their website. What have the loads been like? |
The Southend route has only just started, a bit quick off the mark aren’t they?
|
It also looks like Iasi will not be going ahead, which was announced only a month or so ago. Bucharest and Vilnius still on sale. Perhaps space/slots became available at LTN? |
I ma afraid it looks like Wizz will use SEN as LTN overflow- but given that Luton is hitting if not exceeding its planning limit that should still give SEN capacity unless loads/yields prove much worse.
|
Iasi commences in August |
Originally Posted by AirLCY
(Post 10637096)
Iasi commences in August |
Flyone's Chisinau service is resuming on Tuesdays from January 7th and moving to twice weekly in the summer.
|
Boris...
My spies tell me the PM just transited through SEN. Are my spies sipping the xmas brandy early or did Boris actually choose SEN over Northolt/Stansted/Luton?
|
Quite correct.
|
Originally Posted by Expressflight
(Post 10637410)
Quite correct.
|
And more SEN news
https://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/180...ike-christmas/
Gary Pearce, GMB Regional Organiser said: "Our members at Southend Airport who work in baggage handling, security, aircraft dispatch and flight operations have been raising their concerns with management in relation to the lack of staff, lack of protective clothing insufficient training, changes to their contracts and what they are paid compared to staff in other local airports for months |
Originally Posted by Plane mad 134
(Post 10617014)
Flybe major expansion at Southend as they add:
· SEN-NCL 2x daily eff 29th March 2020 Great news for Southend! |
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
(Post 10640732)
Someone should tell Stobart to get this started a day early...Sunderland are away at Roots Hall! The route would get off to a winning start, unlike the Shrimpers |
I guess there is a wider point across all airports that arbitrary summer/winter schedule dates miss this kind of stuff and sometimes defy logic. I’ve noticed in the past for example that Med destinations have ceased before the end of Half Term, but that’s something EZY/FR have got much smarter at in recent years. |
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
(Post 10640732)
Someone should tell Stobart to get this started a day early...Sunderland are away at Roots Hall! The route would get off to a winning start, unlike the Shrimpers |
Originally Posted by SARF
(Post 10641155)
the flight back would be very quite as we slip,to minus 100 goal difference
|
No very lively, it’s Sunderland that are travelling. Bumper bar sales too |
Sibiu
Two flights today to Sibiu. Start of the Christmas rush? Must be doing ok. Is it still thought that flights will return to Luton summer 2020?
|
Both Sibiu flights today were sold out and there will be two flights next Sunday as well.
|
Originally Posted by Expressflight
(Post 10642578)
Both Sibiu flights today were sold out and there will be two flights next Sunday as well.
|
There is huge demand just before Xmas for people all over Europe to get on a plane and see their families in late Dec, when people have moved country to find work
Perhaps a better evaluation of SEN-SBZ might be outside the Xmas peak |
Originally Posted by SEN Observer
(Post 10642582)
Thank you Expressflight. If they are doing that well, why on earth are they going back to Luton? Anybody have any idea what's behind this?
|
Originally Posted by SEN Observer
(Post 10642582)
Thank you Expressflight. If they are doing that well, why on earth are they going back to Luton? Anybody have any idea what's behind this?
|
Xmas strike
Just been confirmed that the threatened strike at SEN is to take place on the 24th, 25th and 26th December after talks at ACAS failed to find a solution to the Union's issues surrounding staff safety and training.
|
And in other news:
1. Councillors have raised night time noise issues with airport and told all flights are within existing planning constraints. I wonder when the Council will wake up to the fact that using the Quota Count noise system implemented at LHR, LGW and STN is just not suitable for a short runway airport such as SEN? Most probably never. 2. Ryanair launch twice weekly Girona route for S2020. |
asdf1234
Surely the RYR SEN-GRO route was announced weeks ago was it not? I'm prepared to be persuaded, but why is the Quota Count noise system not suitable for "a short runway airport such as SEN" yet appropriate for LHR, LGW and STN? |
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
(Post 10642674)
I think we just have to accept that no matter how full or high yielding Wizz flights are at SEN the airline’s preference is to be at LTN. Flights and routes will inevitably come and go depending on capacity at LTN. This is just a budget version of what has long occurred between LGW/STN and LHR. With the UK leaving the EU I would imagine there will be a slow decline in London passenger numbers as some migrants drift home and are not replaced so I would think there will be a retreat to fortress Luton at some point. Also the council will soon vote on a planning application to increase not only noise but passenger figures to 19 million. They can do this repeatedly to 22.5 million as this is the stated capacity within the existing boundary although they did claim once it was 18 million. |
Story from just before xmas about a Loganair E145 being 'too heavy' to take off from Southend so 5 passengers had to get off.
“When the weather cleared at Derry, a combination of low pressure and rainfall left the runway surface at Southend in a condition which imposed limitations on the aircraft performance. The aircraft was consequently over its maximum available take-off weight for the conditions. " https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...-a9259266.html |
Makes me think that the Embraer must be a very marginal aircraft for Southend if it cannot fly a domestic route without offloading passengers while for Easyjet and Ryanair it was just another day unless they also had to off load passengers which wasn’t reported.
Found this very interesting article about air density and other weather issues making a difference to runway performance. https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/...eoff_and_Climb |
The article suggests it had a lot of baggage as well as a full load of pax so probably any other day of the year and any other conditions this wouldn’t have been a problem. Its quite a non-story, only becoming a ‘story’ because one of their ‘journalists’ was amongst the pax. |
More worrying is it cost £200 for a one way flight!!
|
Originally Posted by stewyb
(Post 10652065)
More worrying is it cost £200 for a one way flight!!
|
Better to be £200 and make a profit rather than the route only supporting £40 fares and the route gets pulled.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:06. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.