Could this help open new routes to airports in France and Portugal?
|
Jet 2
BFS to BOJ confirmed on Wednesdays starting 29/5/19, departs 14.45. Finishing 25/9/19
They still have a spare AM and PM slots on Wednesday so maybe some more to come |
Would no doubt help to boost traffic to other airports in the group
|
Originally Posted by GAZMO
(Post 10128944)
BFS to BOJ confirmed on Wednesdays starting 29/5/19, departs 14.45. Finishing 25/9/19
They still have a spare AM and PM slots on Wednesday so maybe some more to come |
Ezy
kefalonia being reportedly as destination on ni travel website although not yet on EZY website https://nitravelnews.com/news/easyje...s-now-on-sale/ |
So when do you all think FR will throw the toys out of the pram and say rates are too high ?
|
Originally Posted by GAZMO
(Post 10130546)
kefalonia being reportedly as destination on ni travel website although not yet on EZY website https://nitravelnews.com/news/easyje...s-now-on-sale/ |
Thats more likely
|
I wonder why VS has showed no interest in a NY route from BFS or even Canada they have good brand awareness in NI |
Originally Posted by BHD2BFS
(Post 10132429)
I wonder why VS has showed no interest in a NY route from BFS or even Canada they have good brand awareness in NI |
Originally Posted by BHD2BFS
(Post 10132429)
I wonder why VS has showed no interest in a NY route from BFS or even Canada they have good brand awareness in NI If you look at it from a Belfast perspective, then we could maybe base a 787 here, and offer a couple of Toronto rotations and maybe three New York rotations each week. Throw in an Orlando at the weekend, and we may well be able to justify the aircraft. But from the VS perspective, they operate a 'business' type service from LHR, and the holiday routes from LGW/MAN/GLA/BFS. |
Dublin is quite expensive this year! I wonder will more people connect from Heathrow? I was just looking at Chicago from BHD and the prices are £200 cheaper. |
Originally Posted by NWSRG
(Post 10132583)
But from the VS perspective, they operate a 'business' type service from LHR, and the holiday routes from LGW/MAN/GLA/BFS.
|
Originally Posted by Speedhawk
(Post 10132467)
I think there are a couple of reasons why Virgin have showed no interest in BFS to JFK/BOS/YYZ flights, and are unlikely to do so anytime soon;
United were unable to make BFS-EWR work, despite having daily B752 flights providing connections to over 100 destinations. Virgin would have to use the much larger B789/A333, and Delta's JFK hub provides a lot fewer connections than United at EWR. Additional services from BFS would require Virgin to order additional aircraft or axe existing routes, as there's simply no capacity available for the flights. Demand on transatlantic routes from BFS isn't yet high enough to sustain more than one airline. Norwegian is (albeit seasonally) still operating from BFS, meaning any potential Virgin service would need to rely heavily on transfer passengers, as a large number of point-to-point and budget travellers would choose to fly Norwegian. I don't think Virgin will add flights to JFK/BOS/YYZ from BFS anytime soon, but if their MCO service continues to be a success then I could see the frequency being increased, and there is always a remote possibility of flights to LAS/BGI. |
Originally Posted by owenc
(Post 10132849)
United was too expensive, and it did work. I think one year they carried 90,000 passengers, then it decreased thereafter for whatever reason. I think it would be hard to compete with Dublin's 7 daily flights to NYC.
|
So you think the route could’ve worked if they continue d to have it year round? |
Are we back to the United Newark conversation?
It made money, that was stated uncategorically in public evidence before a committee. They decided the airframes could make more money on other routes. That's how it works when you rely on a non-local airline that has no vested interest in the community. |
How many commerical private owned airline companies provide services purely as a vested interest for the community? |
They dumped us and others for transcon. |
Oh the crocodile tears from people in this thread complaining that CO ‘dumped us’, when these same people flew long haul from Dublin. The route was losing money in 2011 - so it’s unfair to say that United didn’t try and maintain the connectivity. https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/tra...-28655745.html With Norwegian unsurprisingly failing to make it work, I can’t see anyone else taking up the route until perhaps EI get the 321LR, and a subsidy. A big subsidy. Oh and a cherry on top of that subsidy. Their Jet blue connectivity in JFK could help the viability. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:43. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.