PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   Qatar Airways (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/280492-qatar-airways.html)

hetfield 30th May 2007 13:16

Qatar Airways
 
Qatar Airways ordered 80 A350

http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,485686,00.html

vapilot2004 30th May 2007 13:28

Good Job all around
 
It appears that Airbus had taken my advice and gone with a barrel design ala Boeing. :p

Earlier, I had thought that they (Airbus) had missed the boat on the A350WXB regarding size. Now that I have been properly educated, I see that more than a few 772 sized aeroplanes will be scheduled for replacement by the A350's proposed EIS.

Mudfoot 30th May 2007 16:51

From vapilot2004:

It appears that Airbus had taken my advice and gone with a barrel design
... and they thank you for your idea! - but aren't all modern a/c of a barrel design? :confused: (meant as tongue-in-cheek)

So many design changes, so little time...

Cheers, y'all.

Putt 30th May 2007 22:52

Gotta have room for the SLF. BTW What's an A350?
ex Flying Tiger post P-40's
Putt

Flight Detent 31st May 2007 02:02

Are airlines still considering and/or buying Airbus are they!!!

I got the definite impression that they were on their way out !!!

Cheers....:eek:

Thylakoid 31st May 2007 09:59

I believe now they are going for the "buy one; get two for free.":}

vapilot2004 31st May 2007 11:48


Originally Posted by Flight Detent (Post 3321201)
Are airlines still considering and/or buying Airbus are they!!!
I got the definite impression that they were on their way out !!!
Cheers....:eek:

Been reading mass media, have we? :}

bjones4 31st May 2007 19:05


It appears that Airbus had taken my advice and gone with a barrel design ala Boeing
J Leahy has confirmed today that they are sticking to panels.

"I just spoke with John Leahy in Toulouse, the Airbus sales chief and the company's chief commercial officer, and he told me that contrary to last week's published report by Air Transport World, Airbus will not change the fundemental fuselage design of the A350 XWB. It still will have composite panels rather than large one-piece composite barrels that Boeing is using with the 787, Leahy said."
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/a...asp?source=rss

Geoff Thomas (of ATWOnline) states that EADS reasoning behind that is to save time, money and avoid any risks of litigation.

angels 18th Jun 2007 09:58

Good news for Rolls Royce as well. They've copped a $5.6 billion (at list prices) order for the engines.

sf25 18th Jun 2007 10:14

"...and achieves fuel efficiency levels of 2.9 litres per passenger per 100 kilometres" (from previous post).

maybe not the right place for this question, but what i always wanted to know: is a statement like above on fuel consumption of a passenger plane based on the assumption of a fully loaded plane (with max seating capacity) or an average load factor of a typical flight?
greets

what next 18th Jun 2007 10:30

Hello!

> ... is a statement like above on fuel consumption of a passenger plane based on the assumption of a fully loaded plane ...

Yes! Everything else wouldn't make sense, because there is no such thing like an 'aircraft type independent worldwide average load factor constant over time' that would be required otherwise.

Greetings, Max

sf25 18th Jun 2007 10:57

thanx max - once again pprune made me brighter ....
rainer

panda-k-bear 18th Jun 2007 11:06

Well, except I suppose it's based on the 555 seat version that Airbus uses. What if you put all 850-odd seats in and fill 'em up? A quick bit of maths suggests it'd be below 2 litres/100km. No car on Earth would get anywhere close.

angels 18th Jun 2007 11:26

More orders.

US Airways has gone for 60 A320s, 10 A330-200s and 22 A350s. There's some double counting here in that the A350s were known about. But its still $10 billion at list prices (which won't be paid).

RR engines on the A350s for $1.8 billion (GE don't make engines for the A350).

what next 18th Jun 2007 11:38

Hello!

> Well, except I suppose it's based on the 555 seat version that Airbus uses.
> What if you put all 850-odd seats in and fill 'em up? A quick bit of maths
> suggests it'd be below 2 litres/100km. No car on Earth would get anywhere
> close.

Most European cars can seat five and have a fuel consumption below 10 litres per 100 kilometers. So even if you don't count the driver, you will get about 2 l/100 km/seat. Some cars like the four-seater Volkswagen "3l Lupo" burn only 3 l /100km (therefore the designation...) which gives one liter / 100km / seat (driver not included).

Greetings, Max

drichard 18th Jun 2007 11:46

Hmmm, l/100km,

I recently went touring round northern europe, and with 5 on board we averaged 39.5mpg (not that brilliant I know, but it's a petrol car, we had the A/C on, and was fully loaded with a roof box)

Now remembering the formula that "1 mile per gallon = 235.214584 l/100km", we can see that we did 6.03... l/100 km (for 5 perons), or a little over 1.21 l/100km per bum. If I'd used a diesel, I'd be well under 0.9l/100km.

So I think, panda-k-bar, my car doesn't come from this planet. (FYI, It's a bog standard, 1.6l Honda Civic)

PAXboy 18th Jun 2007 12:08


... and achieves fuel efficiency levels of 2.9 litres per passenger per 100 kilometres.
Which must be the consumption in the cruise? The total consumption, with a long queue outbound at JFK (it was 50 mins the evening I left in January) + climb + descent + Bovingden hold + waiting for the stand to be available ... {Yes, I know I'm just snapping at the wheels :ugh:)

bnt 18th Jun 2007 12:21

The A380 is the world’s most environmentally friendly aircraft flying today and achieves fuel efficiency levels of 2.9 litres per passenger per 100 kilometres. It will make a significant contribution to the further reduction of the average fuel efficiency of the global airline fleet.
I'm thinking that's a typo, right? Not what you want to see on a high-profile press release...

angels 18th Jun 2007 12:23

Okay, here's some more.

Jazeera - 30 A320s.

GE commercial aviation services - 6 Boeing 777 freighters.

Lion Air - 40 Boeing 737-900 ERs. This is Boeing making public something that was already on their order book.

Bombardier has signed a MOU with China Aviation Industry to co-operate in the development of the ARJ21-900.

Lufthansa - 30 Embraer 190s.

JAL - 10 Embraer 170s and options on another 5.

Cheers.

4 engines 4 longhaul 18th Jun 2007 13:38

And some more:-

http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articl...mktNews&rpc=44

ALAFCO order A350's firmed up and 7 new 320's

http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articl...mktNews&rpc=44

US Airways much awiated large order.

GECAS have also order some 60 new 320's

http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre..._60_a320s.html

barit1 19th Jun 2007 00:45


It will make a significant contribution to the further reduction of the average fuel efficiency of the global airline fleet.
...and brit opines:
"I'm thinking that's a typo, right? Not what you want to see on a high-profile press release..."

Likely an error in translation - If Airbus is anything like they were 20-30 years ago, it was originally written in English, translated into French for internal review, then re-translated back to English. :rolleyes:

Luckyguy 12th Nov 2010 10:34

Qatar Airways to buy Adria Airways stake
 
Bloomberg are reporting that Qatar Airways are to buy a 50% stake in Adria Airways, Slovenia's national airline, with almost 50 years history of air travel.

Link to Adria Airways

About Adria Airways - Adria Airways - Slovenia's national carrier

Qatar Airways with a Ljubljana base ?? :oh:

Clandestino 12th Nov 2010 11:25

Deal is far from being done, if it goes through, that will be one more address to send my CV to.

WHBM 12th Nov 2010 11:57


Originally Posted by Luckyguy (Post 6055887)
Bloomberg are reporting that Qatar Airways are to buy a 50% stake in Adria Airways, Slovenia's national airline, with almost 50 years history of air travel.

You can't really say that Adria has 50 years of history - there was another airline, Inex-Adria, based in what was then another country, Yugoslavia, with a different ownership, operating in quite a different business sector, charter flights to Yugoslavia for holidaymakers, and other charters.

When the Yugoslavian civil war was in progress the whole operation was shut down, and then a new operator started up in the early 1990s in a new country, taking over some of the remnants.

In all fairness Adria themselves describe this background correctly on their own website.

Cyrano 12th Nov 2010 12:26

This is much more strategic than you think!
 

Originally Posted by Luckyguy (Post 6055887)
Qatar Airways with a Ljubljana base ?? :oh:

No, think Qatar Airways with an EU AOC, able to operate from anywhere in the EU to Qatar (or indeed, to other points from the EU, or within the EU) without any pesky protectionist EU governments seeking to restrict them in the future. Lufthansa has lobbied the German government to restrict landing rights in Germany for Emirates - this move by QR (if confirmed) would protect them against any similar restriction by any EU government in the future. "You're refusing our application to operate 3 times per day from Frankfurt to Doha with A380s? No problem, we'll wet-lease the aircraft to our Slovenian subsidiary and do it that way."

Of course it also opens the possibility that QR might like to take on other routes from the EU. QR from Heathrow to New York, anyone? Thanks to EU/US open skies, this would be possible.

There is (sorry, Slovenia) no particular geographical significance in the choice of Adria - I'd say it's available, it's not too dear, it's in a low-labour-cost economy with relatively flexible labour regulation, it has some Star Alliance links, and it has enough jet equipment to be able to make a credible case to a regulator for putting widebodies on its AOC.

Interesting times!

C.

PS it would of course be 50% minus 1 share, so that Adria would remain majority-EU-owned.

MAN777 12th Nov 2010 23:19

If it was that easy to get a foothold into Europe why hasnt EK, Etihad and every other non euro airline been snapping up euro airlines ?

Phileas Fogg 12th Nov 2010 23:34

Well just read the online reviews of Qatar's service, they have to be one of the most popular airlines to travel with, I'd say "Welcome to Europe Qatar, just don't register as an LCC in Dublin or Luton"! :)

thomasd 22nd Jan 2011 08:06

qatar airways to buy 40% of portuguese TAP
 
in the portuguese press it´s being told that the qatari airline is iminent to buy 40% of the portuguese airline tap member of star-alliance, previously this week the two countries signed an agreement of reduced fees for over flying each other airspace,(tap doesn´t fly that way..). so with this move is qatar airway trying to get into star alliance?
what would this mean for tap?and for the star alliance?

Qatar Airways poderá comprar até 40% da TAP- A Escolha do Editor - Jornal de negócios online

Bartek 19th Jul 2012 17:55

QR plans BHX and two other UK routes
 
Reported that QR is looking at establishing a new route between DOH and BHX, and two other UK routes. It is suggested that the other two routes may be a re-instatement of LGW and a new route to EDI.

Double daily to MAN also mentioned as possible.

Qatar Airways plans Birmingham-Doha route - www.travelweekly.co.uk

Cleared For A Coffee 24th Jul 2012 15:05

Any news on who the other two UK Airports that Qatar are looking at operating from are?

CabinCrewe 24th Jul 2012 15:08

See post above

OltonPete 8th Oct 2012 20:19

Oneworld it is
 
News - oneworld

Despite recent denials - it is going to happen well assuming AAB doesn't change his mind.

So EK+QF and now QR+BA and others.

How does this affect QF in oneworld if at all?

Hope this doesn't affect BHX's chances with QR, not exactly overflowing with oneworld airlines at BHX on schedule routes anyway.

In the meantime - it has actually happened, well the paperwork has if not the fitting of WiFi.

Qatar Airways receives first Boeing 787

The next two have also flown but no information whether the WiFi is fitted as yet or if they will follow the first for completion.

Pete


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:47.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.