PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   GATWICK (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/226299-gatwick.html)

PPRuNeUser0176 7th Jan 2012 19:26


I suspect the website has generated that data from a couple of slot applications by Aeroflot. But my interpretation is that the flights are Olympics related ad-hoc flights, and only operate on 25th and 26th July (presumably inbound pax) and 13th & 14th August (outbound following the end of the Olympics).
Operating a total of 8 flights during July/August.

canberra97 7th Jan 2012 23:49

Pier 1
 
Does anyone know when Pier 1 is going to be demolished, any set date for this?

chrisy08 11th Jan 2012 16:51

Delta
 
So it's going to be the 767-300, from Gatwick to Atlanta........ do the economy have AVOD?

on time all the time 11th Jan 2012 16:58

work on pier 1 should start next winter.

Seljuk22 12th Jan 2012 08:14

AirAsia X will cancel its flights from 31st March

crewmeal 12th Jan 2012 10:56

Maybe they are paving the way for Scoot

Scoot airlines | Singapore Airlines' budget carrier Sydney flights

Aero Mad 23rd Jan 2012 22:24

Other than them already having their positions established at Stansted, can anyone explain why both Air Berlin and AirAsia X have all but failed after moving over to Gatwick? I know the latter was affected by APD, cost of A340s and general European consolidation &c., but can it really be that bad? What's gone wrong?

I just find it slightly bizarre that relocating to an apparently better connected airport would affect performance so much.

Serenity 24th Jan 2012 14:43

Air Asia have cancelled all long haul flights to Europe and India.
Nothing to do with Gatwick, it would still have been cancelled if it had stayed at Stansted!!

Sark 24th Jan 2012 17:51

Security inconsistency is very frustrating especially through one airport, albeit separate terminals.
Flying out from North Terminal last week. I asked the question, "Belt off?" to which the reply was "Please yourself." I did not find it necessary to remove it and nothing further happened.

Flying out from the South terminal two days later I asked the same question only to be met with the response of, "Of course!" When I commented on the inconsitency I was 'selected' for a liquids check which took quite a time. Obviously they had targeted me because of my comment as to why there was no consistency. Pathetic action!

The travelling public deserve more respect than this.

Skipness One Echo 24th Jan 2012 21:27

Belts should always be off to be honest, indeed Glasgow had (has?) their own "special" rule where they barked at everyone to take their watches off. Right....

CabinCrewe 24th Jan 2012 21:30

Must be "had", as I have never been asked to remove my watch when going through GLA. Maybe you were wearing "bling"

Skipness One Echo 24th Jan 2012 21:37

Dear me, I wish, alas no. It was last year and they were telling everyone to take their watches off, I did query it and I was told it was a new rule. I suspect one of the team leads was just being super enthusiastic.

The96er 24th Jan 2012 21:42

U.K Airports have the right to deem anything they see fit to be a security risk above that what the DfT stipulate. MAN have recently decided that tennis rackets are now considered a risk and therefore must be checked in !!!

Aero Mad 24th Jan 2012 21:44


tennis rackets are now considered a risk and therefore must be checked in
But haven't you seen the new exploding variety??? Party started without you, it seems... highly lethal, I hear.

vctenderness 25th Jan 2012 08:53

Quote:
tennis rackets are now considered a risk and therefore must be checked in
But haven't you seen the new exploding variety??? Party started without you, it seems... highly lethal, I hear.
Have you never seen John McEnroe in action?

He made the racket into a lethal weapon every time the umpires decision went against him!

bunatern 1st Feb 2012 20:02

turkish airlines
 
turkish airlines increasing flights to 10 weekly from 24th april and from 27th may to 14 weekly.

bcn_boy 2nd Feb 2012 08:27

LHR 3rd Runway
 
Once again, another article in the Evening Standard about the UK losing £47bn in trade due to lack of runway space at LHR and few connections to the far east. This is LGW's calling whereby it can truly differentiate itself from LHR. With the likes of Vietnam Airlines as a successful example it can surely attract many more carriers therefore answering businesses complaints without the need for a 3rd runway.

Skipness One Echo 2nd Feb 2012 10:11

LHR is the hub, adding capacity to LGW is not helpful as yields are lower. The two issues should not be mixed up, you are concatenating runway and terminal capacity together with connectivity. People need to understand that there is a crucial difference. I say that as someone who enjoys using LGW many times a year.

c52 2nd Feb 2012 11:36

Never understood this business of "lack of direct flights causes UK to lose business". If I were a businessman I would not say to myself, oh, I'll pass on that opportunity because I can't fly there non-stop from LHR.

On the other hand, if there are 30 people a day willing to pay business-class fares to Mongolia, then surely some airline would make a profit with a 40 seat 737 or something, and people would happily fly from STN.

cornishsimon 2nd Feb 2012 12:18

Personally i think that there is a lot of possibility for Longhaul ex LGW, Virgin & BA already have a token Longhaul network, but the problem as Skipness says is the feed.

Take BA for example, I very much doubt they would expand Gatters currently due to the probable take over of BMI and the slots at LHR that would give them.

However, if they were to send an extra 5 7772s to Gatwick to operate more longhaul routes they would need feed, the Gatwick shorthaul route network is lacking in UK Domestic routes (some are covered by BE) as well as very much lacking in Europe, BA doesnt even operate a Paris route from from LGW, let alone German and Spanish !

cs


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.