PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   GB Airways going low cost (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/208784-gb-airways-going-low-cost.html)

Bikerpilot 29th Jan 2006 22:35

GB Airways going low cost
 
Heard today in MAN that GB is going low cost.

Zenna Fobyer 29th Jan 2006 22:40

Go on, ........ Gizza clue. What did you actually hear? Back up what you say.

What did you hear and where did you hear it from otherwise it's nonsense!

JB007 29th Jan 2006 23:24

I thought GB we're pretty much low-cost anyway, but with the BA product...

MancRy 30th Jan 2006 01:14

GB is going low cost. Plans are a bit sketchy at the moment and nothing is 100%.
Club maybe kept but it is looking increasingly like economy pax will have to pay for drinks and food.

HZ123 30th Jan 2006 08:31

For eco paxs the future for all shorthaul trips will be paying for everything apart from the seat. This could also be adopted for LGW GB and BA ops in the EU.

bozzy 30th Jan 2006 12:37

yep its true, we will be going the low cost way, with charging for food and drink and no club service as this is not doing well up here in manchester. The product is not changing down in heathrow and gatwick as the ba product is so strong down there plus they get alot more club pax.

I think they want the same product and services as ba connect, so it wont confuse the pax.

Railgun 30th Jan 2006 13:06


Originally Posted by bozzy
The product is not changing down in heathrow and gatwick as the ba product is so strong down there plus they get alot more club pax.
I think they want the same product and services as ba connect, so it wont confuse the pax.

I think it is more due to the fact that BA have not yet devalued the european product from LGW or LHR so therefore GB are not permitted to charge for food ect out of these stations. At MAN BA have taken this step so natrually GB have been able to do it.

MancRy 30th Jan 2006 14:26

Theres a few rumours. Also heard that club will be kept and the amount of rows that can be converted reduced to a few rows and that the rest will have new thinner seating.
I'd rather keep club because the full economy config is awful.
I work with Bozzy and heard aswell that club is going.

Gatwick07 30th Jan 2006 16:35

So Gatwick and Heathrow are keeping it BA style? I would have thought Manc would aswell, because you fly GB to certain destinations when you book through the BA website, therefore pax who have booked (through BA) expecting a BA service may not get one if they fly GB out of Manchester? Ho hum......

flyer55 30th Jan 2006 18:01

Sounds like BA Connect branching out so wonder what going to happen to MAN-JFK?

KTM 525 SX 30th Jan 2006 18:27

Loganair will be next.

But then are they a franchise of BA
or are they a franchise of a BACON ?

manx crab 30th Jan 2006 18:41

Do Loganair still serve food?. On my last few trips IOM-GLA its been been drinks only, no ham & cheese, beef & pickle, cheese & tomato sandwich.

Just a thought but whats going to happen to all the cheese when Bacx stop serving food:)

Buster the Bear 30th Jan 2006 18:49

Having flown Club Class from Gatwick, the product is superb, if a little expensive. I am happy to pay for executive lounges, priority boarding and extra legroom for certain trips with my family as it removes most of the stress associated with check in, flying etc.

I have found the staff on board, some of the best that I have come across. Totally professional and courteous.

MancRy 30th Jan 2006 22:11

BACX/BACON are goin low cost at MAN and BHX too.
Like i said, nothing is set in stone and we could well keep our club cabin here at MAN but we may end up losing it.
Fact is, GB aren't getting enough club passengers at MAN. IMO this is because it is not promoted enough. Unlike business routes, many of our passengers (many of which being used to charter) are unaware that we have it or that we even give drinks as complimentary in economy, for that matter.
The introduction of premium cabins on long haul charters shows that there is the desire for such service....many of GB flights are verging on long haul and there is a strategy of expanding services in the 4-5 hour flight time range.
Euro Traveller looks to be going low cost and this would give a great product differentiation between the two cabins.
But who knows, lets wait til its official.

VHF FLYER 31st Jan 2006 18:56

Tried GB/BA recently - have to say I was well satisfied. No discernable (SP?) difference between this and mainline BA - possibly better as the CC were appopriately northern and cheerful.:ok:
Need more of this product and less of the BACON (and cheese) at MAN in my opinion. How about Barcelona and Lisbon - please? pretty please?

MancRy 31st Jan 2006 20:02

Correct, our service is on a par with BA Mainline shorthaul and yes time and time again we get comments about the cabin crews personalities. We, at the MAN GB base, are young and very cheerful which is often where mainline, and to a certain extent BACX, fail.

FlyZB 31st Jan 2006 21:26

Personally I believe that GB will do well out of reverting to a buy on board service. That is of course presuming that fares will be reduced as a result? As mentioned on another forum, this does mean that people have no choice other than to fly no frills to destinations such as AGP, but it seems that this is what the majority of people travelling from MAN want. The general attitude is why pay over the odds for free food and drink on a 3 hr flight if you can get the fare for 20 quid cheaper. In most cases when I've looked for a MAN - AGP fare, GB has been more expensive than ZB, WW and LS. The travelling public going to places such as Malaga, Tenerife, etc would rather pay less and have no frills as it is such a short flight duration. ZB have got their product right to the destinations they serve. Offer competitve prices but also give passengers the option of purchasing frills such as hot meals on board. Therefore people dont pay for such luxuries in the fare, but still have the option of having them if they want. Thats why they are the number 1 scheduled carrier to AGP, ALC, TFS and FAO. They have a superior product to WW and LS at the same price. If GB offer a similar service, they will be able to attract more passengers in the same way.

Mr A Tis 31st Jan 2006 21:58

I have used both C & Y class on GB out of Manchester. Either class is very good & equal / better than BA mainline shorthaul. Crews are very chirpy & genuinely pleasant & helpful. Club was great & reasonably priced, would be a shame to lose it. Economy was priced cheaper than Monarch or Jet2 on my flights. In fact I'm Malaga bound this Friday, again cheaper than the no frills-but with frills! Please bring on Barcelona - Iberia C cabin was almost always full. My use of ZB on that route has always been very disappointing.
Don't see why LHR & LGW can retain frills & C class & us poor northerners left to lump a BA CON type service. It would be nice to have a choice.:*

MancRy 31st Jan 2006 22:31

GB/BA are often cheaper than ZB and LS and pax have commented on it numorous times and that is where the problem lies. We are competing DIRECTLY with no frills/buy on board airlines with a FRILLS service.
Our pax, with no disrespect to them, are used to charter and often dont realise the service is free and so the pay on board strategy will work. It would be good if they kept club europe though.

HZMIS 1st Feb 2006 10:12

What I find confusing is that BA have already untaken to upgrade LHR Euro Club to a 2-2 set up. This is as a result of those located on the existing 2-3 in the latter area complaining rightly so about the lack of space. There are a couple of the aircraft with the new seats in and as someone stated the new 'y' seats are of a thinner construction. These actions make many of the rumours more questionable or pertinent depending on your view.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:26.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.