PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   L1011 Aoc (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/189782-l1011-aoc.html)

TAA_L1011 12th Sep 2005 21:26

L1011 Aoc
 
Does anyone know of an airline (defunct or operating) that I can negotiate a temporary deal with to operate an L1011 on flights from JFK to Africa and back?

We are in the process of getting our home AOC location up to Category 1 standards, put this is a long and expensive process.

Can anyone assist.?

Thanks,

Rick

girt big un 12th Sep 2005 21:51

Are you completely mad or have just left junior school?

TAA_L1011 12th Sep 2005 22:00

HUH?
 
What do you mean. Many companies do ACMI as well as strike deals to operate other companies aircraft.

Why is this unusual at all?

Rick

girt big un 12th Sep 2005 22:11

L1011 is very old so why on earth with fuel at its present level would you want to operate a fuel guzzeler. America to Africa needs a African or American airline to provide ACMI and Licence coverage and I cannot imagine anyone being stupid enough to get invoved. But this is aviation and no doubt there is a lid to your saucepan out there somewhere. I wish you well and will buy a seat on your first flight. Just let me know the time and date and I will be there. I will be seventy soon so I do not have a lot of time, hurry up!!

Wizofoz 13th Sep 2005 07:40

Hang on a sec...Wasn't there some other chap starting an airline with L1011s? Neil someone...:sad:

Engineer 13th Sep 2005 09:50

If you are serious may be you should pm this person sure he will point you in the right direction.

You will have to ignore the other posts they appear to lack the ability to enter into sensible conversation :{

TAA_L1011 13th Sep 2005 13:42

I thank you for your intelligent reply.

I have read a VERY long thread here about some folks that may or may not have been setting up an L10-11 based airline in Ireland o someplace.

I assure you we are not a startup. Simply a reactivation of an ACMI based airline.

I know the limitations and issues regarding Tristars and are working on basic solutions for all of them. These aircraft were designed with a 30 year life limit at a normal airline workload. They will last at least a few more years!

Rick

girt big un 13th Sep 2005 20:48

If you want to contract on an ACMI basis you have to have an AOC, if you do not have an you have to be a licenced tour operator. Or you persade some airline to operate using their flight prefix, take all the financial risks and hope it does not go wrong. BWA did this for Warren in Italy and Franco in Luton and where are they now!!!!

Not the route for an arline to make good business me thinks.

trainer too 2 14th Sep 2005 08:45

There are still some Portugeese registered L1011s. Don't know the operator.

broottmeenoo 26th Sep 2005 18:14

It's Luzair, they operate 2 of them (500).

FirstOfficer 26th Sep 2005 18:33

Yes Luzair operates 2 of them, but i believe one of them is parked at AMS awaiting for an engine change.

CS-TMX 30th Sep 2005 23:00

It seems TransAtlantic Airlines is reactivating some ex-Delta L-1011's at Victorville.

One of them is N723DA:
http://www.l1011.homestead.com/Trans...-Airlines.html

Now I ask... If TAA wants to make flights from JFK to West Africa destinations, why choosing L-1011-1??? This aircraft doesn't even have transatlantic range!

Nevertheless it would be nice to see those TriStars flying again.

Best luck for TAA.

Heffer 1st Oct 2005 17:40

So what if the aircraft was built to last 30 years. It may be mechanically "sound" but on the kind of utilisation you're looking at - how expensive?

And when something goes bang and you have to wait weeks for a part to be manufactured by Lockheed, will you continue revenue service with a sub'd aircraft? That will cost a bit! Dont get me wrong, vintage aircraft can be commercial viable but I think this kind of operation will break beyond that point?

I think someone might be mixing business with emotion here.

Manker 1st Oct 2005 18:03

'L1011 is very old so why on earth with fuel at its present level would you want to operate a fuel guzzeler'

I seem to remember that the L-1011 burns 8 Tons/hour. Compared to the 747-200 at 12 tons/hour, that is not bad economy when it can carry 80% of the 747's pax load.


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:37.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.