Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

European Aviation - how do you rate them?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

European Aviation - how do you rate them?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2003, 02:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Midlands Airport (EMA)
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question European Aviation - how do you rate them?

After hearing some of the rumours about European looking at replacing their Boeing 737-200 in the not too far future, I was wondering whether some people could tell me a bit about the airline.

I have met crews from EAAC at EMA when they did flights to/from ALC last summer and most seemed to be young, happy and tired, but:

1. What are the Boeing 737-200s like to work/fly on?
2. How efficient is the fleet of Boeing 737-200s?
3. Does anyone have any comments about how their trips on EAAC shorthaul have been?

I am just very interested in this outfit.

Thanks
bmibaby.com is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2003, 05:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

The 737-200's are not very efficient. The flights from/to MAN are mostly delayed. Most of the 732's that they have are ex Sabena and were built in the mid 1970's. The cabins are worn (my dad flew on them from MAN-CDG) but you would expect that from a aircraft that is going on 30 years old.

BAe 146-100
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2003, 16:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same goes for the 747 - 200's they now look great from the outside(new livery - paint job) - but are an absolute mess on the inside, the cabin on all aircraft are falling apart and are pretty thredbare!
hotdowntheback is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2003, 18:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

The new livery is very nice though, I wish they would put it on the 737-200's .

BAe 146-100
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2003, 03:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hotdowntheback

Maybe you could provide some more information on the interiors of the European B747-200. When did you fly on them to make your assessment? I am interested as I know someone who is going to Florida with them very soon.
Low Cost Eng is online now  
Old 31st Jul 2003, 04:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking European Aviation

Well I think European Aviation are Brilliant! I have worked for them and there is an extremely high standard of customer service on their flights.

The company is on the up and they are a good company to go with. As they merge with Bath Travel the reputation of the company will go up and up.

I say European Aviation should be highly rated.
ann1979 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2003, 00:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ann1979

A very interesting contribution from you as what you have said matches the feedback I have already received about European Aviation. Maybe hotdowntheback has some kind of axe to grind with them but he does little for his own reputation by spreading what is quite clearly false information.
Low Cost Eng is online now  
Old 1st Aug 2003, 01:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EDI, LHR, NQY
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bmibaby.com, I'd be happy to fly with EAL on a charter service (reasonable cabin crew, not bad seat pitch, sensible flight crew) but I was NOT happy when Donnington Hall thought one of the EAL 737s was an adequate substitute for the hailstone-damaged A321 G-MIDJ for two months. If I pay £300 for a domestic return I do not expect a tatty old a/c which still has ashtrays in the seats. Hotdowntheback's assessment of the cabins seemed pretty accurate to me. Fine for charter, though, I'm sure.
ajamieson is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2003, 01:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low Cost Engineer

I have no axe to grind, I simply speak the truth. I flew to Orlando with them last month. The crew and service are similar if not as good as any other charter airline, but the cabin is in poor shape.

There is no need to create a slanging match my comment is that of a valid one.

You will enjoy your flight whatever I'm sure.

hotdowntheback is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2003, 03:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except that with 'any other airline' you will probably get a minimum seat pitch of 28". The European seat pitch on the 747 is 31" - that can make a lot of difference after 9 hours...
Redstripe is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2003, 06:39
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Christ, were the first half dozen threads writtern by 10yr olds, and the original question E A how do you rate them , bmi baby why did you bother to ask such an inane question.
Mouser is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2003, 22:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
As an experienced flyer who has flown both those 747-200's and the 737, I sent in my cv for a cabin crew job.

I didn't hear a thing. Guess they must have all the crew they need for their operaions!!!
crewmeal is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 06:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: boh
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
iv been with eal for two years "feels like 20!" iv got one month to go i cant wait. no more getting fu*ked around not knowing what you are doing from week to week no more late pay no more -30 in russia in the winter "did that one a lot" i feel like my life is about to start and i cant wait rate it 2/10 "god i must be in a good mood"
xr4x4 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 14:09
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere between here and there....
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
xr4x4 if EAAC is that bad, why have you waited for 2 years to escape? Maybe nobody else will employ you with an attitude like that. What do you expect from an ad-hoc airline, surely not a stable roster ? Your life is about to start hey, have you just got one then ?
VIKING9 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 18:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a couple of observations...

The takeover by Bath Travel has still not been completed, although they supply a considerable amount of the work that European do.

The 737-300's have been deferred indefinately

They appear to have a good team, particularly in the cabin, but they suffer from operating old tired equipment.
jmc-man is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 18:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,539
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
JMC Man.

'733's deferred indefinitely' that's a very firm statement to make, not sure you are correct though. I've heard differently
surely not is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 18:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
European Aviation -rate them

Flown on the 747-200 as cattle class four times now , intend to
do it again later in the year to Florida again. As a charter flight the service is excellent , aircraft okay for their age , but the interiors are now looking and feel shabby.

They get you to were you want to go for the price you pay , I've
had no significant delays or problems.

Good luck for the future European ..keep on truckin !!
TRISTARLOVER is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 18:58
  #18 (permalink)  
FOZ
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over the last 4 years, I have flown with EAAC on several occasions - all private charters and have found them to be fine. Yes the preference would be to fly on newer aircraft, but the 200's are OK if not a little noisy. The interiors are always clean, and more importantly the crew have always been polite, friendly and professional.

The role of providing "ad-hoc" charters is a difficult one - you don't always know where your next job will be or when it will come. EAAC carry out some regular charter work, but without the ad-hoc side, there would be many flights that possibly would have been cancelled which EAAC have operated. G-MIDJ and if the choice is 737-200 or no flight, I'd take the 737-200.

I hope that the takeover by Bath Travel will not change EAAC to just another charter airline - its services are needed (even with older a/c).
FOZ is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 19:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I worked at EAL in 2002 and it was the worst experience of my life, I left after 9 disrupted months. They need to be investigated by the CAA, dodgy long hours, no notice of changes to rosters, incompetent crewing, promotions given to "friends" of management, crappy old 25 year old aircraft, falling apart and not repaired inside.
I say AVOID
mrgoodguy is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2004, 22:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,539
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So nothing to do with you then Mr Good guy?
surely not is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.