Scotland are Shortchanged
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scotland are Shortchanged
Hi,
Been discussing this rather emotive issue with a few aviation insiders who agree with the above statement.
Its seems now to be a fact of life that if you want to go anywhere in the world scheduled from Scotland then you must fly down south to either London or Manchester. If you look at the big low cost carriers for a start the only one taking the initiative are Ryanair with there new daily european destinations from Prestwick but Easyjet the only other big low cost carrier with a route from Scotland into Europe has reduced its Amsterdam service to once a day so that there aircraft can be used at one of there many new English bases.
Sure we now have Flyglobespan.com and Air Scotland.com but why did it have to take these airlines starting up??? the market was there already but was completely ignored by Easyjet and Go as it was then, Easyjet can come up with this nonsense all they want that its to expensive from BAA Scotland but heck the 2 aforementioned airlines can do it so why cant they.
And also lets look at Scheduled, shall we take Florida for an example, if l want to go scheduled to Florida then l need to either go to newark, toronto, chicago(note first 3 destinations served by foreign carriers not British), london or manchester to get a connecting flight which is inconvenient, you may say well fly charter..... yes ok but what if l dont want to go charter? what if l dont want to fly to Sanford Airport instead of Orlando International? what if l dont want to pay the ridiculously large supplements per person charged for departures from Scotland.
There are almost 10 flights per week from Scotland to Florida using 767 and A330's, now if each aircraft were to hold 250 pax then thats 2,250 pax per week during the summer surely to god a once a week scheduled summer service from GLA-MCO would work and would give the travelling scots public something we have never had "CHOICE".
My whole rant is that it must be so convenient to live down south and have so much choice and cheaper fares but l feel discriminated against for living in Scotland.
l can't speak for Wales or Northern lreland but l am certain they must have similar problems and l just wonder if any British Airline be it Scheduled or Low-Cost will come in and give the scottish people more of what they want.
Look forward to your replies.
Deeko.
Been discussing this rather emotive issue with a few aviation insiders who agree with the above statement.
Its seems now to be a fact of life that if you want to go anywhere in the world scheduled from Scotland then you must fly down south to either London or Manchester. If you look at the big low cost carriers for a start the only one taking the initiative are Ryanair with there new daily european destinations from Prestwick but Easyjet the only other big low cost carrier with a route from Scotland into Europe has reduced its Amsterdam service to once a day so that there aircraft can be used at one of there many new English bases.
Sure we now have Flyglobespan.com and Air Scotland.com but why did it have to take these airlines starting up??? the market was there already but was completely ignored by Easyjet and Go as it was then, Easyjet can come up with this nonsense all they want that its to expensive from BAA Scotland but heck the 2 aforementioned airlines can do it so why cant they.
And also lets look at Scheduled, shall we take Florida for an example, if l want to go scheduled to Florida then l need to either go to newark, toronto, chicago(note first 3 destinations served by foreign carriers not British), london or manchester to get a connecting flight which is inconvenient, you may say well fly charter..... yes ok but what if l dont want to go charter? what if l dont want to fly to Sanford Airport instead of Orlando International? what if l dont want to pay the ridiculously large supplements per person charged for departures from Scotland.
There are almost 10 flights per week from Scotland to Florida using 767 and A330's, now if each aircraft were to hold 250 pax then thats 2,250 pax per week during the summer surely to god a once a week scheduled summer service from GLA-MCO would work and would give the travelling scots public something we have never had "CHOICE".
My whole rant is that it must be so convenient to live down south and have so much choice and cheaper fares but l feel discriminated against for living in Scotland.
l can't speak for Wales or Northern lreland but l am certain they must have similar problems and l just wonder if any British Airline be it Scheduled or Low-Cost will come in and give the scottish people more of what they want.
Look forward to your replies.
Deeko.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a fellow travelling Scot, I fully sympathise, Deeko! 
All credit to Ryanair at Prestwick for at least keeping alive the idea of direct scheduled European air links from Scotland, even if not everyone loves the airline or their choice of airports. We should also applaud airlines like CSA and Germanwings for recognising the potential from Scotland. Hopefully more airlines will follow suit in the very near future.
It's true that easyJet reduced the GLA-AMS service to once daily, however all credit to KLM for stepping in there and filling the vacuum. However, it is not much of a vote of confidence in Scotland for easyJet to have done this. In doing so, I wonder if they set back the cause of establishing a euro hub in Scotland by quite a few years.
Good luck to flyglobespan and Air Scotland. We know that Air Scotland (after a not-brilliant start) is beginning to talk of further expansion. I think Lanzarotte was mooted? However, what Scotland really needs is a proper scheduled year-round national airline, serving a combination of Mediterranean resorts plus European capitals and business centres, and perhaps ultimately some transatlantic destinations. Flyglobespan are talking about launching Canadian services (which is great news), but again on a summer-only 'charter' basis.
Like you, I much prefer to travel scheduled. I occasionally fly between EDI and PMI, and usually travel bmi through LHR, despite a whole host of direct charter flights I could take, if I were so minded.
As much as I hate to bring the Irish example up, but if Ireland can do it, Scotland (with its larger population) must surely be able to do it? Hopefully BAA Scottish Airports will have a few aces up their sleeve in respect of further developments in the near future.
Callum.
All credit to Ryanair at Prestwick for at least keeping alive the idea of direct scheduled European air links from Scotland, even if not everyone loves the airline or their choice of airports. We should also applaud airlines like CSA and Germanwings for recognising the potential from Scotland. Hopefully more airlines will follow suit in the very near future.
It's true that easyJet reduced the GLA-AMS service to once daily, however all credit to KLM for stepping in there and filling the vacuum. However, it is not much of a vote of confidence in Scotland for easyJet to have done this. In doing so, I wonder if they set back the cause of establishing a euro hub in Scotland by quite a few years.
Good luck to flyglobespan and Air Scotland. We know that Air Scotland (after a not-brilliant start) is beginning to talk of further expansion. I think Lanzarotte was mooted? However, what Scotland really needs is a proper scheduled year-round national airline, serving a combination of Mediterranean resorts plus European capitals and business centres, and perhaps ultimately some transatlantic destinations. Flyglobespan are talking about launching Canadian services (which is great news), but again on a summer-only 'charter' basis.
Like you, I much prefer to travel scheduled. I occasionally fly between EDI and PMI, and usually travel bmi through LHR, despite a whole host of direct charter flights I could take, if I were so minded.
As much as I hate to bring the Irish example up, but if Ireland can do it, Scotland (with its larger population) must surely be able to do it? Hopefully BAA Scottish Airports will have a few aces up their sleeve in respect of further developments in the near future.
Callum.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of EU
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE easyJet
I too would like some direct services to the continent, easyJet has reduced the GLA service to AMS but the EDI service has remained at its twice a day level.
However rather than vent your fury at easyJet perhaps vent it at BAA.
The original plan (I believe) was to put 3 extra aircraft into GLA to expand into Europe. However Newcastle airport offered them a better deal. So easyJet had two options, one which was more profitable than the other.
Which would you choose? Afterall you're a business looking for value and profit and not a charity?
I'm sure once BAA get their charging model correct then services into the EU by many different carriers including easyJet will start too happen.
easyJet has 120 airbus coming and they have to go somewhere.
With regard to Air Scotland, well they're not doing terribly well are they. The service they offered from Aberdeen to the Med attracted how many? About 38 according to the press.
flyglobespan, on the face of it, seem to be doing quite well but I read somewhere that although they had 80% load factors. The actual amount of travellers who booked online as independent travellers was only 20% of overall passenger numbers. The rest were flown on the airline as part of a package holiday through globespan. So it's a scheduled/charter mix. Remember that flyglobespan are only serving places such as Nice once a week. Hardly a true scheduled service of use mainly to the holiday maker and not the business traveller.
So perhaps the scheduled market isn't as strong as you think and it needs incentives to entice companies to provide these routes.
I don't think easyJet has anything to fear from the Scottish public as Kenny MacAskill suggests by not providing those European services. After all the market is very price sensitive and the only way eJ would enter the market is if it could offer low fares and still make a profit.
I'd rather eJ wait for the froth to blow off the top of the market and then secured a good deal off BAA before committing to expansion in Scotland.
However rather than vent your fury at easyJet perhaps vent it at BAA.
The original plan (I believe) was to put 3 extra aircraft into GLA to expand into Europe. However Newcastle airport offered them a better deal. So easyJet had two options, one which was more profitable than the other.
Which would you choose? Afterall you're a business looking for value and profit and not a charity?
I'm sure once BAA get their charging model correct then services into the EU by many different carriers including easyJet will start too happen.
easyJet has 120 airbus coming and they have to go somewhere.
With regard to Air Scotland, well they're not doing terribly well are they. The service they offered from Aberdeen to the Med attracted how many? About 38 according to the press.
flyglobespan, on the face of it, seem to be doing quite well but I read somewhere that although they had 80% load factors. The actual amount of travellers who booked online as independent travellers was only 20% of overall passenger numbers. The rest were flown on the airline as part of a package holiday through globespan. So it's a scheduled/charter mix. Remember that flyglobespan are only serving places such as Nice once a week. Hardly a true scheduled service of use mainly to the holiday maker and not the business traveller.
So perhaps the scheduled market isn't as strong as you think and it needs incentives to entice companies to provide these routes.
I don't think easyJet has anything to fear from the Scottish public as Kenny MacAskill suggests by not providing those European services. After all the market is very price sensitive and the only way eJ would enter the market is if it could offer low fares and still make a profit.
I'd rather eJ wait for the froth to blow off the top of the market and then secured a good deal off BAA before committing to expansion in Scotland.
Last edited by Scottie; 14th Jun 2003 at 18:56.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lightbluetouchpaper,
I am fully aware the differences in population between Scotland and London, but l am not looking for BA, Virgin or Easyjet to have a main base all l am merely asking for is a few new destinations to the continent from Scotland direct, if you were actually to see the amount of passengers who travel from Scotland down south to get a connecting flight to anywhere in the world the statistics l am very sure would surprise you.
Scottie,
I do agree that the BAA have a hand in all of this and am not trying to put all the blame on them, yes Easyjet are a business you are quite right they must go for the best deals but l am hoping with the £60 million invested to attract new routes will soon give us some new routes but we'll see time will tell.
I also hope we can now stop arguing between us which airport is better be it Edinburgh, Glasgow, Preswtick or Aberdeen because in truth we get nothing substantial aircraft wise and route wise so we should back any airline who wants to fly into any Scottish Airport as it can only be good for the people primarily but also for Scottish Aviation.
Regards
Deeko
I am fully aware the differences in population between Scotland and London, but l am not looking for BA, Virgin or Easyjet to have a main base all l am merely asking for is a few new destinations to the continent from Scotland direct, if you were actually to see the amount of passengers who travel from Scotland down south to get a connecting flight to anywhere in the world the statistics l am very sure would surprise you.
Scottie,
I do agree that the BAA have a hand in all of this and am not trying to put all the blame on them, yes Easyjet are a business you are quite right they must go for the best deals but l am hoping with the £60 million invested to attract new routes will soon give us some new routes but we'll see time will tell.
I also hope we can now stop arguing between us which airport is better be it Edinburgh, Glasgow, Preswtick or Aberdeen because in truth we get nothing substantial aircraft wise and route wise so we should back any airline who wants to fly into any Scottish Airport as it can only be good for the people primarily but also for Scottish Aviation.
Regards
Deeko
Deeko01
if you were actually to see the amount of passengers who travel from Scotland down south to get a connecting flight to anywhere in the world the statistics l am very sure would surprise you.
I should like to be surprised. Please post a summary of the statistics you refer to.
YS
if you were actually to see the amount of passengers who travel from Scotland down south to get a connecting flight to anywhere in the world the statistics l am very sure would surprise you.
I should like to be surprised. Please post a summary of the statistics you refer to.
YS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yellow Sun,
I am sorry l should have rephrased that, l myself would like to see the figures of passengers travelling from Scotland to London as given it is if the not the biggest then on of the biggest routes in the world.
Regards
Deeko
p.s. anything better to offer??
I am sorry l should have rephrased that, l myself would like to see the figures of passengers travelling from Scotland to London as given it is if the not the biggest then on of the biggest routes in the world.
Regards
Deeko
p.s. anything better to offer??
Deeko01
I am now totally confused. Do you or do you not have any passenger figures for the relevant existing routes to back up your assertions that there is a viable market for new direct routes from Scotland?
lightbluetouchpaper understands the problem, his figures contain the key. It's population density and size that matters in deciding to allocate resources to the potential market. There are other factors such as socio-economic makeup of the market, but they are not as important as the first two. To put it simply, if the people are there the figures will fit.
YS
l myself would like to see the figures of passengers travelling from Scotland to London as given it is if the not the biggest then on of the biggest routes in the world.
lightbluetouchpaper understands the problem, his figures contain the key. It's population density and size that matters in deciding to allocate resources to the potential market. There are other factors such as socio-economic makeup of the market, but they are not as important as the first two. To put it simply, if the people are there the figures will fit.
YS
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seem to to remember figures quoted a couple of years ago that about 25-30% of pax on EDI/GLA-LHR/LGW/STN routes were tranferring to onward services. As for pax numbers on these services, are they not available on a monthly basis from the CAA website?
YS,
I don't think any of us are demanding services at a level anywhere near that of London hubs - that would of course be silly. However, services in Scotland are pretty poor. As someone said earlier, Ireland has a smaller population than Scotland and a similar (if not larger?) land area, yet it is streets ahead in terms of intenational links.
YS,
I don't think any of us are demanding services at a level anywhere near that of London hubs - that would of course be silly. However, services in Scotland are pretty poor. As someone said earlier, Ireland has a smaller population than Scotland and a similar (if not larger?) land area, yet it is streets ahead in terms of intenational links.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EGPFlyer,
Agreed with that but also when you look at the other foreign airlines who operate into GLA they also offer that facility of connecting through places like Toronto, Newark and Chicago the crux of the matter is we are extremely let down by our own countries airlines and yes thats you British Airways thats you Virgin Airlines and thats you Easyjet.
Regards
Deeko
Agreed with that but also when you look at the other foreign airlines who operate into GLA they also offer that facility of connecting through places like Toronto, Newark and Chicago the crux of the matter is we are extremely let down by our own countries airlines and yes thats you British Airways thats you Virgin Airlines and thats you Easyjet.
Regards
Deeko
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thing l have noticed is the lack of views on this thread and posts, could it be that the people from down south just dont care because they have all the great selection of flights and dont tend to take much interest if any in Scotland ........a wee bit like those airlines you outed!!!! 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Caledonian, I think you are quite right, people down south don't care, and why should they when they have it all on their doorstep. Bet they would soon be yelling though if every time they wanted to get out of Britain they had to first take an internal flight to get there.
While the journey itself is not such an inconvenience it is all the extra time and expense involved that really p***** most people off. It’s not a case of just hopping on a nice connecting flight to get down to London. It usually takes an extra day of travelling often with an overnight stay at an overpriced airport hotel in order to make an early morning flight. If you are lucky enough to be able to take both flights on the same day, it usually involves spending most of the day wandering around airports. The word connecting seems to be used in the loosest sense by the travel companies.
Then we get to the cost of the flight itself. Why should we have to pay extra for our flights? Yes there are great deals out there, but they are usually from Heathrow and Gatwick and you can guarantee paying an extra 100 or so for your connecting flights, even the low cost flights, once tax is added, tend to negate the savings that would have been made.
I don't think anyone here is suggesting that Scotland could support as many flights as London, but then again, London airports would lose a large part of their customer base if the Scots didn't have to fly through there, and we wouldn't want that would we? Maybe that’s why our friends from south of the border are so against the idea... I'm all right Jack, so f*** you?
Services to the continent, and further abroad, from Scotland may well be economically viable, but the Scottish people have got used to the situation and know its futile to complain so it seems that the customer base isn’t there, why be so against the idea until its been tried, though? The flights we do have to holiday destinations (the usual bucket and spade flights) are extremely well subscribed, in fact Iberworld have 2 flights to Tenerife from Edinburgh and Glasgow that depart at the same time to keep up with the demand.
Maybe its time for someone to take a chance, and then we all know the major airlines will come flooding in to try and pick up the routes they dismissed, and to stamp out the little guy before he gets too big for his boots (and before anyone has a go about that, tongue is inserted firmly in cheek as I type!)
While the journey itself is not such an inconvenience it is all the extra time and expense involved that really p***** most people off. It’s not a case of just hopping on a nice connecting flight to get down to London. It usually takes an extra day of travelling often with an overnight stay at an overpriced airport hotel in order to make an early morning flight. If you are lucky enough to be able to take both flights on the same day, it usually involves spending most of the day wandering around airports. The word connecting seems to be used in the loosest sense by the travel companies.
Then we get to the cost of the flight itself. Why should we have to pay extra for our flights? Yes there are great deals out there, but they are usually from Heathrow and Gatwick and you can guarantee paying an extra 100 or so for your connecting flights, even the low cost flights, once tax is added, tend to negate the savings that would have been made.
I don't think anyone here is suggesting that Scotland could support as many flights as London, but then again, London airports would lose a large part of their customer base if the Scots didn't have to fly through there, and we wouldn't want that would we? Maybe that’s why our friends from south of the border are so against the idea... I'm all right Jack, so f*** you?
Services to the continent, and further abroad, from Scotland may well be economically viable, but the Scottish people have got used to the situation and know its futile to complain so it seems that the customer base isn’t there, why be so against the idea until its been tried, though? The flights we do have to holiday destinations (the usual bucket and spade flights) are extremely well subscribed, in fact Iberworld have 2 flights to Tenerife from Edinburgh and Glasgow that depart at the same time to keep up with the demand.
Maybe its time for someone to take a chance, and then we all know the major airlines will come flooding in to try and pick up the routes they dismissed, and to stamp out the little guy before he gets too big for his boots (and before anyone has a go about that, tongue is inserted firmly in cheek as I type!)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Livingston and Edinburgh
Age: 86
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
>>Services to the continent, and further abroad, from Scotland may well be economically viable, but the Scottish people have got used to the situation and know its futile to complain so it seems that the customer base isn’t there, <<
One isn't expecting a population of 5M to take umpteen flights
each year...Scotland is a major tourist and business destination.
Our troubles do not lie with lack of population but are more to do
with lack of enthusiasm from monopoly airport owners BAA.
The stumbling block at present appears to be the provision of
long-haul scheduled and charter routes.
Of course folk will use their local Scottish airport to make connections. One has to brave and make decisions about which
Scottish Airport both visitors and natives prefer.
Our full potential will only be realised when BAA are forced to relinquish exclusive control of Aberdeen, Edinburgh or Glasgow airports.
One isn't expecting a population of 5M to take umpteen flights
each year...Scotland is a major tourist and business destination.
Our troubles do not lie with lack of population but are more to do
with lack of enthusiasm from monopoly airport owners BAA.
The stumbling block at present appears to be the provision of
long-haul scheduled and charter routes.
Of course folk will use their local Scottish airport to make connections. One has to brave and make decisions about which
Scottish Airport both visitors and natives prefer.
Our full potential will only be realised when BAA are forced to relinquish exclusive control of Aberdeen, Edinburgh or Glasgow airports.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the foot of the Lammermuirs
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scotland
Size = 30,414 sq mi
Population = 5m
London
Size = 607 sq mi
Population = 7.5m
Size = 30,414 sq mi
Population = 5m
London
Size = 607 sq mi
Population = 7.5m
Population = 5.4m
If the Ireland can run sustain an airline with the type and multitude of routes that it does, surely Scotland should be able to do the same?
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Livingston and Edinburgh
Age: 86
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
>>If the Ireland can run sustain an airline with the type and multitude of routes that it does, surely Scotland should be able to do the same?<<
Ireland does not have the BAA factor?
Perhaps Scotland's main centre of tourism/commerce/accessibility is being long-haul bypassed.?
We won't know until the glaring 'Black Hole' is filled with the
obvious.
Ireland does not have the BAA factor?
Perhaps Scotland's main centre of tourism/commerce/accessibility is being long-haul bypassed.?
We won't know until the glaring 'Black Hole' is filled with the
obvious.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
gawain,
I take it your talking about some of the stuff mentioned in this article in todays Herald?
Any hints?
I take it your talking about some of the stuff mentioned in this article in todays Herald?
Any hints?