Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Have Bergerac done the right thing?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Have Bergerac done the right thing?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Mar 2003, 12:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Have Bergerac done the right thing?

Reported to be prepared to pay Ryanair c£370k/annum to keep link going.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/2847573.stm

Last edited by newswatcher; 14th Mar 2003 at 14:11.
newswatcher is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2003, 13:57
  #2 (permalink)  
Autorise a L'atterrissage
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It beggars belief that this has happened. I fully apreciate the reason behind the Bergerac chamber of commerce for doing this, but I wonder why Ryanair simply dont charge more for the tickets (the figure you quote divided by the number of annual passengers isn't much) instead of this.
Seems to me that the low cost carriers, if this procedure is allowed to become widespread, will soon be able to hold a (metaphorical) pistol to many towns/cities they visit demanding money with the 'menace' that they will drop the route if the destination doesent 'cough'.
Leclairage is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2003, 14:11
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Leclairage, I think that works out at c£9/head carried during the past year, but not sure when the service actually started.
newswatcher is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2003, 15:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can see why the Chamber of Commerce did it and it wouldn't surprise me if other regions which presently enjoy Buzz/RyanAir service did the same as their economies have become so dependent on the tourism that low cost services bring. The basis of such a subsidy has to be up to each region but I would have thought that the "gun to the head" impression could be mitigated if the subsidy was structured on a sliding scale against traffic/yields on the route - as traffic and revenues grow, the less subsidy would be paid. It's really just a private enterprise version of the US Essential Air Service programme. Also, I suppose if RyanAir said the offered subsidy wasn't enough, the Chamber could approach easyJet or other LCCs and get some sort of an auction going!

Last edited by Torquelink; 14th Mar 2003 at 15:24.
Torquelink is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2003, 16:33
  #5 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe these airports should have an auction...

Brussels is crazy to try and outlaw these agreements, as it negates the competitive potential of them against the larger airports, and thus hands the airport operators a whip-hand. But it should ensure they are done in a way that the small airport has more options and more control.
MarkD is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2003, 16:19
  #6 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: STN and HPN
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
www.ebay.com/pleaseflyhere
Departures Beckham is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.