Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

luton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2002, 20:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up luton

For those of you that have an interest in what is happening at EGGW there is a website at www.lutonmovements.co.uk The website contains information on maintenance visits, schedules, movements, news and photos, also there is a newsgroup at free.uk.airports-luton

Last edited by LTNman; 7th Sep 2002 at 20:58.
LTNman is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2002, 18:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Somewhere between here and there....
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another opportunity for EZY to throw their toys out of their pram. Mind you, BMibaby could do with some new toys.........
VIKING9 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2002, 19:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Luton has failed to attract a single middle/large sized airline to start scheduled services into or out of Luton since 1995 when easyjet and Debonair first came to Luton. Despite problems with slots Air Berlin has just announced 6 new routes to Germany out of Stansted while Luton’s management look on with envy.
LTNman is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2002, 21:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why anyone would want to fly into an airport in the middle of nowere is beyone me! STANSTED
saddles is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 08:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite agree STN is so out of the way...and some of the worse road and rail network in the country. LTN so much better, for onward conections. The only communites STN serves well is East Anglia, Essex and North East London.
Tiger is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 11:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: A Virtual World!
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Berlin

I agree - a great shame that TBI did not manage to attract Air Berlin to Luton, particularly with the slot problems at STN.

However, given that TBI seem to be anxious to attract competitors to EZY to Luton, maybe they never got the chance to make Air Berlin an offer. "Meldrewv" and "Buster the Bear" always seem to be in the know .... and ideas guys??
OLNEY 1 BRAVO is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 14:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, why would anyone want to use the M11 which is next to STN, or the STN Express which runs straight into Liverpool Street in 30 mins. When they could get stuck on the M1 or take the smelly bus to Parkway and then get on the Thameslink for 45 mins to Kings X.

LTN = Armpit
STN = Dogs things!!
bacon torpedo is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 17:36
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just had a quick look at railtrack’s timetable for trains from Stansted to Liverpool Street from 16.00 to 19.00. Just 2 trains an hour with a travelling time ranging from 42 minutes to 1hour 5 minutes.

Luton’s standard daytime service is 8 trains an hour 4 of which get to Kings Cross Thameslink in 35 minutes. Luton has direct access to 30 London stations via the Thameslink network. Also not forgetting Midland Mainlines services to the Midlands and their non stop service to St Pancras in under 25 minutes. Luton must be the best connected airport to the capital.
LTNman is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 19:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ltn and trains

whatever happened to the plan to put a rail line in at ltn like man?
canberra is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2002, 20:50
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airport is at the top of a hill and the railway is at the bottom so a station by the existing terminal is impossible. There was a detailed plan drawn up to site the main terminal by the Parkway Station and have a Gatwick style monorail up to the existing terminal which would become pure airside. In fact the tunnel under taxiway Alpha was built so a monorail could be built on the other side of the concrete pillars. It might still happen if the airport can buy enough land from Vauxhall motors.
LTNman is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2002, 08:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's face it, Luton is a dump of an airport!!!

Do you really think that getting the train from London to Luton Parkway and then having to get off and haul your bags out the station, wait for a bus and then travel through Luton's traffic to the airport, is a better option than a direct fast train to Stansted?

You must really love Luton....or trains!
bacon torpedo is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2002, 17:47
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don’t want to get into a debate about the pros and cons of LTN v STN but while LTN is far from ideal it does have some advantages over Stansted. On my last visit to the Essex airport despite having no luggage it took what seemed like forever getting from the aircraft to the terminal. This was mainly due to having to descend into a cellar and being confronted by what looked like a queue to exit a football ground but was in fact a queue to board a train to get to the main terminal. The claustrophobic atmosphere was not helped by the fact that someone in the crowd had fa*ted.
LTNman is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2002, 17:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got to agree with Bacon Torpedo about the bag carrying, to bus etc. I didn't have to do it in heavy rain, but can imagine it. And getting from the tube to King's Cross Thameslink as a tourist was cumbersome - funny that they don't promote the train travel from Blackfriars which was less labour-intensive and didn't involve leaving the tube station to get to the train station.

STN is a comfortable, well-laid-out airport; now if they could just pick it up and put it down in a place that mattered!
That aside, I find it so strange that with the proliferation of cheap flights out of STN to so many LoCo destinations that no trans-Atlantic flights are going in there to take advantage of that market. Royal Airlines [defunct] used to do it in the old days from Canada, but the LoCo market wasn't big yet. CO went there from EWR, but why would a full-service promote connections to LoCos?
thefareguru is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2002, 18:37
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hmmm
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll chuck my 'two pennies' worth in...

Hapag Express at STN...

Follow the logic... (although I know that the Hapag Express Aircraft arent they're own)...

Hapag are part of TUI, which own Britannia.
Britannia is based at LTN.
Britannia Engineering is based at LTN.
Britannia Engineering are contracted to service Hapag's 737's.
Hapag are paying (Germania?) to operate the Aircraft.

Logic say's... Lets use STN, not have any engineering cover (that could have been suppiled by one of our own in-house companies!) therefore keeping Aircraft servicable if the go tech in London, and at the same time re-charging Germania some of the money for Engineering support that they are paying towards the Aircraft!!!

It's the same old story - BAA's pockets are a lot deeper than LLA's!
rentaghost is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2002, 08:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Luton
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trains

At least the trains at Luton Parkway run thru the night rather than stopping at about 2400 and leaving hundred's of passengers to be ripped off by the local licensed taxi bandits or to be stuffed into buses (As an article in the Times recently stated).

The response of the BAA (who have enticed all these LCC's with their extended operating hours to STN)when questioned about the rail access and the shut-down at night? Not us mate try Stansted Express!
Ops Bangle is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2002, 10:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: S Rhodesia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BAA do have deep pockets. LHR and LGW can subsidise STN and undercut LTN. However, the official BAA line is they don't do discounts (yeah - even LGW do discounts!)

A lo-cost mate of mine says his company were effectively offerred a £1/pax deal by BAA at STN. I find that hard to believe but it could be the reason all the new guys are beating a path to STN.

Some of these new German carriers are going to compete head to head with the established boys and girls. I do like a good dogfight. For you Luton ze voar is over. Zehr gut meine herren und damen.... ach..nein, nein - Achtung das ist eine Orange Spitfeur. Blut und Eisen!

Tally-ho - orange leader.
TS Hauler is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.