Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Flybe-V1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2021, 12:27
  #781 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: .
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We will certainly need to see more business acumen at running regional airlines than they demonstrated whilst running the airline for the final 13 months or so of its previous existence. Fundamentally, people are just speculating as to where the money is to be made which will make the company so valuable at a stock market floatation. No one else seems to make any real money flying regionally in the UK. I remember a quote from Saad Hamad saying following the last floatation in 2010 they didn't make another profit again until 2016!
cavokblues is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 13:14
  #782 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dorset
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's good to see some things don't change including Jamie's optimism as the chief cheerleader (and pot stirrer) for Flybe's reincarnation on here!

Unless there is a very radical change in the market between now and that time then the prospect of Flybe being floated is fanciful. From those fairly close to this, a trade sale in a very short space of time (less than two years) sounds to be the agenda. That requires a fleet ramp-up to be able to fly slots and therefore hold them in the absence of a continued Covid-19 slot usage waiver. That isn't my assumption by the way - that's the considered view of some involved in this project since Flybe failed.

Am also hearing rumours that a Manchester base / operation is off the cards as the airport won't play ball?
Albert Hall is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 13:30
  #783 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Flybe v1 had an awful history for those who bought shares on almost any date after the flotation in 2010. Declining share price, bailouts, desperate sale for peanuts, and eventual bankruptcy

There would need to be a very compelling story as to why anyone (retail or institution) would want to buy shares in a new IPO. A flotation after less than 2 years doesn't seem long enough to show good prospects, especially when aviation has such a poor history for investors. All seems a bit snake oil to me
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 17:36
  #784 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Nantgarw
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Website

Flybe.com has just been updated. Very interesting is the part of the privacy policy that says "Some of the flights and services that we offer are provided by third parties". Code-sharing agreements already on the table?

Albert Hall

May I ask where you have heard this? As per ACL's allocation report, Flybe do hold MAN slots.
southamptonavgeek is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 17:54
  #785 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many more parts to an operation than just holding slots. Many airlines are assigned slots and never use them. Norwegian had slots at LHR last year or the year before but never used them and gave them back.

I’d imagine the privacy policy with most eventualities in mind so it doesn’t need to be adjusted every time.
BA318 is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 20:04
  #786 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,586
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Have you heard yet? We are a major brand within the UK and, following a short break, we’re returning to the mainstream
Presumably this return to the mainstream doesn't stretch to paying outstanding debts?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 20:20
  #787 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,088
Received 293 Likes on 164 Posts
There are no o/s debts! This is a new business, wake up and join the real world of business / capitalism.

It's not right, but how the world works.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 20:37
  #788 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,586
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Well aware of that - I was referring to the cheeky and their 'short break'.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2021, 21:20
  #789 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It certainly doesn’t extend to the shortfalls in the BRAL pension suffered by many despite Cyrus taking their payouts from the Flybe administrators as secured creditors. It may be legal but it certainly is not moral.
Saabdriver1 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 00:03
  #790 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Albert Hall


I’ll cheerlead anything that gets the former Flybe crews back in the air. Roll on next year.
Jamie2009 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 00:12
  #791 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,574
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATNotts

Same branding. Same aircraft. Same routes. Same staff. Same callsign! In their own words, "following a short break, returning".
But yeah, not liable for any of the mess they left as that was er.....flybe.
Jamie2009 Did you work for these guys before? Surely you're also out of pocket?
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 07:16
  #792 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,088
Received 293 Likes on 164 Posts
It's abhorrent, but why should the new Flybe be lambasted for simply employing the legal framework as countless others across all business sectors have done and continue to.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 07:22
  #793 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,586
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Why should they be given an easy ride when they've left plenty of people out of pocket and are now pretending nothing happened?
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 07:25
  #794 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: .
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carrying the brand over but probably done enough legally to prevent any TUPE claims from re-hired staff.
cavokblues is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 08:36
  #795 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,088
Received 293 Likes on 164 Posts
However, and I appreciate this is a weak defence, they are potentially providing employment in a sector particularly hard hit over the last 18 months.
ATNotts is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 09:19
  #796 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 63
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopefully the majority of the roles will be in Birmingham too ;-)
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 09:23
  #797 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don’t think you can even say that with any certainty. If - as one poster frequently suggests - Flybe is going back to its old routes to try to position itself on them, the airlines now flying those routes won’t stand idly by. A short war will ensue, lots of money will be lost and then jobs will be lost at the end of it on one side or the other. Any employment increase will be transient.
Saabdriver1 is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 14:33
  #798 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 276
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Yep, exactly this.
Jamie, you need to take your head out of the clouds and realise exactly what your cheerleading here. If this outfit gets off the ground and does what it says it’s going to do, then there will be considerable impact on the other UK Regional carriers who are desperately trying to eek out a living in the UK market.

What’s your role/ relationship with the new Flybe can I ask?
Atlantic Explorer is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 15:30
  #799 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 530
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those carriers which have stepped in on UK business trunk routes at once daily frequency or less will need to make a choice. Twice daily morning and evening Mon - Fri (allowing for a full business day) is an opportunity for FlyBe 2.0 if the new incumbent(s) don't close that door. Fares are not the only consideration.
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2021, 16:34
  #800 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dorset
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that applies to only a small number of markets - some of the Belfast flying with BA/EI, MAN-SOU with Eastern, MAN-EXT with Blue Islands and that's really about it. There is a much-changed market for domestic travel patterns and I do have to wonder whether these guys know just how much the landscape has changed during the time they've been out of it.
Albert Hall is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.