Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Gatwick-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Mar 2018, 19:48
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Surrey
Age: 36
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
North terminal check in info
Attached Images
strawberry Ribena is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2018, 19:53
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Surrey
Age: 36
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry if that’s not clear- but that’s pretty new!

Air China
Ethiopian
Qatar all in the north.


I was under the impression that Qatar would use south too, but they’re far too busy. North (level 2) is a ghost town after 2pm!

Last edited by strawberry Ribena; 26th Mar 2018 at 22:21.
strawberry Ribena is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2018, 00:28
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are most certainly a load of spare check in desks. Indeed, Westjet’s is empty for the rest of the day once their flight(s) depart.
Air China moved their new LGW flight to LHR a few years back, are they really going 3 x daily to London?
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2018, 04:55
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: horley
Age: 50
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the air china slots were for a service to CTU.
bunatern is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2018, 12:22
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA are suspending there flight to OAK from 22OCT18.

BA’s flights to LAS resumed for S18. Will continue to operate 3 x weekly through W18
BAladdy is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2018, 22:37
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With that announcement regarding the suspension of OAK from October 2018 I presume there is some some spare long haul capacity available, I wonder if BA are to announce a new destination to replace Oakland or increase frequencies on other routes ex LGW.
canberra97 is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2018, 23:22
  #247 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BAladdy
BA are suspending there flight to OAK from 22OCT18.

BA’s flights to LAS resumed for S18. Will continue to operate 3 x weekly through W18
1-0 Norwegian for that route! Of course there is still gonna be a struggle for them elsewhere but I guess it shows BA can't squeeze them out of the market *that* easily, as long as they stay afloat.
adfly is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 04:14
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by canberra97
With that announcement regarding the suspension of OAK from October 2018 I presume there is some some spare long haul capacity available, I wonder if BA are to announce a new destination to replace Oakland or increase frequencies on other routes ex LGW.
BA plan to operate LGW-LAS year round. The flight will operate 3 x weekly for W18.

This is the same frequency that BA planned to op the OAK for W18.
BAladdy is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 14:35
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any indications as to how FLL is performing for BA?

Arguably, it’s better suited to a 787 at LHR.
nguba is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 15:22
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nguba. Why?
vectisman is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 15:23
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like OAK, FLL was launched to match Norwegian and I’ve seen anecdotal claims of low loads.
nguba is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 18:54
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive heard really poor loads on FLL... even as low as 30 pax regularly. Wouldn’t be surprised to see some changes.
toledoashley is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 19:04
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If BA were to launch LGW-SFO instead, do you think this could perform better than OAK has or not?
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 19:54
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA only launched LGW to Oakland to compete directly with Norwegian and there's absolutely no need for them to start a route to San Francisco as the destination is well covered by the airline from LHR.

With regards to FLL, personally when ever I have been in Miami I've always thought I wish that I was in Ft Lauderdale, also the opposite when I'm in Ft Lauderdale I wish I was in Miami even though they are only 30 miles apart I never actually visited both together but since BA started FLL I can fly to one and out the other as both Ft Lauderdal and Miami are great destinations to visit and having flights from both airports makes it a lot easier to visit both, plus the fact that the company that I work for has business links with the two of them!
canberra97 is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2018, 20:26
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brighton
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA have a poor product. The aircraft interiors are old, so is the technology. Even first is not worth the money. If there is a better choice then why go BA.
stephenjclark50 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2018, 07:38
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stephenjclark50. Yet 40 million plus passengers with BA a year plus profits of hundreds of millions of pounds. I think you make a generalisation sir!
vectisman is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2018, 07:50
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by vectisman
Yet 40 million plus passengers with BA a year plus profits of hundreds of millions of pounds. I think you make a generalisation sir!
As the previous poster alluded to, BA's philosophy is an adaptation of the old BCal slogan: "We never forget you [often don't] have a choice".
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2018, 08:54
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dave Reid
On most routes from Heathrow and Gatwick there is plenty of choice. Norwegian may have newer planes but is prone to delays and cancellations as well as losing money all over the place.
BA is making money at Gatwick up against Norwegian and EasyJet. Extra 150 flights a week from Gatwick this summer. They must be doing something that most people want. Most people want good value fares, the right destination and frequency. Both BA and EasyJet offer that.
vectisman is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2018, 20:21
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brighton
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vectisman: I agree with you in terms of pax and profit. I travel BA regularly and it's a regular occurrence to run out of food and drink. I don't eat or drink excessively, but finding there is not enough cheese or champagne on board and I've only had one glass and this is in first. This equates to poor.
stephenjclark50 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2018, 11:24
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be fair Stephenjclark50 your examples apply to a very small minority of passengers.
vectisman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.