Manchester-2
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Manchester Statistics - August 2019
Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown.
No new routes
Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures)
Amsterdam - 1,055,088 passengers
The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for August.
Belfast City & London City have not reported for this month
In August 2018 these accounted for 27,904 passengers.
Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics
Monthly passengers - 3,336,826 + 5.79%
Annual Total – 14,523,228 + 5.41%
Moving Annual Total - 29,402,454 + 4.99%
Monthly Movements - 20,791 + 3.07%
Annual Movements – 95,690 +2.19%
Moving Annual Movements - 203,729 + 1.44%
Manchester Airport's August statistics
Top destinations with highest percentage increase.
Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers
Figures for the European and long-haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic.
Istanbul figures are affected by the start of the Pegasus service to Sabiha Gokcen airport which I now show separately.
Comparison of top 25 destinations - August 2009 versus August 2019
Major changes to Domestic traffic
CAA statistics for August are provisional.
Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown.
No new routes
Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures)
Amsterdam - 1,055,088 passengers
The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for August.
Belfast City & London City have not reported for this month
In August 2018 these accounted for 27,904 passengers.
Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics
Monthly passengers - 3,336,826 + 5.79%
Annual Total – 14,523,228 + 5.41%
Moving Annual Total - 29,402,454 + 4.99%
Monthly Movements - 20,791 + 3.07%
Annual Movements – 95,690 +2.19%
Moving Annual Movements - 203,729 + 1.44%
Manchester Airport's August statistics
Top destinations with highest percentage increase.
Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers
Figures for the European and long-haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic.
Istanbul figures are affected by the start of the Pegasus service to Sabiha Gokcen airport which I now show separately.
Comparison of top 25 destinations - August 2009 versus August 2019
Major changes to Domestic traffic
CAA statistics for August are provisional.
Last edited by Scottie Dog; 5th Oct 2019 at 10:22.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Ireland
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Manchester Statistics - August 2019
Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown.
No new routes
Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures)
Amsterdam - 1,055,088 passengers
The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for August.
Belfast City & London City have not reported for this month
In August 2018 these accounted for 27,904 passengers.
Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics
Monthly passengers - 3,336,826 + 5.79%
Annual Total – 14,523,228 + 5.41%
Moving Annual Total - 29,402,454 + 4.99%
Monthly Movements - 20,791 + 3.07%
Annual Movements – 95,690 +2.19%
Moving Annual Movements - 203,729 + 1.44%
Manchester Airport's August statistics
Top destinations with highest percentage increase.
Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers
Figures for the European and long-haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic.
Istanbul figures are affected by the start of the Pegasus service to Sabiha Gokcen airport which I now show separately.
Comparison of top 25 destinations - August 2009 versus August 2019
Major changes to Domestic traffic
CAA statistics for August are provisional.
Load factors analysis on certain routes
Calculations are based of FlightRadar24 for days of flight operation, Planespotter.net for Seat Plans and CAA data for monthly figures.
Destinations that are either new (no passengers since my records started in January 2005), or have not been served for a number of years - if the latter then the month and year of the last service is shown.
No new routes
Million passenger routes (Rolling annual figures)
Amsterdam - 1,055,088 passengers
The following domestic statistics are missing from the CAA report for August.
Belfast City & London City have not reported for this month
In August 2018 these accounted for 27,904 passengers.
Moving monthly and annual figures - based on CAA statistics/MAG statistics
Monthly passengers - 3,336,826 + 5.79%
Annual Total – 14,523,228 + 5.41%
Moving Annual Total - 29,402,454 + 4.99%
Monthly Movements - 20,791 + 3.07%
Annual Movements – 95,690 +2.19%
Moving Annual Movements - 203,729 + 1.44%
Manchester Airport's August statistics
Top destinations with highest percentage increase.
Top 25 destinations - by passenger numbers
Figures for the European and long-haul destinations that I consider to be the main points for our connecting traffic.
Istanbul figures are affected by the start of the Pegasus service to Sabiha Gokcen airport which I now show separately.
Comparison of top 25 destinations - August 2009 versus August 2019
Major changes to Domestic traffic
CAA statistics for August are provisional.
Load factors analysis on certain routes
Calculations are based of FlightRadar24 for days of flight operation, Planespotter.net for Seat Plans and CAA data for monthly figures.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MAN doesnt get 100% of the a/c to IAH, SIN or ADD, all are shared with SIN, IAH or BRU. Fares to Iraq are sky high and SV will be probably mostly be used by business, so I'd suggest yeilds aint that bad.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With regards to BGW & JED yes, i would agree but I understand that IA are able to charge high fares which should, if true, give a reasonable yield on a lowish load. What freight does SV carry - a good cargo figure could offset a lower passenger number.
These are only my thoughts as a non-airport person.
I was told that ETH only allocated 30% of seats to Manchester but has a good uplift of cargo, there are due to be quite a few B772 this winter so guess all OK ( ps someone I know said loads out of Brussels are very high)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quick question:
The terminal extension was planned to be open by summer next year but now hearing from MAN-based colleagues that it has been delayed until autumn as it’s six months behind schedule.
Is this official? Not seen anything in the aviation press but maybe it’s appeared in the local papers?
The terminal extension was planned to be open by summer next year but now hearing from MAN-based colleagues that it has been delayed until autumn as it’s six months behind schedule.
Is this official? Not seen anything in the aviation press but maybe it’s appeared in the local papers?
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have to remember that both IAH & ADD are split loads. What I don't know is what the split is for Manchester? Does MAN have 50pc, 30pc of the seats allocated to them - I don't know. Remember the flown seats are presumably the uplift at MAN and therefore the load-factor might need adjusting accordingly.
With regards to BGW & JED yes, i would agree but I understand that IA are able to charge high fares which should, if true, give a reasonable yield on a lowish load. What freight does SV carry - a good cargo figure could offset a lower passenger number.
These are only my thoughts as a non-airport person.
With regards to BGW & JED yes, i would agree but I understand that IA are able to charge high fares which should, if true, give a reasonable yield on a lowish load. What freight does SV carry - a good cargo figure could offset a lower passenger number.
These are only my thoughts as a non-airport person.
Singapore ship a magnitude of boxes both west and east ! and the available seats available for Manchester varies. Revenue targets and yield more than adequate one would have thought
Ethiopian only one of any concern , however again loads of boxes going in the belly and some home office support in bolstering the cabin from time to time , along with NGOs . They need to address the backfill through with those paying customers with their African connection advantages .
If they cant do that it tells us all how weak sub Saharan traffic demand from the North of England is in reality.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quick question:
The terminal extension was planned to be open by summer next year but now hearing from MAN-based colleagues that it has been delayed until autumn as it’s six months behind schedule.
Is this official? Not seen anything in the aviation press but maybe it’s appeared in the local papers?
The terminal extension was planned to be open by summer next year but now hearing from MAN-based colleagues that it has been delayed until autumn as it’s six months behind schedule.
Is this official? Not seen anything in the aviation press but maybe it’s appeared in the local papers?
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 45
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SQ an ET are distorted as we've already established.
SV is a strange route as it's sort of seasonable with the Hadj.
Sep/Oct figures will just look very weird with TCX etc.
SV is a strange route as it's sort of seasonable with the Hadj.
Sep/Oct figures will just look very weird with TCX etc.
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Northwich
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the next couple of years as Saudi Arabia relaxes its visa regulations and opens up to mass tourism, the Saudi route may well see an increase in loads.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Northwich
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why again it’s massively subsided by BAE Systems both mid cabin and in the belly .Yield is adequate.
Tickets at the back are cream but ain’t cheap most of the time
Please stop applying pure capitalist profit loss and bums on seats methods- they are irrelevant here and In the case of the weekly Iraqi service
Tickets at the back are cream but ain’t cheap most of the time
Please stop applying pure capitalist profit loss and bums on seats methods- they are irrelevant here and In the case of the weekly Iraqi service
Last edited by Rutan16; 5th Oct 2019 at 09:26.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why again it’s massively subsided by BAE Systems both mid cabin and in the belly .Yield is adequate.
Tickets at the back are cream but ain’t cheap most of the time
Please stop applying pure capitalist profit loss and bums on seats methods- they are irrelevant here and In the case of the weekly Iraqi service
Tickets at the back are cream but ain’t cheap most of the time
Please stop applying pure capitalist profit loss and bums on seats methods- they are irrelevant here and In the case of the weekly Iraqi service
Meanwhile, BE MAN-GLA gone.
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don’t know what that sweet spot is or indeed the depth of the BAE Systems contract I have an idea on the boxes alone !
There Heathrow flights rarerly touch much over 60% cabin loads either.
Saudia go where the family and BIG business want them to and let me the you BAE Systems are HUGELY important to the Saudi’s . That freight is their very life line I can tell you. Oh and yes they’re projecting the Saudi Whiabi ”message” at the same time
These flights are part of the reason you no longer see to many 4 and 12th squadron Hercs these days!
There Heathrow flights rarerly touch much over 60% cabin loads either.
Saudia go where the family and BIG business want them to and let me the you BAE Systems are HUGELY important to the Saudi’s . That freight is their very life line I can tell you. Oh and yes they’re projecting the Saudi Whiabi ”message” at the same time
These flights are part of the reason you no longer see to many 4 and 12th squadron Hercs these days!