Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Manchester-2

Old 25th Jun 2020, 20:32
  #4261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More often than not dedicated freight flights are more hassle than they're worth to handling agents and other third parties, it's not uncommon for a handling request to be bounced back from various agents before finally finding one willing to handle it.

Most handling agents (at MAN, at least) are stretched to the limit on a good day just with their scheduled passenger flights - throw an often delayed or sporadically timetabled freight into the mix and you've got a lot of issues for your regular airline customers.

Not all that long ago people were waiting 3+ hours for baggage: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ester-45308369

Of course, the answer is for companies to employ more staff.... But with margins being cut so fine, I can't see it happening anytime soon.
750XL is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2020, 21:12
  #4262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 466
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some may appreciate the work post COVID-19. Sadly, "we don't want to know" has become an all too common attitude at MAN. I wouldn't anticipate boom conditions amongst passenger-orientated carriers for quite some time.

Also, not all freighters are ad-hoc. Most are known quantities which can be planned for well in advance.

A bit of "CAN DO" thinking would go a long way.
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2020, 20:16
  #4263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Usually in a bar!
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OOB

You rant about stuff that quite frankly not many people give a toss about.
Of course freight is down at EGCC because the vast majority is carried on pax flights.
You live in Australia (supposedly) but are so angry that Manchester Airport is not pushing much more freight. Why?
Homo Simpson is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2020, 16:55
  #4264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Eas Anglia
Age: 64
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect many of the employees on the cusp of possibly being made unemployed at Swissport, Manchester would definitely "give a toss".

"Jog on down to EMA people, chop chop".

A study of MAG accounts 2019 makes barely any reference to EMA, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that MAG may be coerced into strengthing the balance sheet by its shareholders, many of whom are in The N West, might that be a sale of EMA ?

If it does the MAG board will look pretty stupid having just switch sold traffic to another airport which originally wished to use Manchester.







Last edited by Navpi; 27th Jun 2020 at 21:33.
Navpi is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2020, 21:54
  #4265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.K.
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jeez, are we still on about freight? Give it a rest. Just agree to disagree.

I think the reasons why MAN doesnít see much pure freight traffic has been well covered.

easyflyer83 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2020, 22:51
  #4266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Manchester
Age: 44
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally did loadsheets for Dragonair, Great Wall, Air China, China Airlines, Jett8 back in 2003-2007 during MANs Freighter hay day - which was a glorious period for tonnage.
There was only ever stand 68 ( for side door) and stand 82 ( for nose door) that the airport would give so hardly ever a 'freighter' base.
My current employer insists MAN as an ALTN on the flight plan but would still rather go to EMA/STN/LUX if they can't get in at PIK.
matjr79 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2020, 11:34
  #4267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Usually in a bar!
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point is that the employees looking at redundancy don't care why Manchester isn't a big cargo hub. Bread and butter flights are what matters and that is what they want back not some rant about cargo.
Homo Simpson is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2020, 14:07
  #4268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SYD
Posts: 466
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is bewildering that some on here appear to believe that cargo jobs are without merit. Many cargo services follow a frequent and predictable schedule which implies steady employment for those on the ground. I presume that those moaning aren't about to face their handling agency bosses handing them their P45's?
OzzyOzBorn is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2020, 14:11
  #4269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: london
Age: 56
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prior to Covid19 general cargo didnít cover the cost of the fuel. General cargo was being shipped at $1.00-$1.50 per kilo. At the beginning of the crisis cargo spiked at $8.00-$9.00 a kilo. Now the rush is over it has dropped down to between $2.50-$3.00 a kilo. As more and more passenger wide bodies return to service expect the cargo price to reduce further. The majority of air freight in todayís world is shipped in the belly of passenger aircraft. The B777/787 and the A350 have vast cargo holds and are capable of carrying a full load of passengers plus a very healthy uplift of cargo. The number of dedicated freighter aircraft is diminishing not growing.
Ringway airport handles a fair amount of freight arriving and departing on passenger aircraft.
spacedog is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2020, 19:35
  #4270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OzzyOzBorn
Some may appreciate the work post COVID-19. Sadly, "we don't want to know" has become an all too common attitude at MAN. I wouldn't anticipate boom conditions amongst passenger-orientated carriers for quite some time.

Also, not all freighters are ad-hoc. Most are known quantities which can be planned for well in advance.

A bit of "CAN DO" thinking would go a long way.
Leading SE Asian cargo carrier was reported in another leading industry site - Cathay Pacific (CX, Hong Kong Int'l) is planning to end "many" of its cargo-only flights operated with passenger aircraft as the surge in demand and yields on the cargo market, driven by the demand for personal protective equipment and the drop in capacity, is coming to an end, the South China Morning Post has reported.

"Cargo has been tapering off, and as a result, there will be many cancellations of cargo-only passenger aircraft flights, as the commercial decisions are made closer to the time of the flight," the carrier said in an internal memo.

In a follow-up statement, the airline clarified that it planned to continue operating its fleet of dedicated freighters at high utilisation rates mainly to the USA Frankfurt and Amsterdam. But, it would gradually wean off using passenger aircraft for cargo-only services.

Cathay Pacific is also re-evaluating its earlier plan to convert four passenger B777 aircraft into makeshift freighters. Under the current circumstances, the airline is likely to only convert two jets. Such a conversion is a more permanent step than the straightforward deployment of passenger aircraft on cargo-only flights but with their cabins intact.

The fall in demand for air cargo, caused by the gradual resumption of passenger flights with the associated bellyhold capacity, development of alternative means of transportation, and lower demand for medical supplies, has caused average air freight rates to halve during the last month.

Pertinent points highlighted by me and i am sure Spans would agree with much of the above

And this is also the case down at Slough, Windsor , Hounslow and Spelthorne cargo flights are declining as more passenger flights come back on line cepting USA/Canada where brutal organic blob travel restrictions remain.
Caveat unless your name rhymes Rigel Mariage !

Rutan16 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2020, 20:52
  #4271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rutan16
Leading SE Asian cargo carrier was reported in another leading industry site - Cathay Pacific (CX, Hong Kong Int'l) is planning to end "many" of its cargo-only flights operated with passenger aircraft as the surge in demand and yields on the cargo market, driven by the demand for personal protective equipment and the drop in capacity, is coming to an end, the South China Morning Post has reported.

"Cargo has been tapering off, and as a result, there will be many cancellations of cargo-only passenger aircraft flights, as the commercial decisions are made closer to the time of the flight," the carrier said in an internal memo.

In a follow-up statement, the airline clarified that it planned to continue operating its fleet of dedicated freighters at high utilisation rates mainly to the USA Frankfurt and Amsterdam. But, it would gradually wean off using passenger aircraft for cargo-only services.

Cathay Pacific is also re-evaluating its earlier plan to convert four passenger B777 aircraft into makeshift freighters. Under the current circumstances, the airline is likely to only convert two jets. Such a conversion is a more permanent step than the straightforward deployment of passenger aircraft on cargo-only flights but with their cabins intact.

The fall in demand for air cargo, caused by the gradual resumption of passenger flights with the associated bellyhold capacity, development of alternative means of transportation, and lower demand for medical supplies, has caused average air freight rates to halve during the last month.

Pertinent points highlighted by me and i am sure Spans would agree with much of the above

And this is also the case down at Slough, Windsor , Hounslow and Spelthorne cargo flights are declining as more passenger flights come back on line cepting USA/Canada where brutal organic blob travel restrictions remain.
Caveat unless your name rhymes Rigel Mariage !
Yes 2 of the 777 'refits' have been cancelled, yields on cargo only pax aircraft no longer make it a viable to operate.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 09:49
  #4272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T2X to open in early 2021...not a great surprise really. 3 months of rigorous testing to be performed.
I just hope the current T2 re-opens until then...
MANFAN is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 10:03
  #4273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Would it be a daft question to ask / suggest : Isn't now the perfect time to crack on with the refurb of the old T2 whilst the terminal is not needed, causing the least long term disruption.?
Mr A Tis is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 10:14
  #4274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 73
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that there may be a financial reason - like very little income for over 6 months?
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 17:03
  #4275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 62
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T2

Originally Posted by Scottie Dog
I suspect that there may be a financial reason - like very little income for over 6 months?
I guess like BHX there is a suspension of certain capital project due COVID ?
The terminal expansion at BHX stopped in March !
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 19:19
  #4276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: manchester
Age: 63
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe T2 will open around the 15 July.
techair is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 19:50
  #4277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BHX5DME
I guess like BHX there is a suspension of certain capital project due COVID ?
The terminal expansion at BHX stopped in March !
Regarding the overall MAN TP, itís not clear at the moment which projects are on hold and which are continuing.
The dual taxiway work next to the hangers was still on-going during April & May. This is a project which ops will significantly benefit from in the future, maybe as early as next summer, so surly this for example, is the type of work that has a good justification to continue, after all the funds were already allocated for this type of work...
MANFAN is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 20:28
  #4278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I suspect that there may be a financial reason - like very little income for over 6 months?
I would have thought projects such as the TP for T2 are not financed from day to day income but from Capital financing, loans & investments most of which were surely already in place.
Keeping T2 closed whilst being refurbed might even save money in the long run?
Mr A Tis is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 20:32
  #4279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 73
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by techair
Believe T2 will open around the 15 July.
According to an interview with Brad Miller, Chief Operating Officer, that was released today in Travelweekly's website Terminal 2X will not open until early 2021.

https://travelweekly.co.uk/articles/...pen-early-2021
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2020, 20:53
  #4280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: 2DME
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr A Tis
I would have thought projects such as the TP for T2 are not financed from day to day income but from Capital financing, loans & investments most of which were surely already in place.
Keeping T2 closed whilst being refurbed might even save money in the long run?
But capital finance needs revenue in order to repay it. I suspect that only currently contracted projects that would be too costly to stop in terms of penalty payments to the contractor would be continued. The funding will be in place but until the decision is taken to draw it down presumably it will just sit in the financier's bank.
AndrewH52 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.